BXP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Host Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of 7.07% compared to BXP's net margin of 15.56%. BXP's return on equity of -0.06% beat Host Hotels & Resorts's return on equity of 9.85%.

BXP has a consensus price target of $77.11, signalling upside risk potential of 12.03%. On the other hand Host Hotels & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $17.89 which suggests that it could grow by 10.36%. Given that BXP has higher upside potential than Host Hotels & Resorts, analysts believe BXP is more attractive than Host Hotels & Resorts.

BXP has a beta of 1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 15.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Host Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.519%.

BXP has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.7%. Host Hotels & Resorts offers a yield of 5.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. BXP pays 4833.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts pays out 105.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BXP quarterly revenues are $865.2M, which are smaller than Host Hotels & Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.6B. BXP's net income of $61.2M is lower than Host Hotels & Resorts's net income of $248M. Notably, BXP's price-to-earnings ratio is 637.30x while Host Hotels & Resorts's PE ratio is 16.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BXP is 3.17x versus 1.96x for Host Hotels & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prologis has a net margin of 7.07% compared to BXP's net margin of 27.71%. BXP's return on equity of -0.06% beat Prologis's return on equity of 6.45%.

BXP has a consensus price target of $77.11, signalling upside risk potential of 12.03%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $117.15 which suggests that it could grow by 8.45%. Given that BXP has higher upside potential than Prologis, analysts believe BXP is more attractive than Prologis.

BXP has a beta of 1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 15.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.232, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.179%.

BXP has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.7%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. BXP pays 4833.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 95.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but BXP's is not.

BXP quarterly revenues are $865.2M, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2.1B. BXP's net income of $61.2M is lower than Prologis's net income of $593M. Notably, BXP's price-to-earnings ratio is 637.30x while Prologis's PE ratio is 26.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BXP is 3.17x versus 12.29x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SL Green Realty has a net margin of 7.07% compared to BXP's net margin of -6.33%. BXP's return on equity of -0.06% beat SL Green Realty's return on equity of -0.08%.

BXP has a consensus price target of $77.11, signalling upside risk potential of 12.03%. On the other hand SL Green Realty has an analysts' consensus of $63.22 which suggests that it could grow by 2.19%. Given that BXP has higher upside potential than SL Green Realty, analysts believe BXP is more attractive than SL Green Realty.

BXP has a beta of 1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 15.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.640, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.039%.

BXP has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.7%. SL Green Realty offers a yield of 4.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. BXP pays 4833.73% of its earnings as a dividend. SL Green Realty pays out 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BXP quarterly revenues are $865.2M, which are larger than SL Green Realty quarterly revenues of $239.8M. BXP's net income of $61.2M is higher than SL Green Realty's net income of -$15.2M. Notably, BXP's price-to-earnings ratio is 637.30x while SL Green Realty's PE ratio is 654.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BXP is 3.17x versus 4.50x for SL Green Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ventas has a net margin of 7.07% compared to BXP's net margin of 3.45%. BXP's return on equity of -0.06% beat Ventas's return on equity of 1.36%.

BXP has a consensus price target of $77.11, signalling upside risk potential of 12.03%. On the other hand Ventas has an analysts' consensus of $75.67 which suggests that it could grow by 20.24%. Given that Ventas has higher upside potential than BXP, analysts believe Ventas is more attractive than BXP.

BXP has a beta of 1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 15.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ventas has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.226%.

BXP has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.7%. Ventas offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. BXP pays 4833.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Ventas pays out 912.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BXP quarterly revenues are $865.2M, which are smaller than Ventas quarterly revenues of $1.4B. BXP's net income of $61.2M is higher than Ventas's net income of $46.9M. Notably, BXP's price-to-earnings ratio is 637.30x while Ventas's PE ratio is 190.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BXP is 3.17x versus 5.28x for Ventas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.