RIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron Corp. has a net margin of -187.06% compared to Transocean Ltd.'s net margin of 7.49%. Transocean Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.45% beat Chevron Corp.'s return on equity of 8.03%.

Transocean Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.17, signalling downside risk potential of -5.97%. On the other hand Chevron Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $172.79 which suggests that it could grow by 13.49%. Given that Chevron Corp. has higher upside potential than Transocean Ltd., analysts believe Chevron Corp. is more attractive than Transocean Ltd..

Transocean Ltd. has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron Corp. has a beta of 0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.749%.

Transocean Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chevron Corp. offers a yield of 4.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Transocean Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron Corp. pays out 67.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Chevron Corp. quarterly revenues of $48.2B. Transocean Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9B is lower than Chevron Corp.'s net income of $3.6B. Notably, Transocean Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chevron Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean Ltd. is 1.03x versus 1.46x for Chevron Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -187.06% compared to Transocean Ltd.'s net margin of 27.5%. Transocean Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.45% beat Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.98%.

Transocean Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.17, signalling downside risk potential of -5.97%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $179.53 which suggests that it could grow by 12.55%. Given that Diamondback Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Transocean Ltd., analysts believe Diamondback Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Transocean Ltd..

Transocean Ltd. has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.337%.

Transocean Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamondback Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Transocean Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy, Inc. pays out 53.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Transocean Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9B is lower than Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Transocean Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean Ltd. is 1.03x versus 3.02x for Diamondback Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leopard Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -187.06% compared to Transocean Ltd.'s net margin of -1750%. Transocean Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.45% beat Leopard Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1169.22%.

Transocean Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.17, signalling downside risk potential of -5.97%. On the other hand Leopard Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transocean Ltd. has higher upside potential than Leopard Energy, Inc., analysts believe Transocean Ltd. is more attractive than Leopard Energy, Inc..

Transocean Ltd. has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leopard Energy, Inc. has a beta of -1.283, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 228.279%.

Transocean Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leopard Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leopard Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Leopard Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2K. Transocean Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9B is lower than Leopard Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$21K. Notably, Transocean Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leopard Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean Ltd. is 1.03x versus 42.72x for Leopard Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ovintiv, Inc. has a net margin of -187.06% compared to Transocean Ltd.'s net margin of 7.26%. Transocean Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.45% beat Ovintiv, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.28%.

Transocean Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.17, signalling downside risk potential of -5.97%. On the other hand Ovintiv, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.90 which suggests that it could grow by 27.48%. Given that Ovintiv, Inc. has higher upside potential than Transocean Ltd., analysts believe Ovintiv, Inc. is more attractive than Transocean Ltd..

Transocean Ltd. has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ovintiv, Inc. has a beta of 0.775, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.507%.

Transocean Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ovintiv, Inc. offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Transocean Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ovintiv, Inc. pays out 28.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Ovintiv, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Ovintiv, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2B. Transocean Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9B is lower than Ovintiv, Inc.'s net income of $148M. Notably, Transocean Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ovintiv, Inc.'s PE ratio is 46.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean Ltd. is 1.03x versus 1.24x for Ovintiv, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.