PM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Altria Group has a net margin of -5.97% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 59.52%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Altria Group's return on equity of --.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $149.79, signalling downside risk potential of -5.63%. On the other hand Altria Group has an analysts' consensus of $56.58 which suggests that it could fall by -5.73%. Given that Altria Group has more downside risk than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Philip Morris International is more attractive than Altria Group.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.48% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altria Group has a beta of 0.546, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.421%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. Altria Group offers a yield of 6.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Philip Morris International pays 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group pays out 60.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.7B, which are larger than Altria Group quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Philip Morris International's net income of -$579M is lower than Altria Group's net income of $3B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.20x while Altria Group's PE ratio is 9.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 6.52x versus 5.04x for Altria Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of -5.97% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 5.48%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $149.79, signalling downside risk potential of -5.63%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $162.96 which suggests that it could grow by 8.68%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.48% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.787%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Philip Morris International pays 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.7B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $27.8B. Philip Morris International's net income of -$579M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.20x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 21.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 6.52x versus 2.25x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of -5.97% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 21.16%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $149.79, signalling downside risk potential of -5.63%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $178.47 which suggests that it could grow by 4.72%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.48% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.448%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Philip Morris International pays 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.7B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.9B. Philip Morris International's net income of -$579M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.20x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 27.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 6.52x versus 4.98x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walmart has a net margin of -5.97% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 2.91%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Walmart's return on equity of 21.04%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $149.79, signalling downside risk potential of -5.63%. On the other hand Walmart has an analysts' consensus of $108.1085 which suggests that it could grow by 23.14%. Given that Walmart has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Walmart is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.48% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walmart has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.756%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. Walmart offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Philip Morris International pays 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Walmart pays out 34.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Walmart's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.7B, which are smaller than Walmart quarterly revenues of $180.6B. Philip Morris International's net income of -$579M is lower than Walmart's net income of $5.3B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.20x while Walmart's PE ratio is 36.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 6.52x versus 1.04x for Walmart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.