STX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dell Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 20.88% compared to Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's net margin of 5.72%. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's return on equity of -- beat Dell Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of $297.09, signalling upside risk potential of 3.8%. On the other hand Dell Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $163.30 which suggests that it could grow by 26.36%. Given that Dell Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Seagate Technology Holdings Plc, analysts believe Dell Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Seagate Technology Holdings Plc.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.596, which suggesting that the stock is 59.569% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dell Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.647%.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Dell Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc pays 42.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Dell Technologies, Inc. pays out 27.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Dell Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $27B. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's net income of $549M is lower than Dell Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.74x while Dell Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seagate Technology Holdings Plc is 6.57x versus 0.86x for Dell Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pure Storage, Inc. has a net margin of 20.88% compared to Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's net margin of 5.68%. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's return on equity of -- beat Pure Storage, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.75%.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of $297.09, signalling upside risk potential of 3.8%. On the other hand Pure Storage, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $95.16 which suggests that it could grow by 37.35%. Given that Pure Storage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Seagate Technology Holdings Plc, analysts believe Pure Storage, Inc. is more attractive than Seagate Technology Holdings Plc.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.596, which suggesting that the stock is 59.569% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pure Storage, Inc. has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.529%.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Pure Storage, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc pays 42.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Pure Storage, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Pure Storage, Inc. quarterly revenues of $964.5M. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's net income of $549M is higher than Pure Storage, Inc.'s net income of $54.8M. Notably, Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.74x while Pure Storage, Inc.'s PE ratio is 182.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seagate Technology Holdings Plc is 6.57x versus 6.73x for Pure Storage, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sandisk has a net margin of 20.88% compared to Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's net margin of --. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's return on equity of -- beat Sandisk's return on equity of --.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of $297.09, signalling upside risk potential of 3.8%. On the other hand Sandisk has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Sandisk, analysts believe Seagate Technology Holdings Plc is more attractive than Sandisk.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.596, which suggesting that the stock is 59.569% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sandisk has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Sandisk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc pays 42.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandisk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Sandisk quarterly revenues of --. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's net income of $549M is higher than Sandisk's net income of --. Notably, Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.74x while Sandisk's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seagate Technology Holdings Plc is 6.57x versus -- for Sandisk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Digital Corp. has a net margin of 20.88% compared to Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's net margin of 41.06%. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's return on equity of -- beat Western Digital Corp.'s return on equity of 34.37%.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of $297.09, signalling upside risk potential of 3.8%. On the other hand Western Digital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $187.21 which suggests that it could grow by 3.12%. Given that Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Western Digital Corp., analysts believe Seagate Technology Holdings Plc is more attractive than Western Digital Corp..

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.596, which suggesting that the stock is 59.569% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Digital Corp. has a beta of 1.827, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.708%.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Western Digital Corp. offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc pays 42.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Western Digital Corp. pays out 2.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Western Digital Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's net income of $549M is lower than Western Digital Corp.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.74x while Western Digital Corp.'s PE ratio is 26.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seagate Technology Holdings Plc is 6.57x versus 5.49x for Western Digital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.