MNST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Vita Coco Co., Inc. has a net margin of 23.87% compared to Monster Beverage Corp.'s net margin of 13.17%. Monster Beverage Corp.'s return on equity of 26.01% beat The Vita Coco Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 24.54%.

Monster Beverage Corp. has a consensus price target of $74.6818, signalling upside risk potential of 0.7%. On the other hand The Vita Coco Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.44 which suggests that it could grow by 1.51%. Given that The Vita Coco Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage Corp., analysts believe The Vita Coco Co., Inc. is more attractive than Monster Beverage Corp..

Monster Beverage Corp. has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.117% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Vita Coco Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Monster Beverage Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Vita Coco Co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Monster Beverage Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Vita Coco Co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Monster Beverage Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than The Vita Coco Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $182.3M. Monster Beverage Corp.'s net income of $524.5M is higher than The Vita Coco Co., Inc.'s net income of $24M. Notably, Monster Beverage Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.12x while The Vita Coco Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 47.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage Corp. is 9.12x versus 5.36x for The Vita Coco Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has a net margin of 23.87% compared to Monster Beverage Corp.'s net margin of 15.37%. Monster Beverage Corp.'s return on equity of 26.01% beat Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.38%.

Monster Beverage Corp. has a consensus price target of $74.6818, signalling upside risk potential of 0.7%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $34.73 which suggests that it could grow by 22.6%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage Corp., analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. is more attractive than Monster Beverage Corp..

Monster Beverage Corp. has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.117% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has a beta of 0.352, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.831%.

Monster Beverage Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. offers a yield of 3.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Monster Beverage Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. pays out 84.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monster Beverage Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Monster Beverage Corp.'s net income of $524.5M is lower than Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s net income of $662M. Notably, Monster Beverage Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.12x while Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage Corp. is 9.12x versus 2.38x for Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Coca-Cola Co. has a net margin of 23.87% compared to Monster Beverage Corp.'s net margin of 29.32%. Monster Beverage Corp.'s return on equity of 26.01% beat The Coca-Cola Co.'s return on equity of 44.72%.

Monster Beverage Corp. has a consensus price target of $74.6818, signalling upside risk potential of 0.7%. On the other hand The Coca-Cola Co. has an analysts' consensus of $79.13 which suggests that it could grow by 11.75%. Given that The Coca-Cola Co. has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage Corp., analysts believe The Coca-Cola Co. is more attractive than Monster Beverage Corp..

Monster Beverage Corp. has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.117% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Coca-Cola Co. has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.534%.

Monster Beverage Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Coca-Cola Co. offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Monster Beverage Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Coca-Cola Co. pays out 78.83% of its earnings as a dividend. The Coca-Cola Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monster Beverage Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than The Coca-Cola Co. quarterly revenues of $12.6B. Monster Beverage Corp.'s net income of $524.5M is lower than The Coca-Cola Co.'s net income of $3.7B. Notably, Monster Beverage Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.12x while The Coca-Cola Co.'s PE ratio is 23.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage Corp. is 9.12x versus 6.40x for The Coca-Cola Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo, Inc. has a net margin of 23.87% compared to Monster Beverage Corp.'s net margin of 10.94%. Monster Beverage Corp.'s return on equity of 26.01% beat PepsiCo, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.53%.

Monster Beverage Corp. has a consensus price target of $74.6818, signalling upside risk potential of 0.7%. On the other hand PepsiCo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $153.91 which suggests that it could grow by 3.95%. Given that PepsiCo, Inc. has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage Corp., analysts believe PepsiCo, Inc. is more attractive than Monster Beverage Corp..

Monster Beverage Corp. has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.117% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo, Inc. has a beta of 0.420, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.023%.

Monster Beverage Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo, Inc. offers a yield of 3.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Monster Beverage Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo, Inc. pays out 76.68% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monster Beverage Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than PepsiCo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.9B. Monster Beverage Corp.'s net income of $524.5M is lower than PepsiCo, Inc.'s net income of $2.6B. Notably, Monster Beverage Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.12x while PepsiCo, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage Corp. is 9.12x versus 2.20x for PepsiCo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.