GIB.A.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nerds On Site has a net margin of 11.91% compared to CGI's net margin of -1.47%. CGI's return on equity of 19.2% beat Nerds On Site's return on equity of --.

CGI has a consensus price target of $170.43, signalling upside risk potential of 8.22%. On the other hand Nerds On Site has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI has higher upside potential than Nerds On Site, analysts believe CGI is more attractive than Nerds On Site.

CGI has a beta of 0.837, which suggesting that the stock is 16.263% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nerds On Site has a beta of 1.950, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.038%.

CGI has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Nerds On Site offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nerds On Site pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CGI quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Nerds On Site quarterly revenues of $2.9M. CGI's net income of $435.9M is higher than Nerds On Site's net income of -$43.2K. Notably, CGI's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.52x while Nerds On Site's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI is 2.49x versus 0.56x for Nerds On Site. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New World Solutions has a net margin of 11.91% compared to CGI's net margin of -6221.4%. CGI's return on equity of 19.2% beat New World Solutions's return on equity of -143.2%.

CGI has a consensus price target of $170.43, signalling upside risk potential of 8.22%. On the other hand New World Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI has higher upside potential than New World Solutions, analysts believe CGI is more attractive than New World Solutions.

CGI has a beta of 0.837, which suggesting that the stock is 16.263% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New World Solutions has a beta of 3.284, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 228.367%.

CGI has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. New World Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New World Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CGI quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than New World Solutions quarterly revenues of $6.2K. CGI's net income of $435.9M is higher than New World Solutions's net income of -$382.9K. Notably, CGI's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.52x while New World Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI is 2.49x versus -- for New World Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XTM has a net margin of 11.91% compared to CGI's net margin of -172.45%. CGI's return on equity of 19.2% beat XTM's return on equity of --.

CGI has a consensus price target of $170.43, signalling upside risk potential of 8.22%. On the other hand XTM has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI has higher upside potential than XTM, analysts believe CGI is more attractive than XTM.

CGI has a beta of 0.837, which suggesting that the stock is 16.263% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XTM has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CGI has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. XTM offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XTM pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CGI quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than XTM quarterly revenues of $2.4M. CGI's net income of $435.9M is higher than XTM's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, CGI's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.52x while XTM's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI is 2.49x versus 1.71x for XTM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Windfall Geotek has a net margin of 11.91% compared to CGI's net margin of -50.02%. CGI's return on equity of 19.2% beat Windfall Geotek's return on equity of -96.84%.

CGI has a consensus price target of $170.43, signalling upside risk potential of 8.22%. On the other hand Windfall Geotek has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI has higher upside potential than Windfall Geotek, analysts believe CGI is more attractive than Windfall Geotek.

CGI has a beta of 0.837, which suggesting that the stock is 16.263% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Windfall Geotek has a beta of 1.830, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.997%.

CGI has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Windfall Geotek offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Windfall Geotek pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CGI quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Windfall Geotek quarterly revenues of $100K. CGI's net income of $435.9M is higher than Windfall Geotek's net income of -$50K. Notably, CGI's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.52x while Windfall Geotek's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI is 2.49x versus 5.83x for Windfall Geotek. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.