CMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CenterPoint Energy has a net margin of 13.32% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 10.96%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.78% beat CenterPoint Energy's return on equity of 9.95%.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $73.74, signalling downside risk potential of -0.6%. On the other hand CenterPoint Energy has an analysts' consensus of $34.81 which suggests that it could fall by -3.97%. Given that CenterPoint Energy has more downside risk than CMS Energy, analysts believe CMS Energy is more attractive than CenterPoint Energy.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.07% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CenterPoint Energy has a beta of 0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.631%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. CenterPoint Energy offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. CenterPoint Energy pays out 51.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than CenterPoint Energy quarterly revenues of $2.3B. CMS Energy's net income of $265M is higher than CenterPoint Energy's net income of $248M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.34x while CenterPoint Energy's PE ratio is 22.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.94x versus 2.70x for CenterPoint Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DTE Energy has a net margin of 13.32% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 8.5%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.78% beat DTE Energy's return on equity of 12.39%.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $73.74, signalling downside risk potential of -0.6%. On the other hand DTE Energy has an analysts' consensus of $138.65 which suggests that it could grow by 1.53%. Given that DTE Energy has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe DTE Energy is more attractive than CMS Energy.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.07% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DTE Energy has a beta of 0.593, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.74%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. DTE Energy offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. DTE Energy pays out 57.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than DTE Energy quarterly revenues of $3.4B. CMS Energy's net income of $265M is lower than DTE Energy's net income of $292M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.34x while DTE Energy's PE ratio is 20.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.94x versus 2.27x for DTE Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextEra Energy has a net margin of 13.32% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 22.34%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.78% beat NextEra Energy's return on equity of 11.64%.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $73.74, signalling downside risk potential of -0.6%. On the other hand NextEra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $84.51 which suggests that it could grow by 19.96%. Given that NextEra Energy has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe NextEra Energy is more attractive than CMS Energy.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.07% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextEra Energy has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.762%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. NextEra Energy offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. NextEra Energy pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than NextEra Energy quarterly revenues of $5.4B. CMS Energy's net income of $265M is lower than NextEra Energy's net income of $1.2B. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.34x while NextEra Energy's PE ratio is 20.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.94x versus 5.86x for NextEra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSource has a net margin of 13.32% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 14.1%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.78% beat NiSource's return on equity of 7.49%.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $73.74, signalling downside risk potential of -0.6%. On the other hand NiSource has an analysts' consensus of $41.27 which suggests that it could grow by 3.37%. Given that NiSource has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe NiSource is more attractive than CMS Energy.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.07% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSource has a beta of 0.504, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.575%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. NiSource offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSource pays out 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than NiSource quarterly revenues of $1.6B. CMS Energy's net income of $265M is higher than NiSource's net income of $223.9M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.34x while NiSource's PE ratio is 24.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.94x versus 3.34x for NiSource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.