CLX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Church & Dwight has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Clorox's net margin of 11.96%. Clorox's return on equity of 174.43% beat Church & Dwight's return on equity of 14.06%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $164.11, signalling upside risk potential of 11.94%. On the other hand Church & Dwight has an analysts' consensus of $106.79 which suggests that it could fall by -2.13%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Clorox has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.569, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.12%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. Church & Dwight offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight pays out 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Church & Dwight quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Clorox's net income of $193M is higher than Church & Dwight's net income of $189.2M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.97x while Church & Dwight's PE ratio is 46.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.55x versus 4.40x for Church & Dwight. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Clorox's net margin of 14.94%. Clorox's return on equity of 174.43% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $164.11, signalling upside risk potential of 11.94%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $97.73 which suggests that it could grow by 5.34%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive.

Clorox has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.398, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.18%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Clorox's net income of $193M is lower than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.97x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 26.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.55x versus 3.80x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Clorox's net margin of 9.07%. Clorox's return on equity of 174.43% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $164.11, signalling upside risk potential of 11.94%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $144.73 which suggests that it could grow by 2.86%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Clorox has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.505%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Clorox's net income of $193M is lower than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.97x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 18.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.55x versus 2.36x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tyson Foods has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Clorox's net margin of 2.64%. Clorox's return on equity of 174.43% beat Tyson Foods's return on equity of 5.73%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $164.11, signalling upside risk potential of 11.94%. On the other hand Tyson Foods has an analysts' consensus of $67.27 which suggests that it could grow by 7.85%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Tyson Foods, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Tyson Foods.

Clorox has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.720, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.013%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. Tyson Foods offers a yield of 3.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods pays out 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Tyson Foods quarterly revenues of $13.6B. Clorox's net income of $193M is lower than Tyson Foods's net income of $359M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.97x while Tyson Foods's PE ratio is 21.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.55x versus 0.42x for Tyson Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.