Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
59
CCOM.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$19.97
Seasonality move
:
-0.34%
Day range:
$19.94 - $20.00
52-week range:
$17.50 - $20.43
Dividend yield:
5.85%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
638
Avg. volume:
4.7K
1-year change:
5.66%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCOM.TO
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EBIT.TO
Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBIT.NO
iShares Bitcoin ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QBTL.TO
AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOLQ.TO
3iQ Solana Staking ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCOM.TO
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units
|
$19.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 5.85% | -- |
|
EBIT.TO
Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged
|
$41.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
IBIT.NO
iShares Bitcoin ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
QBTL.TO
AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF
|
$15.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SOLQ.TO
3iQ Solana Staking ETF
|
$13.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCOM.TO
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units
|
-- | 0.078 | -- | -- |
|
EBIT.TO
Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged
|
-- | 0.799 | -- | -- |
|
IBIT.NO
iShares Bitcoin ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
QBTL.TO
AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF
|
-- | -0.784 | -- | -- |
|
SOLQ.TO
3iQ Solana Staking ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCOM.TO
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EBIT.TO
Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBIT.NO
iShares Bitcoin ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QBTL.TO
AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOLQ.TO
3iQ Solana Staking ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CCOM.TO or EBIT.TO?
Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged has a net margin of -- compared to CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's net margin of --. CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's return on equity of -- beat Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCOM.TOCI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units-- -- -- EBIT.TOEvolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CCOM.TO or EBIT.TO?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has higher upside potential than Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged, analysts believe CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units is more attractive than Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCOM.TOCI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units0 0 0 EBIT.TOEvolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged0 0 0 -
Is CCOM.TO or EBIT.TO More Risky?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCOM.TO or EBIT.TO?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.85%. Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCOM.TO or EBIT.TO?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged quarterly revenues of --. CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's net income of -- is lower than Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged's net income of --. Notably, CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units is -- versus -- for Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCOM.TOCI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units-- -- -- -- EBIT.TOEvolve Bitcoin ETF CAD - Unhedged-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CCOM.TO or IBIT.NO?
iShares Bitcoin ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's net margin of --. CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's return on equity of -- beat iShares Bitcoin ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCOM.TOCI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units-- -- -- IBIT.NOiShares Bitcoin ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CCOM.TO or IBIT.NO?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Bitcoin ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has higher upside potential than iShares Bitcoin ETF, analysts believe CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units is more attractive than iShares Bitcoin ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCOM.TOCI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units0 0 0 IBIT.NOiShares Bitcoin ETF0 0 0 -
Is CCOM.TO or IBIT.NO More Risky?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Bitcoin ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCOM.TO or IBIT.NO?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.85%. iShares Bitcoin ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Bitcoin ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCOM.TO or IBIT.NO?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Bitcoin ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's net income of -- is lower than iShares Bitcoin ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Bitcoin ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units is -- versus -- for iShares Bitcoin ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCOM.TOCI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units-- -- -- -- IBIT.NOiShares Bitcoin ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CCOM.TO or QBTL.TO?
AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's net margin of --. CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's return on equity of -- beat AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCOM.TOCI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units-- -- -- QBTL.TOAGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CCOM.TO or QBTL.TO?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has higher upside potential than AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF, analysts believe CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units is more attractive than AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCOM.TOCI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units0 0 0 QBTL.TOAGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF0 0 0 -
Is CCOM.TO or QBTL.TO More Risky?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF has a beta of -0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.971%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCOM.TO or QBTL.TO?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.85%. AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCOM.TO or QBTL.TO?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's net income of -- is lower than AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units is -- versus -- for AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCOM.TOCI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units-- -- -- -- QBTL.TOAGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta CAD-Hedged ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CCOM.TO or SOLQ.TO?
3iQ Solana Staking ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's net margin of --. CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's return on equity of -- beat 3iQ Solana Staking ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCOM.TOCI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units-- -- -- SOLQ.TO3iQ Solana Staking ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CCOM.TO or SOLQ.TO?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 3iQ Solana Staking ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has higher upside potential than 3iQ Solana Staking ETF, analysts believe CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units is more attractive than 3iQ Solana Staking ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCOM.TOCI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units0 0 0 SOLQ.TO3iQ Solana Staking ETF0 0 0 -
Is CCOM.TO or SOLQ.TO More Risky?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 3iQ Solana Staking ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCOM.TO or SOLQ.TO?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.85%. 3iQ Solana Staking ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 3iQ Solana Staking ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCOM.TO or SOLQ.TO?
CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than 3iQ Solana Staking ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's net income of -- is lower than 3iQ Solana Staking ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 3iQ Solana Staking ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units is -- versus -- for 3iQ Solana Staking ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCOM.TOCI Auspice Broad Commodity ETF Hedged Com Units-- -- -- -- SOLQ.TO3iQ Solana Staking ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 21.85% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 16
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is down 19.73% over the past day.
Sell
38
HUT alert for Dec 16
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is down 14.21% over the past day.
