WM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 9.36% compared to Waste Management, Inc.'s net margin of --. Waste Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.42% beat Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Waste Management, Inc. has a consensus price target of $246.52, signalling upside risk potential of 15.09%. On the other hand Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Waste Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Waste Management, Inc. is more attractive than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc..

Waste Management, Inc. has a beta of 0.584, which suggesting that the stock is 41.647% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 90.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8965.269%.

Waste Management, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management, Inc. pays 44.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Waste Management, Inc.'s net income of $603M is higher than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Waste Management, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.75x while Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management, Inc. is 3.49x versus 0.77x for Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rainmaker Worldwide has a net margin of 9.36% compared to Waste Management, Inc.'s net margin of --. Waste Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.42% beat Rainmaker Worldwide's return on equity of --.

Waste Management, Inc. has a consensus price target of $246.52, signalling upside risk potential of 15.09%. On the other hand Rainmaker Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Waste Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rainmaker Worldwide, analysts believe Waste Management, Inc. is more attractive than Rainmaker Worldwide.

Waste Management, Inc. has a beta of 0.584, which suggesting that the stock is 41.647% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rainmaker Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Waste Management, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Rainmaker Worldwide offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management, Inc. pays 44.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Rainmaker Worldwide pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Rainmaker Worldwide quarterly revenues of --. Waste Management, Inc.'s net income of $603M is higher than Rainmaker Worldwide's net income of --. Notably, Waste Management, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.75x while Rainmaker Worldwide's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management, Inc. is 3.49x versus -- for Rainmaker Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Republic Services, Inc. has a net margin of 9.36% compared to Waste Management, Inc.'s net margin of 13.06%. Waste Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.42% beat Republic Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.1%.

Waste Management, Inc. has a consensus price target of $246.52, signalling upside risk potential of 15.09%. On the other hand Republic Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $247.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.82%. Given that Waste Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Republic Services, Inc., analysts believe Waste Management, Inc. is more attractive than Republic Services, Inc..

Waste Management, Inc. has a beta of 0.584, which suggesting that the stock is 41.647% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.574%.

Waste Management, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Republic Services, Inc. offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Waste Management, Inc. pays 44.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services, Inc. pays out 34.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Republic Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Waste Management, Inc.'s net income of $603M is higher than Republic Services, Inc.'s net income of $550M. Notably, Waste Management, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.75x while Republic Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management, Inc. is 3.49x versus 4.08x for Republic Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veralto Corp. has a net margin of 9.36% compared to Waste Management, Inc.'s net margin of 17.02%. Waste Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.42% beat Veralto Corp.'s return on equity of 38.61%.

Waste Management, Inc. has a consensus price target of $246.52, signalling upside risk potential of 15.09%. On the other hand Veralto Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $115.24 which suggests that it could grow by 12%. Given that Waste Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Veralto Corp., analysts believe Waste Management, Inc. is more attractive than Veralto Corp..

Waste Management, Inc. has a beta of 0.584, which suggesting that the stock is 41.647% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veralto Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Waste Management, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Veralto Corp. offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Waste Management, Inc. pays 44.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Veralto Corp. pays out 11.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Veralto Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Waste Management, Inc.'s net income of $603M is higher than Veralto Corp.'s net income of $239M. Notably, Waste Management, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.75x while Veralto Corp.'s PE ratio is 28.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management, Inc. is 3.49x versus 4.72x for Veralto Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.