SCHW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlackRock has a net margin of 34.1% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 28.62%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33% beat BlackRock's return on equity of 14.59%.

Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $89.10, signalling upside risk potential of 5.61%. On the other hand BlackRock has an analysts' consensus of $1,023.32 which suggests that it could grow by 10.2%. Given that BlackRock has higher upside potential than Charles Schwab, analysts believe BlackRock is more attractive than Charles Schwab.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.903, which suggesting that the stock is 9.659% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackRock has a beta of 1.412, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.243%.

Charles Schwab has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. BlackRock offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.21 per share. Charles Schwab pays 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. BlackRock pays out 48.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Charles Schwab quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than BlackRock quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B is higher than BlackRock's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Charles Schwab's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.57x while BlackRock's PE ratio is 22.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Charles Schwab is 7.55x versus 6.79x for BlackRock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 34.1% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 36.25%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 21.41%.

Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $89.10, signalling upside risk potential of 5.61%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $59.29 which suggests that it could grow by 9.66%. Given that Robinhood Markets has higher upside potential than Charles Schwab, analysts believe Robinhood Markets is more attractive than Charles Schwab.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.903, which suggesting that the stock is 9.659% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Charles Schwab has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Charles Schwab pays 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Charles Schwab quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $927M. Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B is higher than Robinhood Markets's net income of $336M. Notably, Charles Schwab's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.57x while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 30.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Charles Schwab is 7.55x versus 15.27x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interactive Brokers Group has a net margin of 34.1% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 9.22%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96%.

Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $89.10, signalling upside risk potential of 5.61%. On the other hand Interactive Brokers Group has an analysts' consensus of $195.40 which suggests that it could grow by 5.91%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than Charles Schwab, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than Charles Schwab.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.903, which suggesting that the stock is 9.659% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.190, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.012%.

Charles Schwab has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Interactive Brokers Group offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Charles Schwab pays 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Charles Schwab quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B is higher than Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M. Notably, Charles Schwab's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.57x while Interactive Brokers Group's PE ratio is 25.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Charles Schwab is 7.55x versus 2.14x for Interactive Brokers Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 34.1% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 26.13%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.75%.

Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $89.10, signalling upside risk potential of 5.61%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $124.13 which suggests that it could grow by 1.84%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.903, which suggesting that the stock is 9.659% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.001%.

Charles Schwab has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Charles Schwab pays 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Charles Schwab quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $4.3B. Notably, Charles Schwab's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.57x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 14.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Charles Schwab is 7.55x versus 3.27x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.