RIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gran Tierra Energy has a net margin of -52.11% compared to Transocean's net margin of 0.75%. Transocean's return on equity of -5.97% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of 11.15%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $7.49, signalling upside risk potential of 48.66%. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $8.07 which suggests that it could grow by 11.4%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Gran Tierra Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Gran Tierra Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.749, which suggesting that the stock is 174.879% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 1.575, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.515%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gran Tierra Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $948M, which are larger than Gran Tierra Energy quarterly revenues of $151.4M. Transocean's net income of -$494M is lower than Gran Tierra Energy's net income of $1.1M. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gran Tierra Energy's PE ratio is 5.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.95x versus 0.36x for Gran Tierra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Houston American Energy has a net margin of -52.11% compared to Transocean's net margin of -111.16%. Transocean's return on equity of -5.97% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -32.89%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $7.49, signalling upside risk potential of 48.66%. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.749, which suggesting that the stock is 174.879% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.938%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $948M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $130.2K. Transocean's net income of -$494M is lower than Houston American Energy's net income of -$144.8K. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.95x versus 21.29x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mexco Energy has a net margin of -52.11% compared to Transocean's net margin of 18.13%. Transocean's return on equity of -5.97% beat Mexco Energy's return on equity of 6.97%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $7.49, signalling upside risk potential of 48.66%. On the other hand Mexco Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.749, which suggesting that the stock is 174.879% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.786%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mexco Energy offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy pays out 15.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $948M, which are larger than Mexco Energy quarterly revenues of $1.7M. Transocean's net income of -$494M is lower than Mexco Energy's net income of $317.2K. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mexco Energy's PE ratio is 19.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.95x versus 3.36x for Mexco Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seadrill has a net margin of -52.11% compared to Transocean's net margin of 9.04%. Transocean's return on equity of -5.97% beat Seadrill's return on equity of 13.94%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $7.49, signalling upside risk potential of 48.66%. On the other hand Seadrill has an analysts' consensus of $54.78 which suggests that it could grow by 49.22%. Given that Seadrill has higher upside potential than Transocean, analysts believe Seadrill is more attractive than Transocean.

Transocean has a beta of 2.749, which suggesting that the stock is 174.879% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seadrill has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seadrill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seadrill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $948M, which are larger than Seadrill quarterly revenues of $354M. Transocean's net income of -$494M is lower than Seadrill's net income of $32M. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seadrill's PE ratio is 6.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.95x versus 1.79x for Seadrill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.