RIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -187.06% compared to Transocean Ltd.'s net margin of 27.5%. Transocean Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.45% beat Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.98%.

Transocean Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.16, signalling upside risk potential of 3.44%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $179.73 which suggests that it could grow by 22.84%. Given that Diamondback Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Transocean Ltd., analysts believe Diamondback Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Transocean Ltd..

Transocean Ltd. has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.337%.

Transocean Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamondback Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Transocean Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy, Inc. pays out 53.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Transocean Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9B is lower than Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Transocean Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean Ltd. is 0.94x versus 2.77x for Diamondback Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leopard Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -187.06% compared to Transocean Ltd.'s net margin of -200%. Transocean Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.45% beat Leopard Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1169.22%.

Transocean Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.16, signalling upside risk potential of 3.44%. On the other hand Leopard Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transocean Ltd. has higher upside potential than Leopard Energy, Inc., analysts believe Transocean Ltd. is more attractive than Leopard Energy, Inc..

Transocean Ltd. has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leopard Energy, Inc. has a beta of -1.283, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 228.279%.

Transocean Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leopard Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leopard Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Leopard Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2K. Transocean Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9B is lower than Leopard Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4K. Notably, Transocean Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leopard Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean Ltd. is 0.94x versus 47.18x for Leopard Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nabors Industries Ltd. has a net margin of -187.06% compared to Transocean Ltd.'s net margin of 34.99%. Transocean Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.45% beat Nabors Industries Ltd.'s return on equity of 20.73%.

Transocean Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.16, signalling upside risk potential of 3.44%. On the other hand Nabors Industries Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $56.50 which suggests that it could grow by 7.33%. Given that Nabors Industries Ltd. has higher upside potential than Transocean Ltd., analysts believe Nabors Industries Ltd. is more attractive than Transocean Ltd..

Transocean Ltd. has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nabors Industries Ltd. has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.196%.

Transocean Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nabors Industries Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nabors Industries Ltd. pays out 0.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Nabors Industries Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Nabors Industries Ltd. quarterly revenues of $818.2M. Transocean Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9B is lower than Nabors Industries Ltd.'s net income of $286.3M. Notably, Transocean Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nabors Industries Ltd.'s PE ratio is 5.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean Ltd. is 0.94x versus 0.21x for Nabors Industries Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -187.06% compared to Transocean Ltd.'s net margin of -3.1%. Transocean Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.45% beat Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.96%.

Transocean Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.16, signalling upside risk potential of 3.44%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.20 which suggests that it could grow by 23.02%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Transocean Ltd., analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Transocean Ltd..

Transocean Ltd. has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.768, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.245%.

Transocean Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 5.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Transocean Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. pays out 13.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Transocean Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9B is lower than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$36.5M. Notably, Transocean Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean Ltd. is 0.94x versus 0.47x for Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.