HRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Beyond Meat has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of -58.52%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.54% beat Beyond Meat's return on equity of --.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.02, signalling upside risk potential of 9.63%. On the other hand Beyond Meat has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could grow by 20.8%. Given that Beyond Meat has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe Beyond Meat is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.217% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beyond Meat has a beta of 2.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.704%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Beyond Meat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Beyond Meat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hormel Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Beyond Meat quarterly revenues of $76.7M. Hormel Foods's net income of $170.6M is higher than Beyond Meat's net income of -$44.9M. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.32x while Beyond Meat's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.35x versus 0.46x for Beyond Meat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Mills has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of 12.92%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.54% beat General Mills's return on equity of 26.75%.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.02, signalling upside risk potential of 9.63%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $62.05 which suggests that it could grow by 13.85%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.217% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.047, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.326%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Hormel Foods's net income of $170.6M is lower than General Mills's net income of $625.6M. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.32x while General Mills's PE ratio is 11.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.35x versus 1.56x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pilgrims Pride has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of 6.63%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.54% beat Pilgrims Pride's return on equity of 32.03%.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.02, signalling upside risk potential of 9.63%. On the other hand Pilgrims Pride has an analysts' consensus of $48.26 which suggests that it could grow by 2.54%. Given that Hormel Foods has higher upside potential than Pilgrims Pride, analysts believe Hormel Foods is more attractive than Pilgrims Pride.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.217% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pilgrims Pride has a beta of 0.506, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.436%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Pilgrims Pride offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $6.30 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Pilgrims Pride pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hormel Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Pilgrims Pride quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Hormel Foods's net income of $170.6M is lower than Pilgrims Pride's net income of $296M. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.32x while Pilgrims Pride's PE ratio is 9.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.35x versus 0.62x for Pilgrims Pride. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tyson Foods has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of 0.05%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.54% beat Tyson Foods's return on equity of 4.96%.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.02, signalling upside risk potential of 9.63%. On the other hand Tyson Foods has an analysts' consensus of $66.03 which suggests that it could grow by 19.41%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.217% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.632, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.837%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Tyson Foods offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods pays out 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Tyson Foods quarterly revenues of $13.1B. Hormel Foods's net income of $170.6M is higher than Tyson Foods's net income of $7M. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.32x while Tyson Foods's PE ratio is 21.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.35x versus 0.37x for Tyson Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.