HST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BXP, Inc. has a net margin of 12.25% compared to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s net margin of -13.41%. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.99% beat BXP, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.88%.

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.79, signalling upside risk potential of 15.74%. On the other hand BXP, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $79.76 which suggests that it could grow by 16.39%. Given that BXP, Inc. has higher upside potential than Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., analysts believe BXP, Inc. is more attractive than Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc..

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.185, which suggesting that the stock is 18.526% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BXP, Inc. has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.667%.

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. BXP, Inc. offers a yield of 5.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pays 80.8% of its earnings as a dividend. BXP, Inc. pays out 4336.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but BXP, Inc.'s is not.

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than BXP, Inc. quarterly revenues of $871.5M. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s net income of $163M is higher than BXP, Inc.'s net income of -$116.8M. Notably, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.11x while BXP, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3,557.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is 2.00x versus 3.14x for BXP, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prologis, Inc. has a net margin of 12.25% compared to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s net margin of 37.1%. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.99% beat Prologis, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.93%.

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.79, signalling upside risk potential of 15.74%. On the other hand Prologis, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $131.30 which suggests that it could grow by 3.66%. Given that Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has higher upside potential than Prologis, Inc., analysts believe Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is more attractive than Prologis, Inc..

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.185, which suggesting that the stock is 18.526% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis, Inc. has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.751%.

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Prologis, Inc. offers a yield of 3.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pays 80.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis, Inc. pays out 95.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Prologis, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s net income of $163M is lower than Prologis, Inc.'s net income of $821.3M. Notably, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.11x while Prologis, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is 2.00x versus 13.85x for Prologis, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regency Centers Corp. has a net margin of 12.25% compared to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s net margin of 29.06%. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.99% beat Regency Centers Corp.'s return on equity of 6.08%.

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.79, signalling upside risk potential of 15.74%. On the other hand Regency Centers Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $79.70 which suggests that it could grow by 17.43%. Given that Regency Centers Corp. has higher upside potential than Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., analysts believe Regency Centers Corp. is more attractive than Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc..

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.185, which suggesting that the stock is 18.526% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regency Centers Corp. has a beta of 0.931, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.901%.

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Regency Centers Corp. offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pays 80.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Regency Centers Corp. pays out 128.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Regency Centers Corp.'s is not.

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Regency Centers Corp. quarterly revenues of $387.5M. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s net income of $163M is higher than Regency Centers Corp.'s net income of $112.6M. Notably, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.11x while Regency Centers Corp.'s PE ratio is 31.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is 2.00x versus 8.11x for Regency Centers Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simon Property Group, Inc. has a net margin of 12.25% compared to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s net margin of 43.88%. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.99% beat Simon Property Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 81.03%.

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.79, signalling upside risk potential of 15.74%. On the other hand Simon Property Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $193.45 which suggests that it could grow by 7.43%. Given that Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has higher upside potential than Simon Property Group, Inc., analysts believe Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is more attractive than Simon Property Group, Inc..

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.185, which suggesting that the stock is 18.526% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simon Property Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.642%.

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Simon Property Group, Inc. offers a yield of 4.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.15 per share. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pays 80.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Simon Property Group, Inc. pays out 107.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Simon Property Group, Inc.'s is not.

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Simon Property Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s net income of $163M is lower than Simon Property Group, Inc.'s net income of $702.7M. Notably, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.11x while Simon Property Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is 2.00x versus 9.55x for Simon Property Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.