BDT.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AtkinsRéalis Group, Inc. has a net margin of 3.33% compared to Bird Construction, Inc.'s net margin of 5.38%. Bird Construction, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.71% beat AtkinsRéalis Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 58.36%.

Bird Construction, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.63, signalling upside risk potential of 15.51%. On the other hand AtkinsRéalis Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $116.14 which suggests that it could grow by 28.32%. Given that AtkinsRéalis Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bird Construction, Inc., analysts believe AtkinsRéalis Group, Inc. is more attractive than Bird Construction, Inc..

Bird Construction, Inc. has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AtkinsRéalis Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.39%.

Bird Construction, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. AtkinsRéalis Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Bird Construction, Inc. pays 31.87% of its earnings as a dividend. AtkinsRéalis Group, Inc. pays out 4.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bird Construction, Inc. quarterly revenues are $951.4M, which are smaller than AtkinsRéalis Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Bird Construction, Inc.'s net income of $31.7M is lower than AtkinsRéalis Group, Inc.'s net income of $150.5M. Notably, Bird Construction, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.18x while AtkinsRéalis Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bird Construction, Inc. is 0.47x versus 1.48x for AtkinsRéalis Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. has a net margin of 3.33% compared to Bird Construction, Inc.'s net margin of 12.23%. Bird Construction, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.71% beat Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.85%.

Bird Construction, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.63, signalling upside risk potential of 15.51%. On the other hand Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $80.06 which suggests that it could grow by 7.06%. Given that Bird Construction, Inc. has higher upside potential than Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd., analysts believe Bird Construction, Inc. is more attractive than Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd..

Bird Construction, Inc. has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. has a beta of 0.892, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.844%.

Bird Construction, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Bird Construction, Inc. pays 31.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. pays out 37.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bird Construction, Inc. quarterly revenues are $951.4M, which are larger than Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. quarterly revenues of $326.9M. Bird Construction, Inc.'s net income of $31.7M is lower than Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.'s net income of $40M. Notably, Bird Construction, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.18x while Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.'s PE ratio is 29.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bird Construction, Inc. is 0.47x versus 2.26x for Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magellan Aerospace Corp. has a net margin of 3.33% compared to Bird Construction, Inc.'s net margin of 4.96%. Bird Construction, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.71% beat Magellan Aerospace Corp.'s return on equity of 5.56%.

Bird Construction, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.63, signalling upside risk potential of 15.51%. On the other hand Magellan Aerospace Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $20.15 which suggests that it could grow by 10.11%. Given that Bird Construction, Inc. has higher upside potential than Magellan Aerospace Corp., analysts believe Bird Construction, Inc. is more attractive than Magellan Aerospace Corp..

Bird Construction, Inc. has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magellan Aerospace Corp. has a beta of 0.009, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.124%.

Bird Construction, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Magellan Aerospace Corp. offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Bird Construction, Inc. pays 31.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Magellan Aerospace Corp. pays out 16.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bird Construction, Inc. quarterly revenues are $951.4M, which are larger than Magellan Aerospace Corp. quarterly revenues of $255.7M. Bird Construction, Inc.'s net income of $31.7M is higher than Magellan Aerospace Corp.'s net income of $12.7M. Notably, Bird Construction, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.18x while Magellan Aerospace Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bird Construction, Inc. is 0.47x versus 1.04x for Magellan Aerospace Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Savaria Corp. has a net margin of 3.33% compared to Bird Construction, Inc.'s net margin of 8.66%. Bird Construction, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.71% beat Savaria Corp.'s return on equity of 10.33%.

Bird Construction, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.63, signalling upside risk potential of 15.51%. On the other hand Savaria Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $27.38 which suggests that it could grow by 18.35%. Given that Savaria Corp. has higher upside potential than Bird Construction, Inc., analysts believe Savaria Corp. is more attractive than Bird Construction, Inc..

Bird Construction, Inc. has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Savaria Corp. has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.0029999999999974%.

Bird Construction, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Savaria Corp. offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Bird Construction, Inc. pays 31.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Savaria Corp. pays out 77.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bird Construction, Inc. quarterly revenues are $951.4M, which are larger than Savaria Corp. quarterly revenues of $224.8M. Bird Construction, Inc.'s net income of $31.7M is higher than Savaria Corp.'s net income of $19.5M. Notably, Bird Construction, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.18x while Savaria Corp.'s PE ratio is 26.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bird Construction, Inc. is 0.47x versus 1.86x for Savaria Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.