Financhill
Sell
48

AMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$181.5200
Seasonality move :
9.99%
Day range:
$178.2900 - $181.5300
52-week range:
$158.9580 - $255.8900
Dividend yield:
0.84%
P/E ratio:
21.01x
P/S ratio:
5.55x
P/B ratio:
7.75x
Volume:
5M
Avg. volume:
6.1M
1-year change:
-2.51%
Market cap:
$147.2B
Revenue:
$27.2B
EPS (TTM):
$8.61

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AMAT
Applied Materials
$7.2B $2.30 6.9% -4% $210.4182
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
$7.5B $1.09 29.77% 1239.77% $149.01
INTC
Intel
$13.8B $0.12 -3.48% -81.02% $21.97
KLAC
KLA
$2.9B $7.76 27.43% 82.11% $822.51
MU
Micron Technology
$8.7B $1.77 36.19% 104.37% $130.35
NVDA
NVIDIA
$38.1B $0.85 72.49% 71.57% $172.08
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AMAT
Applied Materials
$180.8900 $210.4182 $147.2B 21.01x $0.40 0.84% 5.55x
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
$111.72 $149.01 $181B 112.85x $0.00 0% 7.09x
INTC
Intel
$22.48 $21.97 $97.3B 95.83x $0.13 2.22% 1.81x
KLAC
KLA
$750.55 $822.51 $99.7B 31.56x $1.70 0.81% 9.34x
MU
Micron Technology
$91.68 $130.35 $102.1B 26.42x $0.12 0.5% 3.56x
NVDA
NVIDIA
$131.14 $172.08 $3.2T 51.61x $0.01 0.03% 28.79x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AMAT
Applied Materials
24.78% 1.922 4.43% 1.75x
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
2.9% 1.958 0.88% 1.66x
INTC
Intel
33.5% 3.130 54.02% 0.72x
KLAC
KLA
62.14% 1.525 7.02% 1.51x
MU
Micron Technology
19.46% 1.921 10.36% 1.67x
NVDA
NVIDIA
11.38% 2.251 0.26% 3.41x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AMAT
Applied Materials
$3.3B $2B 30.15% 39.95% 27.84% $2.2B
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
$3.9B $1.1B 2.8% 2.9% 11.86% $1.1B
INTC
Intel
$5.6B $469M -11.64% -17.02% 5.84% -$2.7B
KLAC
KLA
$1.9B $1.2B 33.2% 96.34% 34.05% $757.2M
MU
Micron Technology
$3.3B $2.2B 6.91% 8.71% 26.07% $38M
NVDA
NVIDIA
$26.2B $21.9B 106.73% 126.43% 63.79% $16.8B

Applied Materials vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or AMD?

    Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 6.29%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    47.34% $2.09 $25.3B
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices
    50.69% $0.29 $59.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or AMD?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $210.4182, signalling upside risk potential of 16.32%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $149.01 which suggests that it could grow by 33.38%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Applied Materials.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 11 1
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices
    27 15 1
  • Is AMAT or AMD More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.527, which suggesting that the stock is 52.741% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.655, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.485%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or AMD?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or AMD?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.01x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 112.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.55x versus 7.09x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.55x 21.01x $7B $1.7B
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices
    7.09x 112.85x $7.7B $482M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or INTC?

    Intel has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of -0.88%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    47.34% $2.09 $25.3B
    INTC
    Intel
    39.16% -$0.03 $155B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or INTC?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $210.4182, signalling upside risk potential of 16.32%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.97 which suggests that it could fall by -2.29%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Intel.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 11 1
    INTC
    Intel
    3 37 1
  • Is AMAT or INTC More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.527, which suggesting that the stock is 52.741% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.1%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or INTC?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Intel offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or INTC?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.01x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.55x versus 1.81x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.55x 21.01x $7B $1.7B
    INTC
    Intel
    1.81x 95.83x $14.3B -$126M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or KLAC?

    KLA has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 26.8%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    47.34% $2.09 $25.3B
    KLAC
    KLA
    60.3% $6.16 $9.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or KLAC?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $210.4182, signalling upside risk potential of 16.32%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $822.51 which suggests that it could grow by 9.59%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than KLA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 11 1
    KLAC
    KLA
    12 10 0
  • Is AMAT or KLAC More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.527, which suggesting that the stock is 52.741% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.693%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or KLAC?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. KLA offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or KLAC?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B is higher than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.01x while KLA's PE ratio is 31.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.55x versus 9.34x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.55x 21.01x $7B $1.7B
    KLAC
    KLA
    9.34x 31.56x $3.1B $824.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or MU?

    Micron Technology has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 21.47%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 8.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    47.34% $2.09 $25.3B
    MU
    Micron Technology
    38.44% $1.67 $58.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or MU?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $210.4182, signalling upside risk potential of 16.32%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $130.35 which suggests that it could grow by 42.18%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 11 1
    MU
    Micron Technology
    25 5 0
  • Is AMAT or MU More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.527, which suggesting that the stock is 52.741% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.179, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.944%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or MU?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or MU?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.7B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.01x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 26.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.55x versus 3.56x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.55x 21.01x $7B $1.7B
    MU
    Micron Technology
    3.56x 26.42x $8.7B $1.9B
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or NVDA?

    NVIDIA has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 55.04%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    47.34% $2.09 $25.3B
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    74.56% $0.78 $74.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or NVDA?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $210.4182, signalling upside risk potential of 16.32%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.08 which suggests that it could grow by 31.22%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Applied Materials.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 11 1
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    47 4 0
  • Is AMAT or NVDA More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.527, which suggesting that the stock is 52.741% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.622, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.23%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or NVDA?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or NVDA?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.01x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 51.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.55x versus 28.79x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.55x 21.01x $7B $1.7B
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    28.79x 51.61x $35.1B $19.3B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

What Will Palantir Stock Be Worth in 2030?
What Will Palantir Stock Be Worth in 2030?

Palantir Technologies (NYSE: PLTR) has emerged from a growth slowdown…

Is Rollins Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Is Rollins Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?

Pest control giant Rollins (NYSE:ROL) is the parent company of…

Why Did Bill Ackman Buy Uber?
Why Did Bill Ackman Buy Uber?

In early 2025, billionaire investor Bill Ackman, CEO of Pershing…

Stock Ideas

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 110x

Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
58
UPST alert for Feb 13

Upstart Holdings [UPST] is down 2.78% over the past day.

Buy
79
CFLT alert for Feb 13

Confluent [CFLT] is down 3.64% over the past day.

Buy
52
BL alert for Feb 13

BlackLine [BL] is up 0.34% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock