Financhill
Sell
40

CRED.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$20.25
Seasonality move :
0.01%
Day range:
$20.26 - $20.26
52-week range:
$19.71 - $20.39
Dividend yield:
2.96%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
141
1-year change:
-0.74%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CRED.TO
CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
-- -- -- -- --
CMDO.TO
CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr
-- -- -- -- --
CMEY.TO
CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD
-- -- -- -- --
GSIF.NO
Guardian Strategic Income ETF
-- -- -- -- --
NACO.NO
Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF
-- -- -- -- --
RATE.TO
Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CRED.TO
CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
$20.25 -- -- -- $0.05 2.96% --
CMDO.TO
CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr
$20.04 -- -- -- $0.06 3.83% --
CMEY.TO
CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD
$19.72 -- -- -- $0.07 4.38% --
GSIF.NO
Guardian Strategic Income ETF
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
NACO.NO
Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
RATE.TO
Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF
$21.09 -- -- -- $0.08 4.61% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CRED.TO
CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
-- 0.092 -- --
CMDO.TO
CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr
-- 0.199 -- --
CMEY.TO
CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD
-- 0.090 -- --
GSIF.NO
Guardian Strategic Income ETF
-- 0.000 -- --
NACO.NO
Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF
-- 0.000 -- --
RATE.TO
Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF
-- 0.025 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CRED.TO
CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
CMDO.TO
CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr
-- -- -- -- -- --
CMEY.TO
CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD
-- -- -- -- -- --
GSIF.NO
Guardian Strategic Income ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
NACO.NO
Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
RATE.TO
Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --

CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CRED.TO or CMDO.TO?

    CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr has a net margin of -- compared to CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's net margin of --. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    -- -- --
    CMDO.TO
    CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CRED.TO or CMDO.TO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has higher upside potential than CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr, analysts believe CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF is more attractive than CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    0 0 0
    CMDO.TO
    CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr
    0 0 0
  • Is CRED.TO or CMDO.TO More Risky?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a beta of 0.082, which suggesting that the stock is 91.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRED.TO or CMDO.TO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr offers a yield of 3.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CRED.TO or CMDO.TO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr quarterly revenues of --. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr's net income of --. Notably, CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF is -- versus -- for CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    -- -- -- --
    CMDO.TO
    CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities ETF C$ Sr
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CRED.TO or CMEY.TO?

    CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD has a net margin of -- compared to CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's net margin of --. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    -- -- --
    CMEY.TO
    CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CRED.TO or CMEY.TO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has higher upside potential than CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD, analysts believe CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF is more attractive than CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    0 0 0
    CMEY.TO
    CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD
    0 0 0
  • Is CRED.TO or CMEY.TO More Risky?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a beta of 0.082, which suggesting that the stock is 91.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD has a beta of 0.156, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.415%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRED.TO or CMEY.TO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CRED.TO or CMEY.TO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD quarterly revenues of --. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD's net income of --. Notably, CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF is -- versus -- for CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    -- -- -- --
    CMEY.TO
    CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield ETF CAD
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CRED.TO or GSIF.NO?

    Guardian Strategic Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's net margin of --. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat Guardian Strategic Income ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    -- -- --
    GSIF.NO
    Guardian Strategic Income ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CRED.TO or GSIF.NO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Guardian Strategic Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has higher upside potential than Guardian Strategic Income ETF, analysts believe CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF is more attractive than Guardian Strategic Income ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    0 0 0
    GSIF.NO
    Guardian Strategic Income ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is CRED.TO or GSIF.NO More Risky?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a beta of 0.082, which suggesting that the stock is 91.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guardian Strategic Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRED.TO or GSIF.NO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Guardian Strategic Income ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guardian Strategic Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CRED.TO or GSIF.NO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Guardian Strategic Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than Guardian Strategic Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Guardian Strategic Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF is -- versus -- for Guardian Strategic Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    -- -- -- --
    GSIF.NO
    Guardian Strategic Income ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CRED.TO or NACO.NO?

    Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's net margin of --. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    -- -- --
    NACO.NO
    Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CRED.TO or NACO.NO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has higher upside potential than Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF, analysts believe CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF is more attractive than Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    0 0 0
    NACO.NO
    Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is CRED.TO or NACO.NO More Risky?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a beta of 0.082, which suggesting that the stock is 91.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRED.TO or NACO.NO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CRED.TO or NACO.NO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF is -- versus -- for Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    -- -- -- --
    NACO.NO
    Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opps ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CRED.TO or RATE.TO?

    Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's net margin of --. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    -- -- --
    RATE.TO
    Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CRED.TO or RATE.TO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has higher upside potential than Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF, analysts believe CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF is more attractive than Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    0 0 0
    RATE.TO
    Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is CRED.TO or RATE.TO More Risky?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a beta of 0.082, which suggesting that the stock is 91.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRED.TO or RATE.TO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF offers a yield of 4.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CRED.TO or RATE.TO?

    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF is -- versus -- for Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CRED.TO
    CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund ETF
    -- -- -- --
    RATE.TO
    Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative series ETF
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?

EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…

What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?

As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…

Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?

Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…

Stock Ideas

Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Alerts

Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 18.2% over the past day.

Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 16

Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 13.35% over the past day.

Sell
38
HUT alert for Dec 16

Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 3.92% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock