AMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. has a net margin of 27.9% compared to Applied Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 12.68%. Applied Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.26% beat Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.35%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $258.1250, signalling downside risk potential of -0.34%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $282.82 which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, Inc., analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. is more attractive than Applied Materials, Inc..

Applied Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.671, which suggesting that the stock is 67.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. has a beta of 1.928, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.82%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Materials, Inc. pays 20.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Applied Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Applied Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.99x while Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s PE ratio is 106.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials, Inc. is 7.41x versus 10.96x for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel Corp. has a net margin of 27.9% compared to Applied Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 31.28%. Applied Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.26% beat Intel Corp.'s return on equity of 0.19%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $258.1250, signalling downside risk potential of -0.34%. On the other hand Intel Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $38.14 which suggests that it could grow by 4.93%. Given that Intel Corp. has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, Inc., analysts believe Intel Corp. is more attractive than Applied Materials, Inc..

Applied Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.671, which suggesting that the stock is 67.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel Corp. has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.279%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Intel Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Applied Materials, Inc. pays 20.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel Corp. pays out 8.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than Intel Corp. quarterly revenues of $13.7B. Applied Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B is lower than Intel Corp.'s net income of $4.3B. Notably, Applied Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.99x while Intel Corp.'s PE ratio is 3,429.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials, Inc. is 7.41x versus 2.99x for Intel Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA Corp. has a net margin of 27.9% compared to Applied Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 34.93%. Applied Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.26% beat KLA Corp.'s return on equity of 101.72%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $258.1250, signalling downside risk potential of -0.34%. On the other hand KLA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1,320.96 which suggests that it could grow by 4.12%. Given that KLA Corp. has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, Inc., analysts believe KLA Corp. is more attractive than Applied Materials, Inc..

Applied Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.671, which suggesting that the stock is 67.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA Corp. has a beta of 1.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.006%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. KLA Corp. offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Applied Materials, Inc. pays 20.55% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp. pays out 22.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than KLA Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Applied Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B is higher than KLA Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Applied Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.99x while KLA Corp.'s PE ratio is 39.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials, Inc. is 7.41x versus 13.49x for KLA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 27.9% compared to Applied Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 91.65%. Applied Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.26% beat Marvell Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.3%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $258.1250, signalling downside risk potential of -0.34%. On the other hand Marvell Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $116.58 which suggests that it could grow by 32.96%. Given that Marvell Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, Inc., analysts believe Marvell Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Applied Materials, Inc..

Applied Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.671, which suggesting that the stock is 67.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.932, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.174%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Marvell Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Applied Materials, Inc. pays 20.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology, Inc. pays out 23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Marvell Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Applied Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B is lower than Marvell Technology, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Applied Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.99x while Marvell Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials, Inc. is 7.41x versus 9.82x for Marvell Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.