NOV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NPK International, Inc. has a net margin of -3.56% compared to NOV, Inc.'s net margin of 14.26%. NOV, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.34% beat NPK International, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.78%.

NOV, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.90, signalling upside risk potential of 7.98%. On the other hand NPK International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.75 which suggests that it could grow by 40.34%. Given that NPK International, Inc. has higher upside potential than NOV, Inc., analysts believe NPK International, Inc. is more attractive than NOV, Inc..

NOV, Inc. has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NPK International, Inc. has a beta of 1.232, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.201%.

NOV, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. NPK International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NOV, Inc. pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. NPK International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NOV, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NOV, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than NPK International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $75.2M. NOV, Inc.'s net income of -$81M is lower than NPK International, Inc.'s net income of $10.7M. Notably, NOV, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.92x while NPK International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NOV, Inc. is 0.79x versus 4.13x for NPK International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oil States International, Inc. has a net margin of -3.56% compared to NOV, Inc.'s net margin of -65.54%. NOV, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.34% beat Oil States International, Inc.'s return on equity of -16.49%.

NOV, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.90, signalling upside risk potential of 7.98%. On the other hand Oil States International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.25 which suggests that it could grow by 3.03%. Given that NOV, Inc. has higher upside potential than Oil States International, Inc., analysts believe NOV, Inc. is more attractive than Oil States International, Inc..

NOV, Inc. has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oil States International, Inc. has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.556%.

NOV, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Oil States International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NOV, Inc. pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Oil States International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NOV, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NOV, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Oil States International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $178.5M. NOV, Inc.'s net income of -$81M is higher than Oil States International, Inc.'s net income of -$117M. Notably, NOV, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.92x while Oil States International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 97.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NOV, Inc. is 0.79x versus 1.04x for Oil States International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tristar Acquisition Group has a net margin of -3.56% compared to NOV, Inc.'s net margin of --. NOV, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.34% beat Tristar Acquisition Group's return on equity of --.

NOV, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.90, signalling upside risk potential of 7.98%. On the other hand Tristar Acquisition Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NOV, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tristar Acquisition Group, analysts believe NOV, Inc. is more attractive than Tristar Acquisition Group.

NOV, Inc. has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tristar Acquisition Group has a beta of 4.233, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 323.278%.

NOV, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Tristar Acquisition Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NOV, Inc. pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Tristar Acquisition Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NOV, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NOV, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Tristar Acquisition Group quarterly revenues of --. NOV, Inc.'s net income of -$81M is higher than Tristar Acquisition Group's net income of --. Notably, NOV, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.92x while Tristar Acquisition Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NOV, Inc. is 0.79x versus -- for Tristar Acquisition Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cactus, Inc. has a net margin of -3.56% compared to NOV, Inc.'s net margin of 18.49%. NOV, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.34% beat Cactus, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.95%.

NOV, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.90, signalling upside risk potential of 7.98%. On the other hand Cactus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $56.56 which suggests that it could grow by 21.99%. Given that Cactus, Inc. has higher upside potential than NOV, Inc., analysts believe Cactus, Inc. is more attractive than NOV, Inc..

NOV, Inc. has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cactus, Inc. has a beta of 1.252, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.163%.

NOV, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Cactus, Inc. offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. NOV, Inc. pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Cactus, Inc. pays out 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NOV, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Cactus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $261.2M. NOV, Inc.'s net income of -$81M is lower than Cactus, Inc.'s net income of $48.3M. Notably, NOV, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.92x while Cactus, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NOV, Inc. is 0.79x versus 2.97x for Cactus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.