EIX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avista Corp. has a net margin of 36.87% compared to Edison International's net margin of 13.32%. Edison International's return on equity of 25% beat Avista Corp.'s return on equity of 7.29%.

Edison International has a consensus price target of $74.19, signalling upside risk potential of 1%. On the other hand Avista Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $40.67 which suggests that it could fall by -1.63%. Given that Edison International has higher upside potential than Avista Corp., analysts believe Edison International is more attractive than Avista Corp..

Edison International has a beta of 0.768, which suggesting that the stock is 23.176% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avista Corp. has a beta of 0.225, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.456%.

Edison International has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. Avista Corp. offers a yield of 4.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Edison International pays 29.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Avista Corp. pays out 82.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Edison International quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Avista Corp. quarterly revenues of $533M. Edison International's net income of $1.9B is higher than Avista Corp.'s net income of $71M. Notably, Edison International's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.35x while Avista Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Edison International is 1.46x versus 1.73x for Avista Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DTE Energy Co. has a net margin of 36.87% compared to Edison International's net margin of 8.7%. Edison International's return on equity of 25% beat DTE Energy Co.'s return on equity of 12.19%.

Edison International has a consensus price target of $74.19, signalling upside risk potential of 1%. On the other hand DTE Energy Co. has an analysts' consensus of $155.04 which suggests that it could grow by 4.73%. Given that DTE Energy Co. has higher upside potential than Edison International, analysts believe DTE Energy Co. is more attractive than Edison International.

Edison International has a beta of 0.768, which suggesting that the stock is 23.176% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DTE Energy Co. has a beta of 0.434, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.65%.

Edison International has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. DTE Energy Co. offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share. Edison International pays 29.09% of its earnings as a dividend. DTE Energy Co. pays out 62.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Edison International quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than DTE Energy Co. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Edison International's net income of $1.9B is higher than DTE Energy Co.'s net income of $369M. Notably, Edison International's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.35x while DTE Energy Co.'s PE ratio is 21.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Edison International is 1.46x versus 2.02x for DTE Energy Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Consolidated Edison, Inc. has a net margin of 36.87% compared to Edison International's net margin of 7.43%. Edison International's return on equity of 25% beat Consolidated Edison, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.58%.

Edison International has a consensus price target of $74.19, signalling upside risk potential of 1%. On the other hand Consolidated Edison, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $110.88 which suggests that it could fall by -3.95%. Given that Edison International has higher upside potential than Consolidated Edison, Inc., analysts believe Edison International is more attractive than Consolidated Edison, Inc..

Edison International has a beta of 0.768, which suggesting that the stock is 23.176% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Consolidated Edison, Inc. has a beta of 0.343, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.713%.

Edison International has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. Consolidated Edison, Inc. offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. Edison International pays 29.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays out 60.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Edison International quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Consolidated Edison, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4B. Edison International's net income of $1.9B is higher than Consolidated Edison, Inc.'s net income of $297M. Notably, Edison International's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.35x while Consolidated Edison, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Edison International is 1.46x versus 2.48x for Consolidated Edison, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSource, Inc. has a net margin of 36.87% compared to Edison International's net margin of 14.57%. Edison International's return on equity of 25% beat NiSource, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.1%.

Edison International has a consensus price target of $74.19, signalling upside risk potential of 1%. On the other hand NiSource, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $48.79 which suggests that it could grow by 2.73%. Given that NiSource, Inc. has higher upside potential than Edison International, analysts believe NiSource, Inc. is more attractive than Edison International.

Edison International has a beta of 0.768, which suggesting that the stock is 23.176% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSource, Inc. has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.706%.

Edison International has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. NiSource, Inc. offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Edison International pays 29.09% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSource, Inc. pays out 57.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Edison International quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than NiSource, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Edison International's net income of $1.9B is higher than NiSource, Inc.'s net income of $277.2M. Notably, Edison International's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.35x while NiSource, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Edison International is 1.46x versus 3.43x for NiSource, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.