BDT.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Beyond Medical Technologies has a net margin of 4.03% compared to Bird Construction's net margin of --. Bird Construction's return on equity of 26.82% beat Beyond Medical Technologies's return on equity of --.

Bird Construction has a consensus price target of $21.31, signalling upside risk potential of 47.77%. On the other hand Beyond Medical Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bird Construction has higher upside potential than Beyond Medical Technologies, analysts believe Bird Construction is more attractive than Beyond Medical Technologies.

Bird Construction has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.878% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beyond Medical Technologies has a beta of 3.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 200.719%.

Bird Construction has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Beyond Medical Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bird Construction pays 31.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Beyond Medical Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bird Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bird Construction quarterly revenues are $898.9M, which are larger than Beyond Medical Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Bird Construction's net income of $36.2M is higher than Beyond Medical Technologies's net income of -$100.2K. Notably, Bird Construction's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.17x while Beyond Medical Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bird Construction is 0.40x versus -- for Beyond Medical Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newlox Gold Ventures has a net margin of 4.03% compared to Bird Construction's net margin of -213.66%. Bird Construction's return on equity of 26.82% beat Newlox Gold Ventures's return on equity of -271.28%.

Bird Construction has a consensus price target of $21.31, signalling upside risk potential of 47.77%. On the other hand Newlox Gold Ventures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bird Construction has higher upside potential than Newlox Gold Ventures, analysts believe Bird Construction is more attractive than Newlox Gold Ventures.

Bird Construction has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.878% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newlox Gold Ventures has a beta of 2.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.151%.

Bird Construction has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Newlox Gold Ventures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bird Construction pays 31.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Newlox Gold Ventures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bird Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bird Construction quarterly revenues are $898.9M, which are larger than Newlox Gold Ventures quarterly revenues of $395.5K. Bird Construction's net income of $36.2M is higher than Newlox Gold Ventures's net income of -$845.1K. Notably, Bird Construction's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.17x while Newlox Gold Ventures's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bird Construction is 0.40x versus 8.44x for Newlox Gold Ventures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ParcelPal Logistics has a net margin of 4.03% compared to Bird Construction's net margin of --. Bird Construction's return on equity of 26.82% beat ParcelPal Logistics's return on equity of --.

Bird Construction has a consensus price target of $21.31, signalling upside risk potential of 47.77%. On the other hand ParcelPal Logistics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bird Construction has higher upside potential than ParcelPal Logistics, analysts believe Bird Construction is more attractive than ParcelPal Logistics.

Bird Construction has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.878% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ParcelPal Logistics has a beta of -22,435,040.112, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2243504111.178%.

Bird Construction has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. ParcelPal Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $7,612,115.00 per share. Bird Construction pays 31.54% of its earnings as a dividend. ParcelPal Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bird Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bird Construction quarterly revenues are $898.9M, which are larger than ParcelPal Logistics quarterly revenues of --. Bird Construction's net income of $36.2M is higher than ParcelPal Logistics's net income of --. Notably, Bird Construction's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.17x while ParcelPal Logistics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bird Construction is 0.40x versus 0.03x for ParcelPal Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sharc International Systems has a net margin of 4.03% compared to Bird Construction's net margin of -105.98%. Bird Construction's return on equity of 26.82% beat Sharc International Systems's return on equity of -160.68%.

Bird Construction has a consensus price target of $21.31, signalling upside risk potential of 47.77%. On the other hand Sharc International Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bird Construction has higher upside potential than Sharc International Systems, analysts believe Bird Construction is more attractive than Sharc International Systems.

Bird Construction has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.878% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sharc International Systems has a beta of 0.611, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.929%.

Bird Construction has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Sharc International Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bird Construction pays 31.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Sharc International Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bird Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bird Construction quarterly revenues are $898.9M, which are larger than Sharc International Systems quarterly revenues of $785K. Bird Construction's net income of $36.2M is higher than Sharc International Systems's net income of -$832K. Notably, Bird Construction's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.17x while Sharc International Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bird Construction is 0.40x versus 11.08x for Sharc International Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.