GMIN.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a net margin of 56.53% compared to G Mining Ventures's net margin of 25.53%. G Mining Ventures's return on equity of -- beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International's return on equity of -167.71%.

G Mining Ventures has a consensus price target of $16.86, signalling upside risk potential of 57.85%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that G Mining Ventures has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, analysts believe G Mining Ventures is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International.

G Mining Ventures has a beta of -0.229, which suggesting that the stock is 122.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

G Mining Ventures has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. G Mining Ventures pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

G Mining Ventures quarterly revenues are $58.7M, which are larger than Bee Vectoring Technologies International quarterly revenues of $81.9K. G Mining Ventures's net income of $33.2M is higher than Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net income of $20.9K. Notably, G Mining Ventures's price-to-earnings ratio is 19,524.68x while Bee Vectoring Technologies International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for G Mining Ventures is -- versus 1.37x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding has a net margin of 56.53% compared to G Mining Ventures's net margin of 83.06%. G Mining Ventures's return on equity of -- beat Replenish Nutrients Holding's return on equity of -1.35%.

G Mining Ventures has a consensus price target of $16.86, signalling upside risk potential of 57.85%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1025%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding has higher upside potential than G Mining Ventures, analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding is more attractive than G Mining Ventures.

G Mining Ventures has a beta of -0.229, which suggesting that the stock is 122.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding has a beta of 1.133, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.276%.

G Mining Ventures has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. G Mining Ventures pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

G Mining Ventures quarterly revenues are $58.7M, which are larger than Replenish Nutrients Holding quarterly revenues of $2.1M. G Mining Ventures's net income of $33.2M is higher than Replenish Nutrients Holding's net income of $1.8M. Notably, G Mining Ventures's price-to-earnings ratio is 19,524.68x while Replenish Nutrients Holding's PE ratio is 67.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for G Mining Ventures is -- versus 0.72x for Replenish Nutrients Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 56.53% compared to G Mining Ventures's net margin of 55.39%. G Mining Ventures's return on equity of -- beat Franco-Nevada's return on equity of -10.11%.

G Mining Ventures has a consensus price target of $16.86, signalling upside risk potential of 57.85%. On the other hand Franco-Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $208.75 which suggests that it could grow by 23.63%. Given that G Mining Ventures has higher upside potential than Franco-Nevada, analysts believe G Mining Ventures is more attractive than Franco-Nevada.

G Mining Ventures has a beta of -0.229, which suggesting that the stock is 122.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.194%.

G Mining Ventures has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franco-Nevada offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. G Mining Ventures pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franco-Nevada pays out -49.96% of its earnings as a dividend.

G Mining Ventures quarterly revenues are $58.7M, which are smaller than Franco-Nevada quarterly revenues of $376.2M. G Mining Ventures's net income of $33.2M is lower than Franco-Nevada's net income of $208.3M. Notably, G Mining Ventures's price-to-earnings ratio is 19,524.68x while Franco-Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for G Mining Ventures is -- versus 21.79x for Franco-Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Organic Potash has a net margin of 56.53% compared to G Mining Ventures's net margin of --. G Mining Ventures's return on equity of -- beat Organic Potash's return on equity of --.

G Mining Ventures has a consensus price target of $16.86, signalling upside risk potential of 57.85%. On the other hand Organic Potash has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that G Mining Ventures has higher upside potential than Organic Potash, analysts believe G Mining Ventures is more attractive than Organic Potash.

G Mining Ventures has a beta of -0.229, which suggesting that the stock is 122.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash has a beta of 0.508, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.183%.

G Mining Ventures has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. G Mining Ventures pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

G Mining Ventures quarterly revenues are $58.7M, which are larger than Organic Potash quarterly revenues of --. G Mining Ventures's net income of $33.2M is higher than Organic Potash's net income of -$23.7K. Notably, G Mining Ventures's price-to-earnings ratio is 19,524.68x while Organic Potash's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for G Mining Ventures is -- versus -- for Organic Potash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.