NTAP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HP has a net margin of 18.22% compared to NetApp's net margin of 4.18%. NetApp's return on equity of 114.71% beat HP's return on equity of --.

NetApp has a consensus price target of $114.90, signalling upside risk potential of 35.36%. On the other hand HP has an analysts' consensus of $32.89 which suggests that it could grow by 33.53%. Given that NetApp has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe NetApp is more attractive than HP.

NetApp has a beta of 1.311, which suggesting that the stock is 31.087% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HP has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.205%.

NetApp has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. HP offers a yield of 4.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. NetApp pays 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. HP pays out 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetApp quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than HP quarterly revenues of $13.5B. NetApp's net income of $299M is lower than HP's net income of $565M. Notably, NetApp's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while HP's PE ratio is 8.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetApp is 2.75x versus 0.45x for HP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pure Storage has a net margin of 18.22% compared to NetApp's net margin of 4.82%. NetApp's return on equity of 114.71% beat Pure Storage's return on equity of 7.83%.

NetApp has a consensus price target of $114.90, signalling upside risk potential of 35.36%. On the other hand Pure Storage has an analysts' consensus of $67.81 which suggests that it could grow by 58.72%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than NetApp, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than NetApp.

NetApp has a beta of 1.311, which suggesting that the stock is 31.087% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pure Storage has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.593%.

NetApp has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Pure Storage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NetApp pays 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Pure Storage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetApp quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Pure Storage quarterly revenues of $879.8M. NetApp's net income of $299M is higher than Pure Storage's net income of $42.4M. Notably, NetApp's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while Pure Storage's PE ratio is 142.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetApp is 2.75x versus 4.56x for Pure Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 18.22% compared to NetApp's net margin of 5.65%. NetApp's return on equity of 114.71% beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 28.1%.

NetApp has a consensus price target of $114.90, signalling upside risk potential of 35.36%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $51.77 which suggests that it could grow by 57.34%. Given that Super Micro Computer has higher upside potential than NetApp, analysts believe Super Micro Computer is more attractive than NetApp.

NetApp has a beta of 1.311, which suggesting that the stock is 31.087% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.224, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.435%.

NetApp has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NetApp pays 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetApp quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $5.7B. NetApp's net income of $299M is lower than Super Micro Computer's net income of $320.6M. Notably, NetApp's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 13.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetApp is 2.75x versus 1.00x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Digital has a net margin of 18.22% compared to NetApp's net margin of 13.86%. NetApp's return on equity of 114.71% beat Western Digital's return on equity of 11.02%.

NetApp has a consensus price target of $114.90, signalling upside risk potential of 35.36%. On the other hand Western Digital has an analysts' consensus of $63.52 which suggests that it could grow by 68.48%. Given that Western Digital has higher upside potential than NetApp, analysts believe Western Digital is more attractive than NetApp.

NetApp has a beta of 1.311, which suggesting that the stock is 31.087% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Digital has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.958%.

NetApp has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Western Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NetApp pays 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Western Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetApp quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Western Digital quarterly revenues of $4.3B. NetApp's net income of $299M is lower than Western Digital's net income of $594M. Notably, NetApp's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while Western Digital's PE ratio is 8.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetApp is 2.75x versus 0.83x for Western Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.