3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Buy
78
CGRN.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$22.31
Seasonality move
:
0.63%
Day range:
$22.31 - $22.31
52-week range:
$19.13 - $22.31
Dividend yield:
2.24%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
13.19%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGRN.TO
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CINF.TO
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DXN.TO
Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCII.TO
Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QINF.TO
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGRN.TO
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series
|
$22.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 2.24% | -- |
|
CINF.TO
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF
|
$27.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 3% | -- |
|
DXN.TO
Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF
|
$21.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 3.15% | -- |
|
FCII.TO
Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr
|
$21.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 4.15% | -- |
|
QINF.TO
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF
|
$140.57 | -- | -- | -- | $1.01 | 2.69% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGRN.TO
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series
|
-- | 0.444 | -- | -- |
|
CINF.TO
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF
|
-- | 0.849 | -- | -- |
|
DXN.TO
Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | 0.802 | -- | -- |
|
FCII.TO
Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr
|
-- | 0.727 | -- | -- |
|
QINF.TO
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF
|
-- | 0.948 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGRN.TO
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CINF.TO
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DXN.TO
Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCII.TO
Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QINF.TO
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CGRN.TO or CINF.TO?
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's net margin of --. CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's return on equity of -- beat CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGRN.TOCI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series-- -- -- CINF.TOCI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGRN.TO or CINF.TO?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has higher upside potential than CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF, analysts believe CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series is more attractive than CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGRN.TOCI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series0 0 0 CINF.TOCI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGRN.TO or CINF.TO More Risky?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGRN.TO or CINF.TO?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGRN.TO or CINF.TO?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's net income of -- is lower than CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series is -- versus -- for CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGRN.TOCI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series-- -- -- -- CINF.TOCI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGRN.TO or DXN.TO?
Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's net margin of --. CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's return on equity of -- beat Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGRN.TOCI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series-- -- -- DXN.TODynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGRN.TO or DXN.TO?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has higher upside potential than Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF, analysts believe CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series is more attractive than Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGRN.TOCI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series0 0 0 DXN.TODynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGRN.TO or DXN.TO More Risky?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGRN.TO or DXN.TO?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF offers a yield of 3.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGRN.TO or DXN.TO?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's net income of -- is lower than Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series is -- versus -- for Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGRN.TOCI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series-- -- -- -- DXN.TODynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGRN.TO or FCII.TO?
Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's net margin of --. CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's return on equity of -- beat Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGRN.TOCI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series-- -- -- FCII.TOFranklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGRN.TO or FCII.TO?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has higher upside potential than Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr, analysts believe CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series is more attractive than Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGRN.TOCI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series0 0 0 FCII.TOFranklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr0 0 0 -
Is CGRN.TO or FCII.TO More Risky?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGRN.TO or FCII.TO?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGRN.TO or FCII.TO?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's net income of -- is lower than Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series is -- versus -- for Franklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGRN.TOCI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series-- -- -- -- FCII.TOFranklin ClearBridge Sust Gl InfraActv ETF Sr-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGRN.TO or QINF.TO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's net margin of --. CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGRN.TOCI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series-- -- -- QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGRN.TO or QINF.TO?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF, analysts believe CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series is more attractive than Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGRN.TOCI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series0 0 0 QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGRN.TO or QINF.TO More Risky?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGRN.TO or QINF.TO?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGRN.TO or QINF.TO?
CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGRN.TOCI Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF C$ Series-- -- -- -- QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will American Tower Stock Recover?
The performance of the real estate investment trust, or REIT,…
Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?
Booking Holdings, the travel and technology company that owns brands…
Stock Ideas
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 125x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
50
NARI alert for Jan 7
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 30.64% over the past day.
Buy
70
PDEX alert for Jan 7
Pro-Dex [PDEX] is up 22.41% over the past day.
Buy
52
ALCO alert for Jan 7
Alico [ALCO] is up 18.99% over the past day.
