AMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 6.29%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $202.7746, signalling upside risk potential of 41.23%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $137.74 which suggests that it could grow by 52.39%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Applied Materials.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.609, which suggesting that the stock is 60.887% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.664%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.77x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 91.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.31x versus 5.74x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of -0.88%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $202.7746, signalling upside risk potential of 41.23%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.17 which suggests that it could grow by 7.67%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Intel.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.609, which suggesting that the stock is 60.887% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.94%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Intel offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.77x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.31x versus 1.66x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 26.8%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $202.7746, signalling upside risk potential of 41.23%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $794.97 which suggests that it could grow by 20.98%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than KLA.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.609, which suggesting that the stock is 60.887% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.998%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. KLA offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.77x while KLA's PE ratio is 27.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.31x versus 8.18x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 11.02%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $202.7746, signalling upside risk potential of 41.23%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $103.80 which suggests that it could grow by 93.05%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.609, which suggesting that the stock is 60.887% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.781, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.133%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.77x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.31x versus 8.07x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.