WM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a net margin of 13.55% compared to Waste Management's net margin of -53.41%. Waste Management's return on equity of 36.31% beat Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.49%.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $231.85, signalling upside risk potential of 12.64%. On the other hand Perma-Fix Environmental Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 102.21%. Given that Perma-Fix Environmental Services has higher upside potential than Waste Management, analysts believe Perma-Fix Environmental Services is more attractive than Waste Management.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.249% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.419, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.12%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management pays 49.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues of $16.8M. Waste Management's net income of $760M is higher than Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$9M. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.47x while Perma-Fix Environmental Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 3.89x versus 2.34x for Perma-Fix Environmental Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacific Green Technologies has a net margin of 13.55% compared to Waste Management's net margin of --. Waste Management's return on equity of 36.31% beat Pacific Green Technologies's return on equity of --.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $231.85, signalling upside risk potential of 12.64%. On the other hand Pacific Green Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Waste Management has higher upside potential than Pacific Green Technologies, analysts believe Waste Management is more attractive than Pacific Green Technologies.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.249% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Green Technologies has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.727%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Pacific Green Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management pays 49.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Green Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Pacific Green Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Waste Management's net income of $760M is higher than Pacific Green Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.47x while Pacific Green Technologies's PE ratio is 3.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 3.89x versus 0.28x for Pacific Green Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plastic2Oil has a net margin of 13.55% compared to Waste Management's net margin of --. Waste Management's return on equity of 36.31% beat Plastic2Oil's return on equity of --.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $231.85, signalling upside risk potential of 12.64%. On the other hand Plastic2Oil has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Waste Management has higher upside potential than Plastic2Oil, analysts believe Waste Management is more attractive than Plastic2Oil.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.249% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plastic2Oil has a beta of -0.229, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.927%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Plastic2Oil offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management pays 49.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Plastic2Oil pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Plastic2Oil quarterly revenues of --. Waste Management's net income of $760M is higher than Plastic2Oil's net income of --. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.47x while Plastic2Oil's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 3.89x versus -- for Plastic2Oil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quest Resource Holding has a net margin of 13.55% compared to Waste Management's net margin of -4.65%. Waste Management's return on equity of 36.31% beat Quest Resource Holding's return on equity of -12%.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $231.85, signalling upside risk potential of 12.64%. On the other hand Quest Resource Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 86.11%. Given that Quest Resource Holding has higher upside potential than Waste Management, analysts believe Quest Resource Holding is more attractive than Waste Management.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.249% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quest Resource Holding has a beta of 0.620, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.984%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Quest Resource Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management pays 49.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Resource Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Quest Resource Holding quarterly revenues of $72.8M. Waste Management's net income of $760M is higher than Quest Resource Holding's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.47x while Quest Resource Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 3.89x versus 0.43x for Quest Resource Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.