Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Sell
15
CA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$25.00
Seasonality move
:
-1.24%
Day range:
$24.96 - $24.96
52-week range:
$23.54 - $25.85
Dividend yield:
2.9%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
6
Avg. volume:
2.5K
1-year change:
-2%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BSMU
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BSMV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PVI
Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
|
$24.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 2.9% | -- |
|
BSMU
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF
|
$22.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 2.84% | -- |
|
BSMV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF
|
$21.12 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 2.93% | -- |
|
PVI
Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF
|
$24.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 2.19% | -- |
|
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
|
$24.21 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 3.36% | -- |
|
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
|
$25.71 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 3.33% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 1.146 | -- | -- |
|
BSMU
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.789 | -- | -- |
|
BSMV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.835 | -- | -- |
|
PVI
Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF
|
-- | 0.006 | -- | -- |
|
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 1.446 | -- | -- |
|
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 1.008 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BSMU
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BSMV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PVI
Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CA or BSMU?
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- BSMUInvesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CA or BSMU?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 BSMUInvesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is CA or BSMU More Risky?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 1.181, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.099%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CA or BSMU?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CA or BSMU?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- BSMUInvesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CA or BSMV?
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- BSMVInvesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CA or BSMV?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 BSMVInvesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is CA or BSMV More Risky?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CA or BSMV?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CA or BSMV?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- BSMVInvesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CA or PVI?
Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- PVIInvesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CA or PVI?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF, analysts believe Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 PVIInvesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is CA or PVI More Risky?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF has a beta of 0.001, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.937%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CA or PVI?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CA or PVI?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- PVIInvesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CA or PWZ?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CA or PWZ?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is CA or PWZ More Risky?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.233%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CA or PWZ?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CA or PWZ?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CA or SCMB?
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Schwab Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- SCMBSchwab Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CA or SCMB?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schwab Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Schwab Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than Schwab Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 SCMBSchwab Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is CA or SCMB More Risky?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schwab Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CA or SCMB?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Schwab Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schwab Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CA or SCMB?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schwab Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Schwab Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Schwab Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Schwab Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- SCMBSchwab Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4
Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.
