Financhill
Sell
22

ERO.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$20.22
Seasonality move :
11.85%
Day range:
$20.11 - $20.72
52-week range:
$18.38 - $32.89
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
83.30x
P/S ratio:
3.28x
P/B ratio:
2.18x
Volume:
353.4K
Avg. volume:
369.8K
1-year change:
-7.52%
Market cap:
$2.1B
Revenue:
$577M
EPS (TTM):
$0.24

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ERO.TO
Ero Copper
$267.6M $0.88 68.9% 67.98% $32.04
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International
-- -- -- -- --
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals
$885.4M $0.39 8.01% 307.04% $16.41
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining
$1.8B $0.27 23.45% 311.31% $17.45
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources
$2.5B $0.38 -76.16% -58.96% $73.78
TKO.TO
Taseko Mines
$173.6M $0.05 13.04% -57.69% $4.41
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ERO.TO
Ero Copper
$20.28 $32.04 $2.1B 83.30x $0.00 0% 3.28x
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International
$0.0100 -- $2M -- $0.00 0% 2.74x
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals
$12.36 $16.41 $4.9B 40.72x $0.01 0.16% 1.64x
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining
$12.58 $17.45 $9.8B 25.60x $0.09 2.86% 1.73x
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources
$59.42 $73.78 $29.9B 65.30x $0.13 0.84% 1.47x
TKO.TO
Taseko Mines
$2.92 $4.41 $889M 19.55x $0.00 0% 1.44x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ERO.TO
Ero Copper
43.09% -0.382 23.36% 0.38x
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International
21.47% 0.903 5.8% 0.39x
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals
30.41% 0.119 29.76% 1.45x
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining
26.68% 0.458 19.72% 0.89x
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources
25.48% 1.257 22.78% 2.24x
TKO.TO
Taseko Mines
60.14% 0.045 70.55% 1.02x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ERO.TO
Ero Copper
$73.3M $46.2M 1.39% 2.36% 40.18% -$33.7M
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International
$50K -$390.8K -138.99% -167.71% 88.71% $38.2K
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals
$190.7M $143.1M 2.41% 3.68% 19.75% $64.8M
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining
$398.1M $351.1M 3.58% 4.37% 24.07% -$91.2M
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources
$478M $383M 1.26% 1.7% -19.91% $321M
TKO.TO
Taseko Mines
$30.8M $19M 4.08% 10.34% 14.71% $48.6M

Ero Copper vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ERO.TO or BEE.CX?

    Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a net margin of 32.73% compared to Ero Copper's net margin of 25.53%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 2.36% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International's return on equity of -167.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    43.02% $0.53 $1.7B
    BEE.CX
    Bee Vectoring Technologies International
    61.05% $0.00 $1.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About ERO.TO or BEE.CX?

    Ero Copper has a consensus price target of $32.04, signalling upside risk potential of 58%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ero Copper has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, analysts believe Ero Copper is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    6 3 0
    BEE.CX
    Bee Vectoring Technologies International
    0 0 0
  • Is ERO.TO or BEE.CX More Risky?

    Ero Copper has a beta of 1.806, which suggesting that the stock is 80.564% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ERO.TO or BEE.CX?

    Ero Copper has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ero Copper pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ERO.TO or BEE.CX?

    Ero Copper quarterly revenues are $170.3M, which are larger than Bee Vectoring Technologies International quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Ero Copper's net income of $55.7M is higher than Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net income of $20.9K. Notably, Ero Copper's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.30x while Bee Vectoring Technologies International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ero Copper is 3.28x versus 2.74x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    3.28x 83.30x $170.3M $55.7M
    BEE.CX
    Bee Vectoring Technologies International
    2.74x -- $81.9K $20.9K
  • Which has Higher Returns ERO.TO or HBM.TO?

    Hudbay Minerals has a net margin of 32.73% compared to Ero Copper's net margin of 10.24%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 2.36% beat Hudbay Minerals's return on equity of 3.68%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    43.02% $0.53 $1.7B
    HBM.TO
    Hudbay Minerals
    28.78% $0.18 $5.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About ERO.TO or HBM.TO?

    Ero Copper has a consensus price target of $32.04, signalling upside risk potential of 58%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals has an analysts' consensus of $16.41 which suggests that it could grow by 32.79%. Given that Ero Copper has higher upside potential than Hudbay Minerals, analysts believe Ero Copper is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    6 3 0
    HBM.TO
    Hudbay Minerals
    9 0 0
  • Is ERO.TO or HBM.TO More Risky?

    Ero Copper has a beta of 1.806, which suggesting that the stock is 80.564% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 1.857, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.744%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ERO.TO or HBM.TO?

    Ero Copper has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Ero Copper pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals pays out 6.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ERO.TO or HBM.TO?

    Ero Copper quarterly revenues are $170.3M, which are smaller than Hudbay Minerals quarterly revenues of $662.8M. Ero Copper's net income of $55.7M is lower than Hudbay Minerals's net income of $67.9M. Notably, Ero Copper's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.30x while Hudbay Minerals's PE ratio is 40.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ero Copper is 3.28x versus 1.64x for Hudbay Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    3.28x 83.30x $170.3M $55.7M
    HBM.TO
    Hudbay Minerals
    1.64x 40.72x $662.8M $67.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns ERO.TO or LUN.TO?

    Lundin Mining has a net margin of 32.73% compared to Ero Copper's net margin of 9.43%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 2.36% beat Lundin Mining's return on equity of 4.37%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    43.02% $0.53 $1.7B
    LUN.TO
    Lundin Mining
    27.2% $0.18 $10.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About ERO.TO or LUN.TO?

    Ero Copper has a consensus price target of $32.04, signalling upside risk potential of 58%. On the other hand Lundin Mining has an analysts' consensus of $17.45 which suggests that it could grow by 38.7%. Given that Ero Copper has higher upside potential than Lundin Mining, analysts believe Ero Copper is more attractive than Lundin Mining.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    6 3 0
    LUN.TO
    Lundin Mining
    7 7 0
  • Is ERO.TO or LUN.TO More Risky?

    Ero Copper has a beta of 1.806, which suggesting that the stock is 80.564% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining has a beta of 1.649, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.91%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ERO.TO or LUN.TO?

    Ero Copper has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Ero Copper pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining pays out 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ERO.TO or LUN.TO?

    Ero Copper quarterly revenues are $170.3M, which are smaller than Lundin Mining quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Ero Copper's net income of $55.7M is lower than Lundin Mining's net income of $138M. Notably, Ero Copper's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.30x while Lundin Mining's PE ratio is 25.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ero Copper is 3.28x versus 1.73x for Lundin Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    3.28x 83.30x $170.3M $55.7M
    LUN.TO
    Lundin Mining
    1.73x 25.60x $1.5B $138M
  • Which has Higher Returns ERO.TO or TECK.B.TO?

    Teck Resources has a net margin of 32.73% compared to Ero Copper's net margin of -24.46%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 2.36% beat Teck Resources's return on equity of 1.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    43.02% $0.53 $1.7B
    TECK.B.TO
    Teck Resources
    16.73% -$1.35 $34.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About ERO.TO or TECK.B.TO?

    Ero Copper has a consensus price target of $32.04, signalling upside risk potential of 58%. On the other hand Teck Resources has an analysts' consensus of $73.78 which suggests that it could grow by 24.17%. Given that Ero Copper has higher upside potential than Teck Resources, analysts believe Ero Copper is more attractive than Teck Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    6 3 0
    TECK.B.TO
    Teck Resources
    10 5 1
  • Is ERO.TO or TECK.B.TO More Risky?

    Ero Copper has a beta of 1.806, which suggesting that the stock is 80.564% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teck Resources has a beta of 1.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.314%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ERO.TO or TECK.B.TO?

    Ero Copper has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teck Resources offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Ero Copper pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ERO.TO or TECK.B.TO?

    Ero Copper quarterly revenues are $170.3M, which are smaller than Teck Resources quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Ero Copper's net income of $55.7M is higher than Teck Resources's net income of -$699M. Notably, Ero Copper's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.30x while Teck Resources's PE ratio is 65.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ero Copper is 3.28x versus 1.47x for Teck Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    3.28x 83.30x $170.3M $55.7M
    TECK.B.TO
    Teck Resources
    1.47x 65.30x $2.9B -$699M
  • Which has Higher Returns ERO.TO or TKO.TO?

    Taseko Mines has a net margin of 32.73% compared to Ero Copper's net margin of -0.12%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 2.36% beat Taseko Mines's return on equity of 10.34%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    43.02% $0.53 $1.7B
    TKO.TO
    Taseko Mines
    19.78% -$0.00 $1.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About ERO.TO or TKO.TO?

    Ero Copper has a consensus price target of $32.04, signalling upside risk potential of 58%. On the other hand Taseko Mines has an analysts' consensus of $4.41 which suggests that it could grow by 50.93%. Given that Ero Copper has higher upside potential than Taseko Mines, analysts believe Ero Copper is more attractive than Taseko Mines.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    6 3 0
    TKO.TO
    Taseko Mines
    4 0 0
  • Is ERO.TO or TKO.TO More Risky?

    Ero Copper has a beta of 1.806, which suggesting that the stock is 80.564% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taseko Mines has a beta of 1.877, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.709%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ERO.TO or TKO.TO?

    Ero Copper has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Taseko Mines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ero Copper pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Taseko Mines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ERO.TO or TKO.TO?

    Ero Copper quarterly revenues are $170.3M, which are larger than Taseko Mines quarterly revenues of $155.6M. Ero Copper's net income of $55.7M is higher than Taseko Mines's net income of -$180K. Notably, Ero Copper's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.30x while Taseko Mines's PE ratio is 19.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ero Copper is 3.28x versus 1.44x for Taseko Mines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ERO.TO
    Ero Copper
    3.28x 83.30x $170.3M $55.7M
    TKO.TO
    Taseko Mines
    1.44x 19.55x $155.6M -$180K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?

With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…

Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?

If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…

3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks

Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…

Stock Ideas

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x

Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8

Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.

Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8

UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.

Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8

Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock