SCHW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Forge Global Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 33.49% compared to The Charles Schwab Corp.'s net margin of -44.84%. The Charles Schwab Corp.'s return on equity of 16.87% beat Forge Global Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -27.94%.

The Charles Schwab Corp. has a consensus price target of $111.95, signalling upside risk potential of 17.55%. On the other hand Forge Global Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $46.33 which suggests that it could fall by -3.96%. Given that The Charles Schwab Corp. has higher upside potential than Forge Global Holdings, Inc., analysts believe The Charles Schwab Corp. is more attractive than Forge Global Holdings, Inc..

The Charles Schwab Corp. has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.146% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forge Global Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Charles Schwab Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Forge Global Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Charles Schwab Corp. pays 33.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Forge Global Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Charles Schwab Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Charles Schwab Corp. quarterly revenues are $7B, which are larger than Forge Global Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $27.7M. The Charles Schwab Corp.'s net income of $2.4B is higher than Forge Global Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$12.4M. Notably, The Charles Schwab Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.33x while Forge Global Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Charles Schwab Corp. is 6.39x versus 47.82x for Forge Global Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a net margin of 33.49% compared to The Charles Schwab Corp.'s net margin of 43.64%. The Charles Schwab Corp.'s return on equity of 16.87% beat Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.58%.

The Charles Schwab Corp. has a consensus price target of $111.95, signalling upside risk potential of 17.55%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $154.24 which suggests that it could grow by 18.32%. Given that Robinhood Markets, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Charles Schwab Corp., analysts believe Robinhood Markets, Inc. is more attractive than The Charles Schwab Corp..

The Charles Schwab Corp. has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.146% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Charles Schwab Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Robinhood Markets, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Charles Schwab Corp. pays 33.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Charles Schwab Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Charles Schwab Corp. quarterly revenues are $7B, which are larger than Robinhood Markets, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. The Charles Schwab Corp.'s net income of $2.4B is higher than Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s net income of $556M. Notably, The Charles Schwab Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.33x while Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s PE ratio is 54.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Charles Schwab Corp. is 6.39x versus 28.10x for Robinhood Markets, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. has a net margin of 33.49% compared to The Charles Schwab Corp.'s net margin of 42.59%. The Charles Schwab Corp.'s return on equity of 16.87% beat Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.42%.

The Charles Schwab Corp. has a consensus price target of $111.95, signalling upside risk potential of 17.55%. On the other hand Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $76.64 which suggests that it could grow by 8.64%. Given that The Charles Schwab Corp. has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, Inc., analysts believe The Charles Schwab Corp. is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group, Inc..

The Charles Schwab Corp. has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.146% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.526%.

The Charles Schwab Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. The Charles Schwab Corp. pays 33.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. pays out 12.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Charles Schwab Corp. quarterly revenues are $7B, which are larger than Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. The Charles Schwab Corp.'s net income of $2.4B is higher than Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, The Charles Schwab Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.33x while Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Charles Schwab Corp. is 6.39x versus 3.08x for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 33.49% compared to The Charles Schwab Corp.'s net margin of 14.92%. The Charles Schwab Corp.'s return on equity of 16.87% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 15.16%.

The Charles Schwab Corp. has a consensus price target of $111.95, signalling upside risk potential of 17.55%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $168.15 which suggests that it could grow by 3.57%. Given that The Charles Schwab Corp. has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe The Charles Schwab Corp. is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

The Charles Schwab Corp. has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.146% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.332, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.169%.

The Charles Schwab Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. The Charles Schwab Corp. pays 33.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 44.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Charles Schwab Corp. quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $31.2B. The Charles Schwab Corp.'s net income of $2.4B is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $4.7B. Notably, The Charles Schwab Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.33x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 16.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Charles Schwab Corp. is 6.39x versus 2.29x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.