CLX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kenvue has a net margin of 11.15% compared to Clorox's net margin of 8%. Clorox's return on equity of 270.67% beat Kenvue's return on equity of 9.84%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $150.01, signalling upside risk potential of 11.08%. On the other hand Kenvue has an analysts' consensus of $24.27 which suggests that it could grow by 2.96%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Kenvue, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Kenvue.

Clorox has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kenvue has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Kenvue offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Kenvue pays out 150.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Kenvue quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Clorox's net income of $186M is lower than Kenvue's net income of $293M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.25x while Kenvue's PE ratio is 44.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.40x versus 2.93x for Kenvue. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 11.15% compared to Clorox's net margin of 19.06%. Clorox's return on equity of 270.67% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $150.01, signalling upside risk potential of 11.08%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $171.51 which suggests that it could grow by 7.7%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Clorox has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.603%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $19.8B. Clorox's net income of $186M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.25x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 25.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.40x versus 4.67x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Philip Morris International has a net margin of 11.15% compared to Clorox's net margin of 28.92%. Clorox's return on equity of 270.67% beat Philip Morris International's return on equity of --.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $150.01, signalling upside risk potential of 11.08%. On the other hand Philip Morris International has an analysts' consensus of $171.26 which suggests that it could fall by -1.62%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Clorox has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.144%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Philip Morris International offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Philip Morris International pays out 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Philip Morris International quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Clorox's net income of $186M is lower than Philip Morris International's net income of $2.7B. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.25x while Philip Morris International's PE ratio is 35.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.40x versus 7.06x for Philip Morris International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tyson Foods has a net margin of 11.15% compared to Clorox's net margin of 0.05%. Clorox's return on equity of 270.67% beat Tyson Foods's return on equity of 4.96%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $150.01, signalling upside risk potential of 11.08%. On the other hand Tyson Foods has an analysts' consensus of $66.03 which suggests that it could grow by 18.45%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Clorox.

Clorox has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.632, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.837%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Tyson Foods offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods pays out 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Tyson Foods quarterly revenues of $13.1B. Clorox's net income of $186M is higher than Tyson Foods's net income of $7M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.25x while Tyson Foods's PE ratio is 21.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.40x versus 0.37x for Tyson Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.