JWEL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CENTR Brands Corp. has a net margin of 7.78% compared to Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s net margin of -1601.07%. Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.09% beat CENTR Brands Corp.'s return on equity of -674.23%.

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has a consensus price target of $42.92, signalling upside risk potential of 30.17%. On the other hand CENTR Brands Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has higher upside potential than CENTR Brands Corp., analysts believe Jamieson Wellness, Inc. is more attractive than CENTR Brands Corp..

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has a beta of 0.874, which suggesting that the stock is 12.619% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CENTR Brands Corp. has a beta of -3.753, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 475.287%.

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. CENTR Brands Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamieson Wellness, Inc. pays 64.08% of its earnings as a dividend. CENTR Brands Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. quarterly revenues are $199.3M, which are larger than CENTR Brands Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s net income of $15.5M is higher than CENTR Brands Corp.'s net income of -$37.9K. Notably, Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.82x while CENTR Brands Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamieson Wellness, Inc. is 1.79x versus -- for CENTR Brands Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forte Group Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 7.78% compared to Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s net margin of -8012.46%. Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.09% beat Forte Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -913.37%.

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has a consensus price target of $42.92, signalling upside risk potential of 30.17%. On the other hand Forte Group Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has higher upside potential than Forte Group Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Jamieson Wellness, Inc. is more attractive than Forte Group Holdings, Inc..

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has a beta of 0.874, which suggesting that the stock is 12.619% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forte Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.311, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.053%.

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. Forte Group Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamieson Wellness, Inc. pays 64.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Forte Group Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. quarterly revenues are $199.3M, which are larger than Forte Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $30.5K. Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s net income of $15.5M is higher than Forte Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.82x while Forte Group Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamieson Wellness, Inc. is 1.79x versus 38.38x for Forte Group Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HYTN Innovations, Inc. has a net margin of 7.78% compared to Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s net margin of -55.36%. Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.09% beat HYTN Innovations, Inc.'s return on equity of -82266.56%.

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has a consensus price target of $42.92, signalling upside risk potential of 30.17%. On the other hand HYTN Innovations, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has higher upside potential than HYTN Innovations, Inc., analysts believe Jamieson Wellness, Inc. is more attractive than HYTN Innovations, Inc..

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has a beta of 0.874, which suggesting that the stock is 12.619% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HYTN Innovations, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. HYTN Innovations, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamieson Wellness, Inc. pays 64.08% of its earnings as a dividend. HYTN Innovations, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. quarterly revenues are $199.3M, which are larger than HYTN Innovations, Inc. quarterly revenues of $487K. Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s net income of $15.5M is higher than HYTN Innovations, Inc.'s net income of -$269.6K. Notably, Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.82x while HYTN Innovations, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamieson Wellness, Inc. is 1.79x versus 12.13x for HYTN Innovations, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBD Capital Corp. has a net margin of 7.78% compared to Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s net margin of -2561.54%. Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.09% beat SBD Capital Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has a consensus price target of $42.92, signalling upside risk potential of 30.17%. On the other hand SBD Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has higher upside potential than SBD Capital Corp., analysts believe Jamieson Wellness, Inc. is more attractive than SBD Capital Corp..

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has a beta of 0.874, which suggesting that the stock is 12.619% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBD Capital Corp. has a beta of -0.674, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 167.427%.

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. SBD Capital Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamieson Wellness, Inc. pays 64.08% of its earnings as a dividend. SBD Capital Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jamieson Wellness, Inc. quarterly revenues are $199.3M, which are larger than SBD Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3K. Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s net income of $15.5M is higher than SBD Capital Corp.'s net income of -$33.3K. Notably, Jamieson Wellness, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.82x while SBD Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamieson Wellness, Inc. is 1.79x versus 42.50x for SBD Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.