TROW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Federated Hermes, Inc. has a net margin of 23.24% compared to T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s net margin of 22.41%. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.34% beat Federated Hermes, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.99%.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $102.08, signalling upside risk potential of 7.03%. On the other hand Federated Hermes, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $54.71 which suggests that it could fall by -2.09%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Federated Hermes, Inc., analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is more attractive than Federated Hermes, Inc..

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.535, which suggesting that the stock is 53.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federated Hermes, Inc. has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.332%.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Federated Hermes, Inc. offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. pays 54.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes, Inc. pays out 25.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Federated Hermes, Inc. quarterly revenues of $482.8M. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s net income of $449.5M is higher than Federated Hermes, Inc.'s net income of $108.2M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.32x while Federated Hermes, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is 2.87x versus 2.32x for Federated Hermes, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has a net margin of 23.24% compared to T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s net margin of 17.32%. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.34% beat The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.82%.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $102.08, signalling upside risk potential of 7.03%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $959.20 which suggests that it could grow by 4.01%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is more attractive than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc..

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.535, which suggesting that the stock is 53.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.946%.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.00 per share. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. pays 54.95% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. pays out 27.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $26.7B. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s net income of $449.5M is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s net income of $4.6B. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.32x while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is 2.87x versus 2.41x for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Invesco Ltd. has a net margin of 23.24% compared to T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s net margin of -58.86%. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.34% beat Invesco Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.18%.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $102.08, signalling upside risk potential of 7.03%. On the other hand Invesco Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $30.09 which suggests that it could grow by 13.68%. Given that Invesco Ltd. has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., analysts believe Invesco Ltd. is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group, Inc..

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.535, which suggesting that the stock is 53.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Ltd. has a beta of 1.688, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.752%.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Invesco Ltd. offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. pays 54.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Ltd. pays out 69.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Invesco Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s net income of $449.5M is higher than Invesco Ltd.'s net income of -$995.9M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.32x while Invesco Ltd.'s PE ratio is 19.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is 2.87x versus 1.85x for Invesco Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has a net margin of 23.24% compared to T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s net margin of 19.95%. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.34% beat Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.96%.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $102.08, signalling upside risk potential of 7.03%. On the other hand Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.47 which suggests that it could grow by 61.58%. Given that Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., analysts believe Blue Owl Capital, Inc. is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group, Inc..

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.535, which suggesting that the stock is 53.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has a beta of 1.111, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.07%.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Blue Owl Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 8.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. pays 54.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Owl Capital, Inc. pays out 828.49% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s is not.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Blue Owl Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of $755.6M. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s net income of $449.5M is higher than Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s net income of $150.7M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.32x while Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is 175.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is 2.87x versus 3.33x for Blue Owl Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.