MNST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Vita Coco has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Monster Beverage's net margin of 2.65%. Monster Beverage's return on equity of 21.93% beat The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.22%.

Monster Beverage has a consensus price target of $56.4671, signalling downside risk potential of -3.61%. On the other hand The Vita Coco has an analysts' consensus of $37.44 which suggests that it could grow by 25.11%. Given that The Vita Coco has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe The Vita Coco is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.833% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Monster Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Vita Coco offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Monster Beverage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Vita Coco pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Monster Beverage quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than The Vita Coco quarterly revenues of $127.3M. Monster Beverage's net income of $270.7M is higher than The Vita Coco's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Monster Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.84x while The Vita Coco's PE ratio is 31.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage is 7.92x versus 3.44x for The Vita Coco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Monster Beverage's net margin of -3.54%. Monster Beverage's return on equity of 21.93% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 5.8%.

Monster Beverage has a consensus price target of $56.4671, signalling downside risk potential of -3.61%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $37.76 which suggests that it could grow by 10.22%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.833% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.513%.

Monster Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Monster Beverage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monster Beverage quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Monster Beverage's net income of $270.7M is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of -$144M. Notably, Monster Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.84x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 32.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage is 7.92x versus 3.05x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Monster Beverage's net margin of 19.01%. Monster Beverage's return on equity of 21.93% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7%.

Monster Beverage has a consensus price target of $56.4671, signalling downside risk potential of -3.61%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $74.68 which suggests that it could grow by 5.57%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.833% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.943%.

Monster Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Monster Beverage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monster Beverage quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.5B. Monster Beverage's net income of $270.7M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Monster Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.84x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage is 7.92x versus 6.49x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Monster Beverage's net margin of 5.48%. Monster Beverage's return on equity of 21.93% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31%.

Monster Beverage has a consensus price target of $56.4671, signalling downside risk potential of -3.61%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $163.14 which suggests that it could grow by 9%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.833% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.125%.

Monster Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Monster Beverage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monster Beverage quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $27.8B. Monster Beverage's net income of $270.7M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Monster Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.84x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 21.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage is 7.92x versus 2.25x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.