DR.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 15.66% compared to Medical Facilities Corp.'s net margin of -1.17%. Medical Facilities Corp.'s return on equity of 48.45% beat Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.55%.

Medical Facilities Corp. has a consensus price target of $16.40, signalling upside risk potential of 5.96%. On the other hand Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $11.44 which suggests that it could grow by 0.55%. Given that Medical Facilities Corp. has higher upside potential than Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Medical Facilities Corp. is more attractive than Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd..

Medical Facilities Corp. has a beta of 0.241, which suggesting that the stock is 75.856% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Medical Facilities Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Medical Facilities Corp. pays 5.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Medical Facilities Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Medical Facilities Corp. quarterly revenues are $113.7M, which are smaller than Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $420.1M. Medical Facilities Corp.'s net income of $17.8M is higher than Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$4.9M. Notably, Medical Facilities Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.19x while Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Medical Facilities Corp. is 0.96x versus 1.30x for Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Extendicare, Inc. has a net margin of 15.66% compared to Medical Facilities Corp.'s net margin of 5.48%. Medical Facilities Corp.'s return on equity of 48.45% beat Extendicare, Inc.'s return on equity of 67.31%.

Medical Facilities Corp. has a consensus price target of $16.40, signalling upside risk potential of 5.96%. On the other hand Extendicare, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.96 which suggests that it could grow by 7.22%. Given that Extendicare, Inc. has higher upside potential than Medical Facilities Corp., analysts believe Extendicare, Inc. is more attractive than Medical Facilities Corp..

Medical Facilities Corp. has a beta of 0.241, which suggesting that the stock is 75.856% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Extendicare, Inc. has a beta of 1.133, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.26%.

Medical Facilities Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Extendicare, Inc. offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Medical Facilities Corp. pays 5.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Extendicare, Inc. pays out 53.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Medical Facilities Corp. quarterly revenues are $113.7M, which are smaller than Extendicare, Inc. quarterly revenues of $440.3M. Medical Facilities Corp.'s net income of $17.8M is lower than Extendicare, Inc.'s net income of $24.1M. Notably, Medical Facilities Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.19x while Extendicare, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Medical Facilities Corp. is 0.96x versus 1.23x for Extendicare, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jack Nathan Medical Corp. has a net margin of 15.66% compared to Medical Facilities Corp.'s net margin of -109.67%. Medical Facilities Corp.'s return on equity of 48.45% beat Jack Nathan Medical Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Medical Facilities Corp. has a consensus price target of $16.40, signalling upside risk potential of 5.96%. On the other hand Jack Nathan Medical Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Medical Facilities Corp. has higher upside potential than Jack Nathan Medical Corp., analysts believe Medical Facilities Corp. is more attractive than Jack Nathan Medical Corp..

Medical Facilities Corp. has a beta of 0.241, which suggesting that the stock is 75.856% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jack Nathan Medical Corp. has a beta of -0.407, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 140.741%.

Medical Facilities Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Jack Nathan Medical Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Medical Facilities Corp. pays 5.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Jack Nathan Medical Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Medical Facilities Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Medical Facilities Corp. quarterly revenues are $113.7M, which are larger than Jack Nathan Medical Corp. quarterly revenues of $227.5K. Medical Facilities Corp.'s net income of $17.8M is higher than Jack Nathan Medical Corp.'s net income of -$249.5K. Notably, Medical Facilities Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.19x while Jack Nathan Medical Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Medical Facilities Corp. is 0.96x versus 0.11x for Jack Nathan Medical Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sienna Senior Living, Inc. has a net margin of 15.66% compared to Medical Facilities Corp.'s net margin of 4.1%. Medical Facilities Corp.'s return on equity of 48.45% beat Sienna Senior Living, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.98%.

Medical Facilities Corp. has a consensus price target of $16.40, signalling upside risk potential of 5.96%. On the other hand Sienna Senior Living, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.67 which suggests that it could grow by 7.48%. Given that Sienna Senior Living, Inc. has higher upside potential than Medical Facilities Corp., analysts believe Sienna Senior Living, Inc. is more attractive than Medical Facilities Corp..

Medical Facilities Corp. has a beta of 0.241, which suggesting that the stock is 75.856% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sienna Senior Living, Inc. has a beta of 1.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.621%.

Medical Facilities Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Sienna Senior Living, Inc. offers a yield of 4.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Medical Facilities Corp. pays 5.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Sienna Senior Living, Inc. pays out 185.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Medical Facilities Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sienna Senior Living, Inc.'s is not.

Medical Facilities Corp. quarterly revenues are $113.7M, which are smaller than Sienna Senior Living, Inc. quarterly revenues of $252.7M. Medical Facilities Corp.'s net income of $17.8M is higher than Sienna Senior Living, Inc.'s net income of $10.4M. Notably, Medical Facilities Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.19x while Sienna Senior Living, Inc.'s PE ratio is 47.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Medical Facilities Corp. is 0.96x versus 1.93x for Sienna Senior Living, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.