SCHW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlackRock has a net margin of 29.05% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 31.38%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 12.12% beat BlackRock's return on equity of 14.5%.

Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $83.90, signalling upside risk potential of 12.91%. On the other hand BlackRock has an analysts' consensus of $1,141.71 which suggests that it could grow by 10.99%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than BlackRock, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than BlackRock.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackRock has a beta of 1.287, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.664%.

Charles Schwab has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. BlackRock offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.10 per share. Charles Schwab pays 44.92% of its earnings as a dividend. BlackRock pays out 55.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Charles Schwab quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than BlackRock quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Charles Schwab's net income of $1.4B is lower than BlackRock's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Charles Schwab's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.03x while BlackRock's PE ratio is 25.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Charles Schwab is 7.27x versus 7.96x for BlackRock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 29.05% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 23.55%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 12.12% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 7.61%.

Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $83.90, signalling upside risk potential of 12.91%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $45.24 which suggests that it could grow by 17.95%. Given that Robinhood Markets has higher upside potential than Charles Schwab, analysts believe Robinhood Markets is more attractive than Charles Schwab.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Charles Schwab has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Charles Schwab pays 44.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Charles Schwab quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $637M. Charles Schwab's net income of $1.4B is higher than Robinhood Markets's net income of $150M. Notably, Charles Schwab's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.03x while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 65.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Charles Schwab is 7.27x versus 14.14x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interactive Brokers Group has a net margin of 29.05% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 7.68%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 12.12% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.77%.

Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $83.90, signalling upside risk potential of 12.91%. On the other hand Interactive Brokers Group has an analysts' consensus of $195.80 which suggests that it could grow by 11.3%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.846, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.42%.

Charles Schwab has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Interactive Brokers Group offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Charles Schwab pays 44.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Charles Schwab quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Charles Schwab's net income of $1.4B is higher than Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $184M. Notably, Charles Schwab's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.03x while Interactive Brokers Group's PE ratio is 27.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Charles Schwab is 7.27x versus 2.12x for Interactive Brokers Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 29.05% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 22.23%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 12.12% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 11.05%.

Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $83.90, signalling upside risk potential of 12.91%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $127.69 which suggests that it could grow by 3.44%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.354, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.389%.

Charles Schwab has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Charles Schwab pays 44.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 63.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Charles Schwab quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $14.3B. Charles Schwab's net income of $1.4B is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Charles Schwab's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.03x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 18.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Charles Schwab is 7.27x versus 3.65x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.