LMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 7.97%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 16.9%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $576.12, signalling upside risk potential of 22.88%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $309.74 which suggests that it could grow by 19.13%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than General Dynamics.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.482, which suggesting that the stock is 51.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.616%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 43.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $17.1B, which are larger than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B is higher than General Dynamics's net income of $930M. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.98x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 19.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.59x versus 1.57x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 18.82%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 24.49%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $576.12, signalling upside risk potential of 22.88%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $210.12 which suggests that it could grow by 21.54%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.482, which suggesting that the stock is 51.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.359%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $17.1B, which are larger than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.98x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 30.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.59x versus 2.49x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 7.33%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.41%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $576.12, signalling upside risk potential of 22.88%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $135.78 which suggests that it could grow by 17.13%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than RTX.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.482, which suggesting that the stock is 51.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.837, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.306%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. RTX offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 101.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but RTX's is not.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $17.1B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.1B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B is higher than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.98x while RTX's PE ratio is 33.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.59x versus 1.97x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Textron has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 6.51%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37% beat Textron's return on equity of 12.66%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $576.12, signalling upside risk potential of 22.88%. On the other hand Textron has an analysts' consensus of $95.24 which suggests that it could grow by 25.31%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.482, which suggesting that the stock is 51.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Textron has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.963%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. Textron offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Textron pays out 1.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $17.1B, which are larger than Textron quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B is higher than Textron's net income of $223M. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.98x while Textron's PE ratio is 16.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.59x versus 1.05x for Textron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.