TROW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Franklin Resources has a net margin of 27.81% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 7.17%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11% beat Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $93.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1.73%. On the other hand Franklin Resources has an analysts' consensus of $19.14 which suggests that it could fall by -8.18%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 49.998% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.392, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.199%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.46%. Franklin Resources offers a yield of 6.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Resources pays out 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Franklin Resources quarterly revenues of $2.1B. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M is higher than Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.37x while Franklin Resources's PE ratio is 30.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 2.87x versus 1.24x for Franklin Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blackstone has a net margin of 27.81% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 21.75%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11% beat Blackstone's return on equity of 13.25%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $93.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1.73%. On the other hand Blackstone has an analysts' consensus of $145.38 which suggests that it could grow by 3.99%. Given that Blackstone has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe Blackstone is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 49.998% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone has a beta of 1.674, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.367%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.46%. Blackstone offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone pays out 159.34% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blackstone's is not.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Blackstone quarterly revenues of $2.8B. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M is lower than Blackstone's net income of $614.9M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.37x while Blackstone's PE ratio is 42.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 2.87x versus 10.05x for Blackstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of 27.81% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of -94.79%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of 19.72%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $93.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1.73%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $19.46 which suggests that it could grow by 36.19%. Given that MARA Holdings has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe MARA Holdings is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 49.998% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.822, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 582.181%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.46%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $214.4M. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M is lower than MARA Holdings's net income of $528.5M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.37x while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 2.87x versus 6.75x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 27.81% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 1.3%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $93.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1.73%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $81.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.45%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 49.998% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.088%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.46%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.37x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 16.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 2.87x versus 1.14x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.