Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Sell
28
HUTE.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.94
Seasonality move
:
-1.1%
Day range:
$10.93 - $11.08
52-week range:
$9.00 - $11.47
Dividend yield:
9.65%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
13K
Avg. volume:
21.3K
1-year change:
1.2%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HUTE.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ARB.TO
Accelerate Arbitrage Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGLS.NO
Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HDGE.TO
Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHE.B.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HUTE.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF
|
$10.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 9.65% | -- |
|
ARB.TO
Accelerate Arbitrage Fund
|
$28.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 3.7% | -- |
|
FGLS.NO
Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
HDGE.TO
Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund
|
$27.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 1.45% | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
$17.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 11.04% | -- |
|
PHE.B.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH
|
$45.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.67 | 1.48% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HUTE.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF
|
-- | 0.355 | -- | -- |
|
ARB.TO
Accelerate Arbitrage Fund
|
-- | -0.028 | -- | -- |
|
FGLS.NO
Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
HDGE.TO
Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund
|
-- | 0.902 | -- | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
-- | 1.292 | -- | -- |
|
PHE.B.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH
|
-- | 0.628 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HUTE.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ARB.TO
Accelerate Arbitrage Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGLS.NO
Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HDGE.TO
Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHE.B.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HUTE.TO or ARB.TO?
Accelerate Arbitrage Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's net margin of --. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's return on equity of -- beat Accelerate Arbitrage Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF-- -- -- ARB.TOAccelerate Arbitrage Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HUTE.TO or ARB.TO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Accelerate Arbitrage Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has higher upside potential than Accelerate Arbitrage Fund, analysts believe Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF is more attractive than Accelerate Arbitrage Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF0 0 0 ARB.TOAccelerate Arbitrage Fund0 0 0 -
Is HUTE.TO or ARB.TO More Risky?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Accelerate Arbitrage Fund has a beta of 0.003, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.673%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUTE.TO or ARB.TO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.65%. Accelerate Arbitrage Fund offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Accelerate Arbitrage Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HUTE.TO or ARB.TO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Accelerate Arbitrage Fund quarterly revenues of --. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's net income of -- is lower than Accelerate Arbitrage Fund's net income of --. Notably, Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Accelerate Arbitrage Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF is -- versus -- for Accelerate Arbitrage Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF-- -- -- -- ARB.TOAccelerate Arbitrage Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HUTE.TO or FGLS.NO?
Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's net margin of --. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF-- -- -- FGLS.NOFidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HUTE.TO or FGLS.NO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF, analysts believe Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF0 0 0 FGLS.NOFidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF0 0 0 -
Is HUTE.TO or FGLS.NO More Risky?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUTE.TO or FGLS.NO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.65%. Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HUTE.TO or FGLS.NO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF quarterly revenues of --. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF's net income of --. Notably, Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF-- -- -- -- FGLS.NOFidelity Global Value Long/Short ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HUTE.TO or HDGE.TO?
Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's net margin of --. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's return on equity of -- beat Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF-- -- -- HDGE.TOAccelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HUTE.TO or HDGE.TO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has higher upside potential than Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund, analysts believe Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF is more attractive than Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF0 0 0 HDGE.TOAccelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund0 0 0 -
Is HUTE.TO or HDGE.TO More Risky?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund has a beta of 0.242, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.767%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUTE.TO or HDGE.TO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.65%. Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HUTE.TO or HDGE.TO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund quarterly revenues of --. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's net income of -- is lower than Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund's net income of --. Notably, Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF is -- versus -- for Accelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF-- -- -- -- HDGE.TOAccelerate Absolute Return Hedge Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HUTE.TO or HTAE.TO?
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's net margin of --. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's return on equity of -- beat Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF-- -- -- HTAE.TOHarvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HUTE.TO or HTAE.TO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has higher upside potential than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF, analysts believe Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF is more attractive than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF0 0 0 HTAE.TOHarvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is HUTE.TO or HTAE.TO More Risky?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUTE.TO or HTAE.TO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.65%. Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF offers a yield of 11.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HUTE.TO or HTAE.TO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's net income of -- is lower than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF is -- versus -- for Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF-- -- -- -- HTAE.TOHarvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HUTE.TO or PHE.B.TO?
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH has a net margin of -- compared to Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's net margin of --. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF-- -- -- PHE.B.TOPurpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HUTE.TO or PHE.B.TO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has higher upside potential than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH, analysts believe Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF is more attractive than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF0 0 0 PHE.B.TOPurpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH0 0 0 -
Is HUTE.TO or PHE.B.TO More Risky?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH has a beta of 0.371, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.854%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUTE.TO or PHE.B.TO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.65%. Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HUTE.TO or PHE.B.TO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH quarterly revenues of --. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH's net income of --. Notably, Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF is -- versus -- for Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HUTE.TOHarvest Equal Weight Global Utilities En In ETF-- -- -- -- PHE.B.TOPurpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
