AIM.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Aimia, Inc.'s net margin of 25.53%. Aimia, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.52% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.

Aimia, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.88, signalling upside risk potential of 33.93%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aimia, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe Aimia, Inc. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..

Aimia, Inc. has a beta of 0.193, which suggesting that the stock is 80.746% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.573%.

Aimia, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aimia, Inc. pays 27.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aimia, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aimia, Inc. quarterly revenues are $126.4M, which are larger than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Aimia, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, Aimia, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aimia, Inc. is 0.51x versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Aimia, Inc.'s net margin of -74.66%. Aimia, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.52% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -65.23%.

Aimia, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.88, signalling upside risk potential of 33.93%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 221.43%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Aimia, Inc., analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. is more attractive than Aimia, Inc..

Aimia, Inc. has a beta of 0.193, which suggesting that the stock is 80.746% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.18%.

Aimia, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aimia, Inc. pays 27.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aimia, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aimia, Inc. quarterly revenues are $126.4M, which are larger than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2M. Aimia, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Aimia, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 151.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aimia, Inc. is 0.51x versus 3.28x for Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Organic Potash Corp. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Aimia, Inc.'s net margin of --. Aimia, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.52% beat Organic Potash Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Aimia, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.88, signalling upside risk potential of 33.93%. On the other hand Organic Potash Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aimia, Inc. has higher upside potential than Organic Potash Corp., analysts believe Aimia, Inc. is more attractive than Organic Potash Corp..

Aimia, Inc. has a beta of 0.193, which suggesting that the stock is 80.746% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash Corp. has a beta of -0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 166.856%.

Aimia, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aimia, Inc. pays 27.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aimia, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aimia, Inc. quarterly revenues are $126.4M, which are larger than Organic Potash Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Aimia, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Organic Potash Corp.'s net income of -$23.7K. Notably, Aimia, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Organic Potash Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aimia, Inc. is 0.51x versus -- for Organic Potash Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SureNano Science Ltd. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Aimia, Inc.'s net margin of --. Aimia, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.52% beat SureNano Science Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Aimia, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.88, signalling upside risk potential of 33.93%. On the other hand SureNano Science Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aimia, Inc. has higher upside potential than SureNano Science Ltd., analysts believe Aimia, Inc. is more attractive than SureNano Science Ltd..

Aimia, Inc. has a beta of 0.193, which suggesting that the stock is 80.746% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SureNano Science Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aimia, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SureNano Science Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aimia, Inc. pays 27.48% of its earnings as a dividend. SureNano Science Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aimia, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aimia, Inc. quarterly revenues are $126.4M, which are larger than SureNano Science Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Aimia, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than SureNano Science Ltd.'s net income of -$35.5K. Notably, Aimia, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SureNano Science Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aimia, Inc. is 0.51x versus -- for SureNano Science Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.