Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Buy
63
FTT.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$73.47
Seasonality move
:
4.02%
Day range:
$72.43 - $73.98
52-week range:
$34.59 - $79.68
Dividend yield:
1.61%
P/E ratio:
18.56x
P/S ratio:
0.89x
P/B ratio:
3.46x
Volume:
1.1M
Avg. volume:
528.8K
1-year change:
101.07%
Market cap:
$9.6B
Revenue:
$11.2B
EPS (TTM):
$3.96
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FTT.TO
Finning International, Inc.
|
$2.6B | $1.03 | -8.83% | 4.15% | $84.44 |
|
BAC.CX
BacTech Environmental Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNA.CX
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FTT.TO
Finning International, Inc.
|
$73.47 | $84.44 | $9.6B | 18.56x | $0.30 | 1.61% | 0.89x |
|
BAC.CX
BacTech Environmental Corp.
|
$0.0350 | -- | $7.6M | 8.00x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies, Inc.
|
$0.29 | -- | $9.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.
|
$0.0500 | -- | $11M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.73x |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems, Inc.
|
$0.07 | -- | $11.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.52x |
|
SNA.CX
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.
|
$0.0100 | -- | $14.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 193.61x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FTT.TO
Finning International, Inc.
|
49.05% | 1.039 | 31.54% | 0.58x |
|
BAC.CX
BacTech Environmental Corp.
|
-104.38% | -2.334 | 17.86% | 0.15x |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies, Inc.
|
40.22% | 6.981 | 6.84% | 1.35x |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.
|
45.95% | 0.984 | 17.7% | 0.32x |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems, Inc.
|
220.82% | 2.912 | 25.03% | 0.53x |
|
SNA.CX
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.
|
-16.05% | -1.522 | 11.21% | 0.00x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FTT.TO
Finning International, Inc.
|
$616M | $234M | 9.61% | 19.05% | 8.23% | -$117M |
|
BAC.CX
BacTech Environmental Corp.
|
-- | -$438.1K | -- | -- | -- | -$374.6K |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies, Inc.
|
-- | -$533.6K | -366.96% | -1749.63% | -- | -$89.8K |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.
|
-$58.4K | -$58.9K | -80.45% | -1082.71% | -20.88% | -$788.3K |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems, Inc.
|
-$269K | -$713.4K | -205.85% | -2612.73% | -85.96% | -$784K |
|
SNA.CX
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.
|
-$28.8K | -$570.2K | -- | -- | -14917.02% | -$846.9K |
Finning International, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FTT.TO or BAC.CX?
BacTech Environmental Corp. has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Finning International, Inc.'s net margin of --. Finning International, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.05% beat BacTech Environmental Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.21.68% $1.16 $5.5B BAC.CXBacTech Environmental Corp.-- -$0.00 -$1.5M -
What do Analysts Say About FTT.TO or BAC.CX?
Finning International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $84.44, signalling upside risk potential of 14.94%. On the other hand BacTech Environmental Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Finning International, Inc. has higher upside potential than BacTech Environmental Corp., analysts believe Finning International, Inc. is more attractive than BacTech Environmental Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.5 1 0 BAC.CXBacTech Environmental Corp.0 0 0 -
Is FTT.TO or BAC.CX More Risky?
Finning International, Inc. has a beta of 1.267, which suggesting that the stock is 26.711% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BacTech Environmental Corp. has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.804%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FTT.TO or BAC.CX?
Finning International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. BacTech Environmental Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Finning International, Inc. pays 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. BacTech Environmental Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Finning International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FTT.TO or BAC.CX?
Finning International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than BacTech Environmental Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Finning International, Inc.'s net income of $154M is higher than BacTech Environmental Corp.'s net income of -$503.3K. Notably, Finning International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.56x while BacTech Environmental Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Finning International, Inc. is 0.89x versus -- for BacTech Environmental Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.0.89x 18.56x $2.8B $154M BAC.CXBacTech Environmental Corp.-- 8.00x -- -$503.3K
-
Which has Higher Returns FTT.TO or DOCT.CX?
Republic Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Finning International, Inc.'s net margin of --. Finning International, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.05% beat Republic Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -1749.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.21.68% $1.16 $5.5B DOCT.CXRepublic Technologies, Inc.-- $0.01 $3.1M -
What do Analysts Say About FTT.TO or DOCT.CX?
Finning International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $84.44, signalling upside risk potential of 14.94%. On the other hand Republic Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Finning International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Republic Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Finning International, Inc. is more attractive than Republic Technologies, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.5 1 0 DOCT.CXRepublic Technologies, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is FTT.TO or DOCT.CX More Risky?
Finning International, Inc. has a beta of 1.267, which suggesting that the stock is 26.711% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.257%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FTT.TO or DOCT.CX?
Finning International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Republic Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Finning International, Inc. pays 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Finning International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FTT.TO or DOCT.CX?
Finning International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Republic Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Finning International, Inc.'s net income of $154M is higher than Republic Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $163.7K. Notably, Finning International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.56x while Republic Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Finning International, Inc. is 0.89x versus -- for Republic Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.0.89x 18.56x $2.8B $154M DOCT.CXRepublic Technologies, Inc.-- -- -- $163.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns FTT.TO or LUX.CX?
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Finning International, Inc.'s net margin of -106.35%. Finning International, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.05% beat Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s return on equity of -1082.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.21.68% $1.16 $5.5B LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures Corp.-20.7% -$0.00 $5.1M -
What do Analysts Say About FTT.TO or LUX.CX?
Finning International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $84.44, signalling upside risk potential of 14.94%. On the other hand Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Finning International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp., analysts believe Finning International, Inc. is more attractive than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.5 1 0 LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures Corp.0 0 0 -
Is FTT.TO or LUX.CX More Risky?
Finning International, Inc. has a beta of 1.267, which suggesting that the stock is 26.711% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has a beta of 2.006, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.604%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FTT.TO or LUX.CX?
Finning International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Finning International, Inc. pays 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Finning International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FTT.TO or LUX.CX?
Finning International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. quarterly revenues of $282.1K. Finning International, Inc.'s net income of $154M is higher than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s net income of -$300K. Notably, Finning International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.56x while Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Finning International, Inc. is 0.89x versus 8.73x for Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.0.89x 18.56x $2.8B $154M LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures Corp.8.73x -- $282.1K -$300K
-
Which has Higher Returns FTT.TO or SHRC.CX?
Sharc International Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Finning International, Inc.'s net margin of -88.58%. Finning International, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.05% beat Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -2612.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.21.68% $1.16 $5.5B SHRC.CXSharc International Systems, Inc.-32.41% -$0.00 $1.6M -
What do Analysts Say About FTT.TO or SHRC.CX?
Finning International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $84.44, signalling upside risk potential of 14.94%. On the other hand Sharc International Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Finning International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sharc International Systems, Inc., analysts believe Finning International, Inc. is more attractive than Sharc International Systems, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.5 1 0 SHRC.CXSharc International Systems, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is FTT.TO or SHRC.CX More Risky?
Finning International, Inc. has a beta of 1.267, which suggesting that the stock is 26.711% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sharc International Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.767%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FTT.TO or SHRC.CX?
Finning International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Sharc International Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Finning International, Inc. pays 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Sharc International Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Finning International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FTT.TO or SHRC.CX?
Finning International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Sharc International Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $829.9K. Finning International, Inc.'s net income of $154M is higher than Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s net income of -$735.1K. Notably, Finning International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.56x while Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Finning International, Inc. is 0.89x versus 4.52x for Sharc International Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.0.89x 18.56x $2.8B $154M SHRC.CXSharc International Systems, Inc.4.52x -- $829.9K -$735.1K
-
Which has Higher Returns FTT.TO or SNA.CX?
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Finning International, Inc.'s net margin of -15244.79%. Finning International, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.05% beat Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.21.68% $1.16 $5.5B SNA.CXStar Navigation Systems Group Ltd.-1899.17% -$0.00 -$5.2M -
What do Analysts Say About FTT.TO or SNA.CX?
Finning International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $84.44, signalling upside risk potential of 14.94%. On the other hand Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Finning International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd., analysts believe Finning International, Inc. is more attractive than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.5 1 0 SNA.CXStar Navigation Systems Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FTT.TO or SNA.CX More Risky?
Finning International, Inc. has a beta of 1.267, which suggesting that the stock is 26.711% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.218, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.805%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FTT.TO or SNA.CX?
Finning International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Finning International, Inc. pays 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Finning International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FTT.TO or SNA.CX?
Finning International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Finning International, Inc.'s net income of $154M is higher than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.'s net income of -$586.9K. Notably, Finning International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.56x while Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Finning International, Inc. is 0.89x versus 193.61x for Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FTT.TOFinning International, Inc.0.89x 18.56x $2.8B $154M SNA.CXStar Navigation Systems Group Ltd.193.61x -- -- -$586.9K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
