WHR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bloomin Brands has a net margin of 2.73% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 0.67%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 19.94% beat Bloomin Brands's return on equity of -1.6%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -3.95%. On the other hand Bloomin Brands has an analysts' consensus of $20.75 which suggests that it could grow by 40.9%. Given that Bloomin Brands has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe Bloomin Brands is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.454, which suggesting that the stock is 45.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bloomin Brands has a beta of 1.945, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.535%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.05%. Bloomin Brands offers a yield of 8.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Whirlpool pays 79.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Bloomin Brands pays out 33.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Bloomin Brands quarterly revenues of $1B. Whirlpool's net income of $109M is higher than Bloomin Brands's net income of $6.9M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.41x while Bloomin Brands's PE ratio is 67.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.36x versus 0.23x for Bloomin Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iRobot has a net margin of 2.73% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of -3.29%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 19.94% beat iRobot's return on equity of -69.28%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -3.95%. On the other hand iRobot has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 55.21%. Given that iRobot has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe iRobot is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.454, which suggesting that the stock is 45.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iRobot has a beta of 0.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.904%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.05%. iRobot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Whirlpool pays 79.83% of its earnings as a dividend. iRobot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Whirlpool's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than iRobot quarterly revenues of $193.4M. Whirlpool's net income of $109M is higher than iRobot's net income of -$6.4M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.41x while iRobot's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.36x versus 0.26x for iRobot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of 2.73% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 20.2%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 19.94% beat Mattel's return on equity of 26.12%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -3.95%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $23.22 which suggests that it could grow by 34.48%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.454, which suggesting that the stock is 45.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.393%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.05%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Whirlpool pays 79.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Whirlpool's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Mattel quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Whirlpool's net income of $109M is lower than Mattel's net income of $372.4M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.41x while Mattel's PE ratio is 11.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.36x versus 1.15x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Wendy's has a net margin of 2.73% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 8.86%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 19.94% beat The Wendy's's return on equity of 65.49%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -3.95%. On the other hand The Wendy's has an analysts' consensus of $19.13 which suggests that it could grow by 24.32%. Given that The Wendy's has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe The Wendy's is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.454, which suggesting that the stock is 45.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wendy's has a beta of 0.766, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.359%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.05%. The Wendy's offers a yield of 6.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Whirlpool pays 79.83% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wendy's pays out 102.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Whirlpool's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Wendy's's is not.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than The Wendy's quarterly revenues of $566.7M. Whirlpool's net income of $109M is higher than The Wendy's's net income of $50.2M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.41x while The Wendy's's PE ratio is 17.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.36x versus 1.54x for The Wendy's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.