Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Buy
76
CGXF.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$20.97
Seasonality move
:
1.28%
Day range:
$20.82 - $21.00
52-week range:
$10.02 - $21.00
Dividend yield:
5.51%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
36.8K
Avg. volume:
13.2K
1-year change:
101.25%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGXF.TO
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMAX.TO
Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMA.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGXF.TO
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF
|
$20.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 5.51% | -- |
|
AMAX.TO
Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer
|
$36.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 6.5% | -- |
|
GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF
|
$57.21 | -- | -- | -- | $0.35 | 5.65% | -- |
|
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF
|
$29.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 0.97% | -- |
|
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
|
$52.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0.46% | -- |
|
XMA.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF
|
$42.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.36% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGXF.TO
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF
|
-- | 1.532 | -- | -- |
|
AMAX.TO
Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer
|
-- | 1.730 | -- | -- |
|
GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF
|
-- | 1.907 | -- | -- |
|
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF
|
-- | 1.814 | -- | -- |
|
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
|
-- | 1.918 | -- | -- |
|
XMA.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF
|
-- | 1.866 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGXF.TO
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMAX.TO
Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMA.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CGXF.TO or AMAX.TO?
Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer has a net margin of -- compared to CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's net margin of --. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's return on equity of -- beat Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF-- -- -- AMAX.TOHamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGXF.TO or AMAX.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has higher upside potential than Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer, analysts believe CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF is more attractive than Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF0 0 0 AMAX.TOHamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer0 0 0 -
Is CGXF.TO or AMAX.TO More Risky?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.810, which suggesting that the stock is 18.974% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGXF.TO or AMAX.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.51%. Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer offers a yield of 6.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGXF.TO or AMAX.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer quarterly revenues of --. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's net income of -- is lower than Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer's net income of --. Notably, CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF is -- versus -- for Hamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -- AMAX.TOHamilton Gold Producer Yield Maximizer-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGXF.TO or GLCC.TO?
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's net margin of --. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF-- -- -- GLCC.TOGlobal X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGXF.TO or GLCC.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF, analysts believe CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF is more attractive than Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF0 0 0 GLCC.TOGlobal X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGXF.TO or GLCC.TO More Risky?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.810, which suggesting that the stock is 18.974% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.066%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGXF.TO or GLCC.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.51%. Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF offers a yield of 5.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGXF.TO or GLCC.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -- GLCC.TOGlobal X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGXF.TO or XBM.TO?
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's net margin of --. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF-- -- -- XBM.TOiShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGXF.TO or XBM.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has higher upside potential than iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF, analysts believe CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF is more attractive than iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF0 0 0 XBM.TOiShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGXF.TO or XBM.TO More Risky?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.810, which suggesting that the stock is 18.974% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.006%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGXF.TO or XBM.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.51%. iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGXF.TO or XBM.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF is -- versus -- for iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -- XBM.TOiShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGXF.TO or XGD.TO?
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's net margin of --. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF-- -- -- XGD.TOiShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGXF.TO or XGD.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has higher upside potential than iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF, analysts believe CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF is more attractive than iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF0 0 0 XGD.TOiShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGXF.TO or XGD.TO More Risky?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.810, which suggesting that the stock is 18.974% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF has a beta of 0.949, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.13%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGXF.TO or XGD.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.51%. iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGXF.TO or XGD.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF is -- versus -- for iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -- XGD.TOiShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGXF.TO or XMA.TO?
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's net margin of --. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF-- -- -- XMA.TOiShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGXF.TO or XMA.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has higher upside potential than iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF, analysts believe CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF is more attractive than iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF0 0 0 XMA.TOiShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGXF.TO or XMA.TO More Risky?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.810, which suggesting that the stock is 18.974% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.538%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGXF.TO or XMA.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.51%. iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF offers a yield of 0.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGXF.TO or XMA.TO?
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF is -- versus -- for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGXF.TOCI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -- XMA.TOiShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
