Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
46
CHNA.B.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.35
Seasonality move
:
2.93%
Day range:
$28.49 - $28.49
52-week range:
$21.15 - $30.20
Dividend yield:
2.37%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
13
Avg. volume:
996
1-year change:
20.42%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHNA.B.TO
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QCH.NO
Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XML.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMM.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZCH.TO
BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHNA.B.TO
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged
|
$27.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 2.37% | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
$46.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.7% | -- |
|
QCH.NO
Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
XML.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd)
|
$31.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.47 | 2.43% | -- |
|
XMM.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF
|
$31.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 2.92% | -- |
|
ZCH.TO
BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF
|
$20.50 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 1.68% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHNA.B.TO
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged
|
-- | 0.571 | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.895 | -- | -- |
|
QCH.NO
Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
XML.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd)
|
-- | 0.137 | -- | -- |
|
XMM.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.158 | -- | -- |
|
ZCH.TO
BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF
|
-- | 0.301 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHNA.B.TO
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QCH.NO
Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XML.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMM.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZCH.TO
BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CHNA.B.TO or DISC.TO?
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's net margin of --. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's return on equity of -- beat BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CHNA.B.TO or DISC.TO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has higher upside potential than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF, analysts believe CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged is more attractive than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged0 0 0 DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is CHNA.B.TO or DISC.TO More Risky?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a beta of 0.211, which suggesting that the stock is 78.889% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.49%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNA.B.TO or DISC.TO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNA.B.TO or DISC.TO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's net income of -- is lower than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged is -- versus -- for BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- -- DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHNA.B.TO or QCH.NO?
Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's net margin of --. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- QCH.NOMackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CHNA.B.TO or QCH.NO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has higher upside potential than Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF, analysts believe CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged is more attractive than Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged0 0 0 QCH.NOMackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF0 0 0 -
Is CHNA.B.TO or QCH.NO More Risky?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a beta of 0.211, which suggesting that the stock is 78.889% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNA.B.TO or QCH.NO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNA.B.TO or QCH.NO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged is -- versus -- for Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- -- QCH.NOMackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHNA.B.TO or XML.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd) has a net margin of -- compared to CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's net margin of --. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- XML.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CHNA.B.TO or XML.TO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd), analysts believe CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged is more attractive than iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged0 0 0 XML.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd)0 0 0 -
Is CHNA.B.TO or XML.TO More Risky?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a beta of 0.211, which suggesting that the stock is 78.889% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd) has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.556%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNA.B.TO or XML.TO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd) offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNA.B.TO or XML.TO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd) quarterly revenues of --. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd)'s net income of --. Notably, CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- -- XML.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Idx ETF (CAD-Hgd)-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHNA.B.TO or XMM.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's net margin of --. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- XMM.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CHNA.B.TO or XMM.TO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF, analysts believe CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged is more attractive than iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged0 0 0 XMM.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is CHNA.B.TO or XMM.TO More Risky?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a beta of 0.211, which suggesting that the stock is 78.889% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF has a beta of 0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.09%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNA.B.TO or XMM.TO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNA.B.TO or XMM.TO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- -- XMM.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHNA.B.TO or ZCH.TO?
BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's net margin of --. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's return on equity of -- beat BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- ZCH.TOBMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CHNA.B.TO or ZCH.TO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has higher upside potential than BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF, analysts believe CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged is more attractive than BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged0 0 0 ZCH.TOBMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CHNA.B.TO or ZCH.TO More Risky?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a beta of 0.211, which suggesting that the stock is 78.889% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF has a beta of 0.273, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.661%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNA.B.TO or ZCH.TO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNA.B.TO or ZCH.TO?
CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's net income of -- is lower than BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged is -- versus -- for BMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHNA.B.TOCI ICBCUBS S&P China 500 Index ETF Non-Hedged-- -- -- -- ZCH.TOBMO MSCI China Selection Equity Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 17
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 18.2% over the past day.
Sell
45
ZBIO alert for Dec 17
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 13.35% over the past day.
Buy
75
AFRM alert for Dec 17
Affirm Holdings, Inc. [AFRM] is up 11.77% over the past day.
