PM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a net margin of 31.1% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of -220.21%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Kaival Brands Innovations Group's return on equity of -58.63%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $108.09, signalling upside risk potential of 9.61%. On the other hand Kaival Brands Innovations Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 540.21%. Given that Kaival Brands Innovations Group has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Kaival Brands Innovations Group is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.475% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a beta of 0.076, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.372%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Kaival Brands Innovations Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Philip Morris International pays 101.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaival Brands Innovations Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than Kaival Brands Innovations Group quarterly revenues of $713.8K. Philip Morris International's net income of $3.1B is higher than Kaival Brands Innovations Group's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.72x while Kaival Brands Innovations Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 5.19x versus 0.25x for Kaival Brands Innovations Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 31.1% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 24.03%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $108.09, signalling upside risk potential of 9.61%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $73.72 which suggests that it could grow by 17.85%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.475% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.255%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Philip Morris International pays 101.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Philip Morris International's net income of $3.1B is higher than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.72x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 25.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 5.19x versus 5.83x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Altria Group has a net margin of 31.1% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 42.91%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Altria Group's return on equity of --.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $108.09, signalling upside risk potential of 9.61%. On the other hand Altria Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.5%. Given that Philip Morris International has higher upside potential than Altria Group, analysts believe Philip Morris International is more attractive than Altria Group.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.475% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altria Group has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.096%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Altria Group offers a yield of 7.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Philip Morris International pays 101.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group pays out 83.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than Altria Group quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Philip Morris International's net income of $3.1B is higher than Altria Group's net income of $2.3B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.72x while Altria Group's PE ratio is 9.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 5.19x versus 4.59x for Altria Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Turning Point Brands has a net margin of 31.1% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 11.72%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Turning Point Brands's return on equity of 29.17%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $108.09, signalling upside risk potential of 9.61%. On the other hand Turning Point Brands has an analysts' consensus of $68.75 which suggests that it could grow by 16.25%. Given that Turning Point Brands has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Turning Point Brands is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.475% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Turning Point Brands has a beta of 0.658, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.194%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Turning Point Brands offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Philip Morris International pays 101.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Turning Point Brands pays out 11.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Turning Point Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than Turning Point Brands quarterly revenues of $105.6M. Philip Morris International's net income of $3.1B is higher than Turning Point Brands's net income of $12.4M. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.72x while Turning Point Brands's PE ratio is 23.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 5.19x versus 2.88x for Turning Point Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.