ZION Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coastal Financial has a net margin of 27.02% compared to Zions Bancorp NA's net margin of 11.45%. Zions Bancorp NA's return on equity of 11.87% beat Coastal Financial's return on equity of 13.34%.

Zions Bancorp NA has a consensus price target of $60.10, signalling upside risk potential of 11.94%. On the other hand Coastal Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.78%. Given that Zions Bancorp NA has higher upside potential than Coastal Financial, analysts believe Zions Bancorp NA is more attractive than Coastal Financial.

Zions Bancorp NA has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.227% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coastal Financial has a beta of 1.243, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.319%.

Zions Bancorp NA has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.09%. Coastal Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zions Bancorp NA pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Coastal Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zions Bancorp NA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zions Bancorp NA quarterly revenues are $792M, which are larger than Coastal Financial quarterly revenues of $117.6M. Zions Bancorp NA's net income of $214M is higher than Coastal Financial's net income of $13.5M. Notably, Zions Bancorp NA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.23x while Coastal Financial's PE ratio is 27.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zions Bancorp NA is 2.61x versus 2.50x for Coastal Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fulton Financial has a net margin of 27.02% compared to Zions Bancorp NA's net margin of 19.47%. Zions Bancorp NA's return on equity of 11.87% beat Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

Zions Bancorp NA has a consensus price target of $60.10, signalling upside risk potential of 11.94%. On the other hand Fulton Financial has an analysts' consensus of $22.83 which suggests that it could grow by 16.38%. Given that Fulton Financial has higher upside potential than Zions Bancorp NA, analysts believe Fulton Financial is more attractive than Zions Bancorp NA.

Zions Bancorp NA has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.227% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.555%.

Zions Bancorp NA has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.09%. Fulton Financial offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Zions Bancorp NA pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Fulton Financial pays out 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zions Bancorp NA quarterly revenues are $792M, which are larger than Fulton Financial quarterly revenues of $324.6M. Zions Bancorp NA's net income of $214M is higher than Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M. Notably, Zions Bancorp NA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.23x while Fulton Financial's PE ratio is 12.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zions Bancorp NA is 2.61x versus 3.01x for Fulton Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a net margin of 27.02% compared to Zions Bancorp NA's net margin of 27.47%. Zions Bancorp NA's return on equity of 11.87% beat Penns Woods Bancorp's return on equity of 10.18%.

Zions Bancorp NA has a consensus price target of $60.10, signalling upside risk potential of 11.94%. On the other hand Penns Woods Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Zions Bancorp NA has higher upside potential than Penns Woods Bancorp, analysts believe Zions Bancorp NA is more attractive than Penns Woods Bancorp.

Zions Bancorp NA has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.227% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penns Woods Bancorp has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.813%.

Zions Bancorp NA has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.09%. Penns Woods Bancorp offers a yield of 4.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Zions Bancorp NA pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Penns Woods Bancorp pays out 55.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zions Bancorp NA quarterly revenues are $792M, which are larger than Penns Woods Bancorp quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Zions Bancorp NA's net income of $214M is higher than Penns Woods Bancorp's net income of $4.8M. Notably, Zions Bancorp NA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.23x while Penns Woods Bancorp's PE ratio is 11.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zions Bancorp NA is 2.61x versus 3.52x for Penns Woods Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMB Financial has a net margin of 27.02% compared to Zions Bancorp NA's net margin of 30.13%. Zions Bancorp NA's return on equity of 11.87% beat UMB Financial's return on equity of 12.39%.

Zions Bancorp NA has a consensus price target of $60.10, signalling upside risk potential of 11.94%. On the other hand UMB Financial has an analysts' consensus of $138.89 which suggests that it could grow by 21.18%. Given that UMB Financial has higher upside potential than Zions Bancorp NA, analysts believe UMB Financial is more attractive than Zions Bancorp NA.

Zions Bancorp NA has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.227% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMB Financial has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.731%.

Zions Bancorp NA has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.09%. UMB Financial offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Zions Bancorp NA pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. UMB Financial pays out 21.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zions Bancorp NA quarterly revenues are $792M, which are larger than UMB Financial quarterly revenues of $363.9M. Zions Bancorp NA's net income of $214M is higher than UMB Financial's net income of $109.6M. Notably, Zions Bancorp NA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.23x while UMB Financial's PE ratio is 14.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zions Bancorp NA is 2.61x versus 3.99x for UMB Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.