Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
50
GIB.A.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$130.73
Seasonality move
:
4.93%
Day range:
$126.77 - $131.97
52-week range:
$117.71 - $175.35
Dividend yield:
0.47%
P/E ratio:
17.81x
P/S ratio:
1.85x
P/B ratio:
2.75x
Volume:
617.6K
Avg. volume:
517.8K
1-year change:
-16.61%
Market cap:
$28.3B
Revenue:
$15.9B
EPS (TTM):
$7.35
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIB.A.TO
CGI, Inc.
|
$4.1B | $2.12 | 7.68% | 10.46% | $154.25 |
|
CSU.TO
Constellation Software, Inc.
|
$4.3B | $38.47 | 14.25% | 104.62% | $4,826.52 |
|
DCBO.TO
Docebo, Inc.
|
$85.4M | $0.49 | 7% | -8.94% | $49.63 |
|
KXS.TO
Kinaxis, Inc.
|
$192.6M | $1.25 | 11.14% | 269.56% | $224.73 |
|
NERD.CX
Nerds On Site, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OTEX.TO
Open Text Corp.
|
$1.8B | $1.41 | -5.48% | 16.05% | $50.09 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIB.A.TO
CGI, Inc.
|
$130.93 | $154.25 | $28.3B | 17.81x | $0.17 | 0.47% | 1.85x |
|
CSU.TO
Constellation Software, Inc.
|
$3,311.96 | $4,826.52 | $70.2B | 75.34x | $1.38 | 0.17% | 4.50x |
|
DCBO.TO
Docebo, Inc.
|
$30.48 | $49.63 | $875.8M | 29.51x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.80x |
|
KXS.TO
Kinaxis, Inc.
|
$175.48 | $224.73 | $4.9B | 105.24x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.81x |
|
NERD.CX
Nerds On Site, Inc.
|
$0.05 | -- | $4.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.35x |
|
OTEX.TO
Open Text Corp.
|
$44.98 | $50.09 | $11.3B | 16.86x | $0.39 | 3.34% | 1.61x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIB.A.TO
CGI, Inc.
|
29.64% | 0.939 | 16.04% | 0.70x |
|
CSU.TO
Constellation Software, Inc.
|
61.07% | -0.700 | 9.39% | 0.86x |
|
DCBO.TO
Docebo, Inc.
|
6.03% | 0.045 | 0.37% | 0.90x |
|
KXS.TO
Kinaxis, Inc.
|
9.88% | -0.644 | 1.35% | 2.13x |
|
NERD.CX
Nerds On Site, Inc.
|
-297.56% | 1.024 | 79.16% | 0.41x |
|
OTEX.TO
Open Text Corp.
|
62.67% | 1.805 | 70.39% | 0.72x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIB.A.TO
CGI, Inc.
|
$748.5M | $748.5M | 11.91% | 16.6% | 18.65% | $582.5M |
|
CSU.TO
Constellation Software, Inc.
|
$1.1B | $680.4M | 8.31% | 19.46% | 16.76% | $855.6M |
|
DCBO.TO
Docebo, Inc.
|
$67.1M | $11.2M | 45.95% | 47.69% | 13.22% | $7.3M |
|
KXS.TO
Kinaxis, Inc.
|
$111M | $26.2M | 7.4% | 8.27% | 14.13% | $45M |
|
NERD.CX
Nerds On Site, Inc.
|
$755.4K | -$89.8K | -- | -- | -2.81% | -$131.6K |
|
OTEX.TO
Open Text Corp.
|
$1.1B | $399.3M | 4.65% | 12.23% | 22.51% | $139.4M |
CGI, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GIB.A.TO or CSU.TO?
Constellation Software, Inc. has a net margin of 9.5% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of 5.5%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.6% beat Constellation Software, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.46%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.18.65% $1.72 $14.6B CSU.TOConstellation Software, Inc.25.98% $13.65 $13.3B -
What do Analysts Say About GIB.A.TO or CSU.TO?
CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $154.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.81%. On the other hand Constellation Software, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4,826.52 which suggests that it could grow by 45.73%. Given that Constellation Software, Inc. has higher upside potential than CGI, Inc., analysts believe Constellation Software, Inc. is more attractive than CGI, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.4 3 0 CSU.TOConstellation Software, Inc.7 2 0 -
Is GIB.A.TO or CSU.TO More Risky?
CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.393, which suggesting that the stock is 60.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Software, Inc. has a beta of 0.761, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.914%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIB.A.TO or CSU.TO?
CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Constellation Software, Inc. offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.38 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Software, Inc. pays out 11.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIB.A.TO or CSU.TO?
CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Constellation Software, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.1B. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $381.4M is higher than Constellation Software, Inc.'s net income of $223.1M. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.81x while Constellation Software, Inc.'s PE ratio is 75.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.85x versus 4.50x for Constellation Software, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.1.85x 17.81x $4B $381.4M CSU.TOConstellation Software, Inc.4.50x 75.34x $4.1B $223.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns GIB.A.TO or DCBO.TO?
Docebo, Inc. has a net margin of 9.5% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of 9.91%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.6% beat Docebo, Inc.'s return on equity of 47.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.18.65% $1.72 $14.6B DCBO.TODocebo, Inc.79.11% $0.29 $67M -
What do Analysts Say About GIB.A.TO or DCBO.TO?
CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $154.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.81%. On the other hand Docebo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $49.63 which suggests that it could grow by 62.81%. Given that Docebo, Inc. has higher upside potential than CGI, Inc., analysts believe Docebo, Inc. is more attractive than CGI, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.4 3 0 DCBO.TODocebo, Inc.7 2 0 -
Is GIB.A.TO or DCBO.TO More Risky?
CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.393, which suggesting that the stock is 60.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Docebo, Inc. has a beta of 0.955, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.495%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIB.A.TO or DCBO.TO?
CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Docebo, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Docebo, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIB.A.TO or DCBO.TO?
CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Docebo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $84.9M. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $381.4M is higher than Docebo, Inc.'s net income of $8.4M. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.81x while Docebo, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.85x versus 2.80x for Docebo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.1.85x 17.81x $4B $381.4M DCBO.TODocebo, Inc.2.80x 29.51x $84.9M $8.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns GIB.A.TO or KXS.TO?
Kinaxis, Inc. has a net margin of 9.5% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of 12.52%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.6% beat Kinaxis, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.27%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.18.65% $1.72 $14.6B KXS.TOKinaxis, Inc.59.86% $0.80 $690.2M -
What do Analysts Say About GIB.A.TO or KXS.TO?
CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $154.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.81%. On the other hand Kinaxis, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $224.73 which suggests that it could grow by 28.06%. Given that Kinaxis, Inc. has higher upside potential than CGI, Inc., analysts believe Kinaxis, Inc. is more attractive than CGI, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.4 3 0 KXS.TOKinaxis, Inc.5 2 0 -
Is GIB.A.TO or KXS.TO More Risky?
CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.393, which suggesting that the stock is 60.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinaxis, Inc. has a beta of 0.790, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.05%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIB.A.TO or KXS.TO?
CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Kinaxis, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinaxis, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIB.A.TO or KXS.TO?
CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Kinaxis, Inc. quarterly revenues of $185.4M. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $381.4M is higher than Kinaxis, Inc.'s net income of $23.2M. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.81x while Kinaxis, Inc.'s PE ratio is 105.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.85x versus 6.81x for Kinaxis, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.1.85x 17.81x $4B $381.4M KXS.TOKinaxis, Inc.6.81x 105.24x $185.4M $23.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns GIB.A.TO or NERD.CX?
Nerds On Site, Inc. has a net margin of 9.5% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of -6.67%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.6% beat Nerds On Site, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.18.65% $1.72 $14.6B NERD.CXNerds On Site, Inc.23.62% -$0.00 -$664.5K -
What do Analysts Say About GIB.A.TO or NERD.CX?
CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $154.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.81%. On the other hand Nerds On Site, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nerds On Site, Inc., analysts believe CGI, Inc. is more attractive than Nerds On Site, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.4 3 0 NERD.CXNerds On Site, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GIB.A.TO or NERD.CX More Risky?
CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.393, which suggesting that the stock is 60.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nerds On Site, Inc. has a beta of 2.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.287%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIB.A.TO or NERD.CX?
CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Nerds On Site, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Nerds On Site, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIB.A.TO or NERD.CX?
CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Nerds On Site, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2M. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $381.4M is higher than Nerds On Site, Inc.'s net income of -$213.4K. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.81x while Nerds On Site, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.85x versus 0.35x for Nerds On Site, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.1.85x 17.81x $4B $381.4M NERD.CXNerds On Site, Inc.0.35x -- $3.2M -$213.4K
-
Which has Higher Returns GIB.A.TO or OTEX.TO?
Open Text Corp. has a net margin of 9.5% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of 11.39%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.6% beat Open Text Corp.'s return on equity of 12.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.18.65% $1.72 $14.6B OTEX.TOOpen Text Corp.63.82% $0.80 $14.7B -
What do Analysts Say About GIB.A.TO or OTEX.TO?
CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $154.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.81%. On the other hand Open Text Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $50.09 which suggests that it could grow by 11.37%. Given that CGI, Inc. has higher upside potential than Open Text Corp., analysts believe CGI, Inc. is more attractive than Open Text Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.4 3 0 OTEX.TOOpen Text Corp.0 9 0 -
Is GIB.A.TO or OTEX.TO More Risky?
CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.393, which suggesting that the stock is 60.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Open Text Corp. has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.971%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIB.A.TO or OTEX.TO?
CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Open Text Corp. offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Open Text Corp. pays out 63.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIB.A.TO or OTEX.TO?
CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Open Text Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $381.4M is higher than Open Text Corp.'s net income of $202M. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.81x while Open Text Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.85x versus 1.61x for Open Text Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIB.A.TOCGI, Inc.1.85x 17.81x $4B $381.4M OTEX.TOOpen Text Corp.1.61x 16.86x $1.8B $202M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
65
RGC alert for Jan 9
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 10.55% over the past day.
Buy
58
KRUS alert for Jan 9
Kura Sushi USA, Inc. [KRUS] is up 6.41% over the past day.
Buy
53
PBF alert for Jan 9
PBF Energy, Inc. [PBF] is up 1.96% over the past day.
