NOC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Boeing Co. has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Northrop Grumman Corp.'s net margin of 34.33%. Northrop Grumman Corp.'s return on equity of 26.67% beat The Boeing Co.'s return on equity of --.

Northrop Grumman Corp. has a consensus price target of $724.39, signalling upside risk potential of 6.71%. On the other hand The Boeing Co. has an analysts' consensus of $272.25 which suggests that it could grow by 15.23%. Given that The Boeing Co. has higher upside potential than Northrop Grumman Corp., analysts believe The Boeing Co. is more attractive than Northrop Grumman Corp..

Northrop Grumman Corp. has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Boeing Co. has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.113%.

Northrop Grumman Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $2.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. The Boeing Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northrop Grumman Corp. pays 30.91% of its earnings as a dividend. The Boeing Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman Corp. quarterly revenues are $11.7B, which are smaller than The Boeing Co. quarterly revenues of $23.9B. Northrop Grumman Corp.'s net income of $1.4B is lower than The Boeing Co.'s net income of $8.2B. Notably, Northrop Grumman Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.26x while The Boeing Co.'s PE ratio is 124.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman Corp. is 2.32x versus 2.03x for The Boeing Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Dynamics Corp. has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Northrop Grumman Corp.'s net margin of 7.95%. Northrop Grumman Corp.'s return on equity of 26.67% beat General Dynamics Corp.'s return on equity of 17.85%.

Northrop Grumman Corp. has a consensus price target of $724.39, signalling upside risk potential of 6.71%. On the other hand General Dynamics Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $394.81 which suggests that it could grow by 13.88%. Given that General Dynamics Corp. has higher upside potential than Northrop Grumman Corp., analysts believe General Dynamics Corp. is more attractive than Northrop Grumman Corp..

Northrop Grumman Corp. has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics Corp. has a beta of 0.406, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.391%.

Northrop Grumman Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $2.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. General Dynamics Corp. offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Northrop Grumman Corp. pays 30.91% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics Corp. pays out 38.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman Corp. quarterly revenues are $11.7B, which are smaller than General Dynamics Corp. quarterly revenues of $14.4B. Northrop Grumman Corp.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than General Dynamics Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Northrop Grumman Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.26x while General Dynamics Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman Corp. is 2.32x versus 1.79x for General Dynamics Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Northrop Grumman Corp.'s net margin of 19.35%. Northrop Grumman Corp.'s return on equity of 26.67% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 44.62%.

Northrop Grumman Corp. has a consensus price target of $724.39, signalling upside risk potential of 6.71%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $357.35 which suggests that it could grow by 13.91%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than Northrop Grumman Corp., analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than Northrop Grumman Corp..

Northrop Grumman Corp. has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.407, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.683%.

Northrop Grumman Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $2.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Northrop Grumman Corp. pays 30.91% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 17.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman Corp. quarterly revenues are $11.7B, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Northrop Grumman Corp.'s net income of $1.4B is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2.5B. Notably, Northrop Grumman Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.26x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 38.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman Corp. is 2.32x versus 7.31x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Northrop Grumman Corp.'s net margin of 5.31%. Northrop Grumman Corp.'s return on equity of 26.67% beat L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.27%.

Northrop Grumman Corp. has a consensus price target of $724.39, signalling upside risk potential of 6.71%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $380.63 which suggests that it could grow by 11.86%. Given that L3Harris Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Northrop Grumman Corp., analysts believe L3Harris Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Northrop Grumman Corp..

Northrop Grumman Corp. has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.558%.

Northrop Grumman Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $2.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. L3Harris Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Northrop Grumman Corp. pays 30.91% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies, Inc. pays out 55.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman Corp. quarterly revenues are $11.7B, which are larger than L3Harris Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Northrop Grumman Corp.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $300M. Notably, Northrop Grumman Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.26x while L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman Corp. is 2.32x versus 2.93x for L3Harris Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.