Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Buy
57
CGDV.B.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$22.85
Seasonality move
:
7.41%
Day range:
$22.85 - $22.85
52-week range:
$20.10 - $23.73
Dividend yield:
2.32%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
13.68%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGDV.B.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MTAV.TO
Global X Metaverse Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MWMN.NO
Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZGRN.TO
BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGDV.B.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged
|
$22.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 2.32% | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
$31.81 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 1.63% | -- |
|
MTAV.TO
Global X Metaverse Index ETF
|
$29.78 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF
|
$23.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 0.69% | -- |
|
MWMN.NO
Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ZGRN.TO
BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF
|
$40.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 1.28% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGDV.B.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged
|
-- | 0.246 | -- | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
-- | 0.512 | -- | -- |
|
MTAV.TO
Global X Metaverse Index ETF
|
-- | 0.164 | -- | -- |
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MWMN.NO
Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
ZGRN.TO
BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.282 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGDV.B.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MTAV.TO
Global X Metaverse Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MWMN.NO
Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZGRN.TO
BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.B.TO or DRFG.TO?
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's return on equity of -- beat Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged-- -- -- DRFG.TODesjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.B.TO or DRFG.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has higher upside potential than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF, analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged is more attractive than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged0 0 0 DRFG.TODesjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.B.TO or DRFG.TO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF has a beta of 0.655, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.465%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.B.TO or DRFG.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.B.TO or DRFG.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's net income of -- is lower than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged is -- versus -- for Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged-- -- -- -- DRFG.TODesjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.B.TO or MTAV.TO?
Global X Metaverse Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's return on equity of -- beat Global X Metaverse Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged-- -- -- MTAV.TOGlobal X Metaverse Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.B.TO or MTAV.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Metaverse Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has higher upside potential than Global X Metaverse Index ETF, analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged is more attractive than Global X Metaverse Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged0 0 0 MTAV.TOGlobal X Metaverse Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.B.TO or MTAV.TO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Metaverse Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.B.TO or MTAV.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. Global X Metaverse Index ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Metaverse Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.B.TO or MTAV.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Metaverse Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's net income of -- is lower than Global X Metaverse Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Metaverse Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged is -- versus -- for Global X Metaverse Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged-- -- -- -- MTAV.TOGlobal X Metaverse Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.B.TO or MWLV.TO?
Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged-- -- -- MWLV.TOMackenzie World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.B.TO or MWLV.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has higher upside potential than Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF, analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged is more attractive than Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged0 0 0 MWLV.TOMackenzie World Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.B.TO or MWLV.TO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.B.TO or MWLV.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.B.TO or MWLV.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged is -- versus -- for Mackenzie World Low Volatility ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged-- -- -- -- MWLV.TOMackenzie World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.B.TO or MWMN.NO?
Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged-- -- -- MWMN.NOMackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.B.TO or MWMN.NO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF, analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged is more attractive than Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged0 0 0 MWMN.NOMackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.B.TO or MWMN.NO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.B.TO or MWMN.NO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.B.TO or MWMN.NO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged-- -- -- -- MWMN.NOMackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.B.TO or ZGRN.TO?
BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's return on equity of -- beat BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged-- -- -- ZGRN.TOBMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.B.TO or ZGRN.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has higher upside potential than BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF, analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged is more attractive than BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged0 0 0 ZGRN.TOBMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.B.TO or ZGRN.TO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.B.TO or ZGRN.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.B.TO or ZGRN.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's net income of -- is lower than BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged is -- versus -- for BMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.B.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Volt Index ETF Unhedged-- -- -- -- ZGRN.TOBMO MSCI ACWI Paris Aligned Climate Equity Idx ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.
