Financhill
Buy
55

LIF.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$30.87
Seasonality move :
-2.79%
Day range:
$30.44 - $31.00
52-week range:
$25.85 - $31.16
Dividend yield:
5.05%
P/E ratio:
17.80x
P/S ratio:
10.73x
P/B ratio:
3.05x
Volume:
105.2K
Avg. volume:
179K
1-year change:
4%
Market cap:
$2B
Revenue:
$207.5M
EPS (TTM):
$1.72

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
LIF.TO
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
$39.6M $1.24 -5.44% 148.55% $30.30
ARS.CX
Ares Strategic Mining, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
BKI.TO
Black Iron, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
FEO.V
Oceanic Iron Ore Corp.
-- -- -- -- --
MT.V
M3 Metals Corp.
-- -- -- -- --
RXM.CX
Rockex Mining Corp.
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
LIF.TO
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
$30.68 $30.30 $2B 17.80x $0.35 5.05% 10.73x
ARS.CX
Ares Strategic Mining, Inc.
$0.47 -- $94.3M -- $0.00 0% --
BKI.TO
Black Iron, Inc.
$0.13 -- $39.8M -- $0.00 0% --
FEO.V
Oceanic Iron Ore Corp.
$0.75 -- $114.7M 5.06x $0.00 0% --
MT.V
M3 Metals Corp.
$0.30 -- $3.1M 8.75x $0.00 0% --
RXM.CX
Rockex Mining Corp.
$0.0350 -- $4.7M 2.75x $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
LIF.TO
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
-- 0.403 1.42% 1.76x
ARS.CX
Ares Strategic Mining, Inc.
67.66% -0.567 57.31% 0.94x
BKI.TO
Black Iron, Inc.
-19.89% 7.385 1.9% 0.23x
FEO.V
Oceanic Iron Ore Corp.
127.79% 15.699 42.36% 0.02x
MT.V
M3 Metals Corp.
-- 1.994 -- 10.21x
RXM.CX
Rockex Mining Corp.
-- 8.962 -- 0.05x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
LIF.TO
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
$42.3M $32.9M 17.13% 17.13% 75.13% $32.7M
ARS.CX
Ares Strategic Mining, Inc.
-$3.9K -$1.2M -9.18% -26.28% -- -$4.1M
BKI.TO
Black Iron, Inc.
-$39.3K -$535.8K -- -- -- -$531.6K
FEO.V
Oceanic Iron Ore Corp.
-- -$550K -224.81% -460.72% -- -$167.7K
MT.V
M3 Metals Corp.
-$200 -$99.7K -34.06% -34.06% -- -$118.2K
RXM.CX
Rockex Mining Corp.
-$200 -$178.1K -- -- -- $246.3K

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns LIF.TO or ARS.CX?

    Ares Strategic Mining, Inc. has a net margin of 69.43% compared to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s net margin of --. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of 17.13% beat Ares Strategic Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    96.54% $0.48 $644.8M
    ARS.CX
    Ares Strategic Mining, Inc.
    -- -$0.01 $51M
  • What do Analysts Say About LIF.TO or ARS.CX?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of $30.30, signalling downside risk potential of -1.24%. On the other hand Ares Strategic Mining, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -1.08%. Given that Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has more downside risk than Ares Strategic Mining, Inc., analysts believe Ares Strategic Mining, Inc. is more attractive than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    0 5 0
    ARS.CX
    Ares Strategic Mining, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is LIF.TO or ARS.CX More Risky?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.314% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ares Strategic Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIF.TO or ARS.CX?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.05%. Ares Strategic Mining, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. pays 109.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Ares Strategic Mining, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LIF.TO or ARS.CX?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $43.9M, which are larger than Ares Strategic Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s net income of $30.4M is higher than Ares Strategic Mining, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.80x while Ares Strategic Mining, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. is 10.73x versus -- for Ares Strategic Mining, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    10.73x 17.80x $43.9M $30.4M
    ARS.CX
    Ares Strategic Mining, Inc.
    -- -- -- -$1.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns LIF.TO or BKI.TO?

    Black Iron, Inc. has a net margin of 69.43% compared to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s net margin of --. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of 17.13% beat Black Iron, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    96.54% $0.48 $644.8M
    BKI.TO
    Black Iron, Inc.
    -- -$0.00 -$3.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About LIF.TO or BKI.TO?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of $30.30, signalling downside risk potential of -1.24%. On the other hand Black Iron, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1169.23%. Given that Black Iron, Inc. has higher upside potential than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp., analysts believe Black Iron, Inc. is more attractive than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    0 5 0
    BKI.TO
    Black Iron, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is LIF.TO or BKI.TO More Risky?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.314% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Black Iron, Inc. has a beta of 1.862, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.231%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIF.TO or BKI.TO?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.05%. Black Iron, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. pays 109.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Iron, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LIF.TO or BKI.TO?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $43.9M, which are larger than Black Iron, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s net income of $30.4M is higher than Black Iron, Inc.'s net income of -$591.6K. Notably, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.80x while Black Iron, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. is 10.73x versus -- for Black Iron, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    10.73x 17.80x $43.9M $30.4M
    BKI.TO
    Black Iron, Inc.
    -- -- -- -$591.6K
  • Which has Higher Returns LIF.TO or FEO.V?

    Oceanic Iron Ore Corp. has a net margin of 69.43% compared to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s net margin of --. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of 17.13% beat Oceanic Iron Ore Corp.'s return on equity of -460.72%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    96.54% $0.48 $644.8M
    FEO.V
    Oceanic Iron Ore Corp.
    -- -$0.72 $45M
  • What do Analysts Say About LIF.TO or FEO.V?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of $30.30, signalling downside risk potential of -1.24%. On the other hand Oceanic Iron Ore Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Oceanic Iron Ore Corp., analysts believe Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Oceanic Iron Ore Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    0 5 0
    FEO.V
    Oceanic Iron Ore Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is LIF.TO or FEO.V More Risky?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.314% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceanic Iron Ore Corp. has a beta of 2.580, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.039%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIF.TO or FEO.V?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.05%. Oceanic Iron Ore Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. pays 109.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceanic Iron Ore Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LIF.TO or FEO.V?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $43.9M, which are larger than Oceanic Iron Ore Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s net income of $30.4M is higher than Oceanic Iron Ore Corp.'s net income of -$88.9M. Notably, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.80x while Oceanic Iron Ore Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. is 10.73x versus -- for Oceanic Iron Ore Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    10.73x 17.80x $43.9M $30.4M
    FEO.V
    Oceanic Iron Ore Corp.
    -- 5.06x -- -$88.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns LIF.TO or MT.V?

    M3 Metals Corp. has a net margin of 69.43% compared to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s net margin of --. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of 17.13% beat M3 Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -34.06%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    96.54% $0.48 $644.8M
    MT.V
    M3 Metals Corp.
    -- -$0.02 $2.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About LIF.TO or MT.V?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of $30.30, signalling downside risk potential of -1.24%. On the other hand M3 Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than M3 Metals Corp., analysts believe Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. is more attractive than M3 Metals Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    0 5 0
    MT.V
    M3 Metals Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is LIF.TO or MT.V More Risky?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.314% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison M3 Metals Corp. has a beta of -0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 166.392%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIF.TO or MT.V?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.05%. M3 Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. pays 109.69% of its earnings as a dividend. M3 Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LIF.TO or MT.V?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $43.9M, which are larger than M3 Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s net income of $30.4M is higher than M3 Metals Corp.'s net income of -$222.1K. Notably, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.80x while M3 Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. is 10.73x versus -- for M3 Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    10.73x 17.80x $43.9M $30.4M
    MT.V
    M3 Metals Corp.
    -- 8.75x -- -$222.1K
  • Which has Higher Returns LIF.TO or RXM.CX?

    Rockex Mining Corp. has a net margin of 69.43% compared to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s net margin of --. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of 17.13% beat Rockex Mining Corp.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    96.54% $0.48 $644.8M
    RXM.CX
    Rockex Mining Corp.
    -- -$0.00 -$4.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About LIF.TO or RXM.CX?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of $30.30, signalling downside risk potential of -1.24%. On the other hand Rockex Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Rockex Mining Corp., analysts believe Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Rockex Mining Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    0 5 0
    RXM.CX
    Rockex Mining Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is LIF.TO or RXM.CX More Risky?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.314% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rockex Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.073%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIF.TO or RXM.CX?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.05%. Rockex Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. pays 109.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Rockex Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LIF.TO or RXM.CX?

    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $43.9M, which are larger than Rockex Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s net income of $30.4M is higher than Rockex Mining Corp.'s net income of -$42.7K. Notably, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.80x while Rockex Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. is 10.73x versus -- for Rockex Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LIF.TO
    Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
    10.73x 17.80x $43.9M $30.4M
    RXM.CX
    Rockex Mining Corp.
    -- 2.75x -- -$42.7K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?

In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…

Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?

AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?

In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x

Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
65
RGC alert for Jan 9

Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 10.55% over the past day.

Buy
58
KRUS alert for Jan 9

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. [KRUS] is up 6.41% over the past day.

Buy
53
PBF alert for Jan 9

PBF Energy, Inc. [PBF] is up 1.96% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock