Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Buy
52
JAPN.B.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$42.31
Seasonality move
:
1.37%
Day range:
$42.28 - $42.35
52-week range:
$31.20 - $43.02
Dividend yield:
2.26%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.5K
Avg. volume:
1.7K
1-year change:
22.07%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JAPN.B.TO
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CJP.NO
iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLJA.TO
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XID.TO
iShares India Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZID.TO
BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JAPN.B.TO
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged
|
$42.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 2.26% | -- |
|
CJP.NO
iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FLJA.TO
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
XID.TO
iShares India Index ETF
|
$55.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.17% | -- |
|
ZID.TO
BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF
|
$50.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0.28% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JAPN.B.TO
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged
|
-- | 0.457 | -- | -- |
|
CJP.NO
iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
FLJA.TO
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
XID.TO
iShares India Index ETF
|
-- | -0.105 | -- | -- |
|
ZID.TO
BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF
|
-- | -0.135 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JAPN.B.TO
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CJP.NO
iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLJA.TO
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XID.TO
iShares India Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZID.TO
BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns JAPN.B.TO or CJP.NO?
iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm has a net margin of -- compared to CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's net margin of --. CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's return on equity of -- beat iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JAPN.B.TOCI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- CJP.NOiShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JAPN.B.TO or CJP.NO?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has higher upside potential than iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm, analysts believe CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged is more attractive than iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JAPN.B.TOCI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged0 0 0 CJP.NOiShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm0 0 0 -
Is JAPN.B.TO or CJP.NO More Risky?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JAPN.B.TO or CJP.NO?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JAPN.B.TO or CJP.NO?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm quarterly revenues of --. CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's net income of -- is lower than iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm's net income of --. Notably, CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged is -- versus -- for iShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JAPN.B.TOCI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- -- CJP.NOiShares Japan Fundamental ETF CADH Comm-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns JAPN.B.TO or FLJA.TO?
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's net margin of --. CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE Japan ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JAPN.B.TOCI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- FLJA.TOFranklin FTSE Japan ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JAPN.B.TO or FLJA.TO?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE Japan ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE Japan ETF, analysts believe CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged is more attractive than Franklin FTSE Japan ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JAPN.B.TOCI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged0 0 0 FLJA.TOFranklin FTSE Japan ETF0 0 0 -
Is JAPN.B.TO or FLJA.TO More Risky?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE Japan ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JAPN.B.TO or FLJA.TO?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Franklin FTSE Japan ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE Japan ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JAPN.B.TO or FLJA.TO?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE Japan ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE Japan ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE Japan ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JAPN.B.TOCI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- -- FLJA.TOFranklin FTSE Japan ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns JAPN.B.TO or XID.TO?
iShares India Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's net margin of --. CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's return on equity of -- beat iShares India Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JAPN.B.TOCI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- XID.TOiShares India Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JAPN.B.TO or XID.TO?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares India Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has higher upside potential than iShares India Index ETF, analysts believe CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged is more attractive than iShares India Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JAPN.B.TOCI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged0 0 0 XID.TOiShares India Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is JAPN.B.TO or XID.TO More Risky?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares India Index ETF has a beta of 0.236, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.394%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JAPN.B.TO or XID.TO?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. iShares India Index ETF offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares India Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JAPN.B.TO or XID.TO?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares India Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's net income of -- is lower than iShares India Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares India Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged is -- versus -- for iShares India Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JAPN.B.TOCI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- -- XID.TOiShares India Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns JAPN.B.TO or ZID.TO?
BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's net margin of --. CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's return on equity of -- beat BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JAPN.B.TOCI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- ZID.TOBMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JAPN.B.TO or ZID.TO?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has higher upside potential than BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF, analysts believe CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged is more attractive than BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JAPN.B.TOCI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged0 0 0 ZID.TOBMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is JAPN.B.TO or ZID.TO More Risky?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF has a beta of 0.363, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.658%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JAPN.B.TO or ZID.TO?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF offers a yield of 0.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JAPN.B.TO or ZID.TO?
CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's net income of -- is lower than BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged is -- versus -- for BMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JAPN.B.TOCI Japan Equity Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- -- ZID.TOBMO MSCI India Selection Equity Index ETF-- -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
