FLI.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged has a net margin of -- compared to CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's net margin of --. CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged's return on equity of --.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has higher upside potential than Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged, analysts believe CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged is more attractive than Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.197% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.65%. Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged offers a yield of 10.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged quarterly revenues of --. CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged's net income of --. Notably, CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged is -- versus -- for Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's net margin of --. CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF's return on equity of --.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has higher upside potential than Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF, analysts believe CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged is more attractive than Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.197% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF has a beta of 1.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.941%.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.65%. Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF offers a yield of 4.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged is -- versus -- for Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's net margin of --. CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's return on equity of -- beat BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF's return on equity of --.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has higher upside potential than BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF, analysts believe CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged is more attractive than BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.197% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF has a beta of 1.328, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.796%.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.65%. BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's net income of -- is lower than BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged is -- versus -- for BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Hedged to CAD Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's net margin of --. CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's return on equity of -- beat BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Hedged to CAD Idx ETF's return on equity of --.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Hedged to CAD Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has higher upside potential than BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Hedged to CAD Idx ETF, analysts believe CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged is more attractive than BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Hedged to CAD Idx ETF.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.197% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Hedged to CAD Idx ETF has a beta of 1.585, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.484%.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.65%. BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Hedged to CAD Idx ETF offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Hedged to CAD Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Hedged to CAD Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's net income of -- is lower than BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Hedged to CAD Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Hedged to CAD Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF Hedged is -- versus -- for BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Hedged to CAD Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.