RIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron Corp. has a net margin of -187.06% compared to Transocean Ltd.'s net margin of 7.49%. Transocean Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.45% beat Chevron Corp.'s return on equity of 8.03%.

Transocean Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.16, signalling upside risk potential of 3.7%. On the other hand Chevron Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $172.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.51%. Given that Chevron Corp. has higher upside potential than Transocean Ltd., analysts believe Chevron Corp. is more attractive than Transocean Ltd..

Transocean Ltd. has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron Corp. has a beta of 0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.749%.

Transocean Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chevron Corp. offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Transocean Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron Corp. pays out 67.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Chevron Corp. quarterly revenues of $48.2B. Transocean Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9B is lower than Chevron Corp.'s net income of $3.6B. Notably, Transocean Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chevron Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean Ltd. is 0.93x versus 1.45x for Chevron Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -187.06% compared to Transocean Ltd.'s net margin of 27.5%. Transocean Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.45% beat Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.98%.

Transocean Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.16, signalling upside risk potential of 3.7%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $179.73 which suggests that it could grow by 22.34%. Given that Diamondback Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Transocean Ltd., analysts believe Diamondback Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Transocean Ltd..

Transocean Ltd. has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.337%.

Transocean Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamondback Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Transocean Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy, Inc. pays out 53.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Transocean Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9B is lower than Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Transocean Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean Ltd. is 0.93x versus 2.78x for Diamondback Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leopard Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -187.06% compared to Transocean Ltd.'s net margin of -200%. Transocean Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.45% beat Leopard Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1169.22%.

Transocean Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.16, signalling upside risk potential of 3.7%. On the other hand Leopard Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transocean Ltd. has higher upside potential than Leopard Energy, Inc., analysts believe Transocean Ltd. is more attractive than Leopard Energy, Inc..

Transocean Ltd. has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leopard Energy, Inc. has a beta of -1.283, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 228.279%.

Transocean Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leopard Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leopard Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Leopard Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2K. Transocean Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9B is lower than Leopard Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4K. Notably, Transocean Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leopard Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean Ltd. is 0.93x versus 36.96x for Leopard Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -187.06% compared to Transocean Ltd.'s net margin of -3.1%. Transocean Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.45% beat Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.96%.

Transocean Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.16, signalling upside risk potential of 3.7%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.20 which suggests that it could grow by 21.77%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Transocean Ltd., analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Transocean Ltd..

Transocean Ltd. has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.768, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.245%.

Transocean Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 5.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Transocean Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. pays out 13.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Transocean Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9B is lower than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$36.5M. Notably, Transocean Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean Ltd. is 0.93x versus 0.47x for Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.