IFC.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Sol Strategies, Inc. has a net margin of 11.12% compared to Intact Financial Corp.'s net margin of -324.27%. Intact Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 16.36% beat Sol Strategies, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.19%.

Intact Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $319.92, signalling upside risk potential of 12.05%. On the other hand Sol Strategies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1108.33%. Given that Sol Strategies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Intact Financial Corp., analysts believe Sol Strategies, Inc. is more attractive than Intact Financial Corp..

Intact Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.260, which suggesting that the stock is 74.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sol Strategies, Inc. has a beta of 2.695, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.514%.

Intact Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Sol Strategies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intact Financial Corp. pays 39.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Sol Strategies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intact Financial Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intact Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $7.7B, which are larger than Sol Strategies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Intact Financial Corp.'s net income of $861M is higher than Sol Strategies, Inc.'s net income of -$8.2M. Notably, Intact Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.11x while Sol Strategies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intact Financial Corp. is 1.73x versus 9.87x for Sol Strategies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Wellness Strategies has a net margin of 11.12% compared to Intact Financial Corp.'s net margin of --. Intact Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 16.36% beat Global Wellness Strategies's return on equity of --.

Intact Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $319.92, signalling upside risk potential of 12.05%. On the other hand Global Wellness Strategies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Intact Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than Global Wellness Strategies, analysts believe Intact Financial Corp. is more attractive than Global Wellness Strategies.

Intact Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.260, which suggesting that the stock is 74.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Wellness Strategies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intact Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Global Wellness Strategies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intact Financial Corp. pays 39.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Wellness Strategies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intact Financial Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intact Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $7.7B, which are larger than Global Wellness Strategies quarterly revenues of --. Intact Financial Corp.'s net income of $861M is higher than Global Wellness Strategies's net income of --. Notably, Intact Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.11x while Global Wellness Strategies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intact Financial Corp. is 1.73x versus -- for Global Wellness Strategies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Toronto-Dominion Bank has a net margin of 11.12% compared to Intact Financial Corp.'s net margin of 11.32%. Intact Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 16.36% beat The Toronto-Dominion Bank's return on equity of 16.74%.

Intact Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $319.92, signalling upside risk potential of 12.05%. On the other hand The Toronto-Dominion Bank has an analysts' consensus of $127.87 which suggests that it could fall by -0.09%. Given that Intact Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than The Toronto-Dominion Bank, analysts believe Intact Financial Corp. is more attractive than The Toronto-Dominion Bank.

Intact Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.260, which suggesting that the stock is 74.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Toronto-Dominion Bank has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.405%.

Intact Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. The Toronto-Dominion Bank offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Intact Financial Corp. pays 39.1% of its earnings as a dividend. The Toronto-Dominion Bank pays out 36.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intact Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $7.7B, which are smaller than The Toronto-Dominion Bank quarterly revenues of $29B. Intact Financial Corp.'s net income of $861M is lower than The Toronto-Dominion Bank's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Intact Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.11x while The Toronto-Dominion Bank's PE ratio is 11.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intact Financial Corp. is 1.73x versus 1.78x for The Toronto-Dominion Bank. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has a net margin of 11.12% compared to Intact Financial Corp.'s net margin of --. Intact Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 16.36% beat New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Intact Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $319.92, signalling upside risk potential of 12.05%. On the other hand New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Intact Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than New Frontier Ventures, Inc., analysts believe Intact Financial Corp. is more attractive than New Frontier Ventures, Inc..

Intact Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.260, which suggesting that the stock is 74.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has a beta of -0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.578%.

Intact Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. New Frontier Ventures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intact Financial Corp. pays 39.1% of its earnings as a dividend. New Frontier Ventures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intact Financial Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intact Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $7.7B, which are larger than New Frontier Ventures, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Intact Financial Corp.'s net income of $861M is higher than New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s net income of -$10.5K. Notably, Intact Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.11x while New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intact Financial Corp. is 1.73x versus 29.93x for New Frontier Ventures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.