AMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel Corp. has a net margin of 27.9% compared to Applied Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 31.28%. Applied Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.26% beat Intel Corp.'s return on equity of 0.19%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $246.7188, signalling downside risk potential of -8.16%. On the other hand Intel Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $37.27 which suggests that it could fall by -14.84%. Given that Intel Corp. has more downside risk than Applied Materials, Inc., analysts believe Applied Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Intel Corp..

Applied Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.671, which suggesting that the stock is 67.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel Corp. has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.279%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Intel Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Applied Materials, Inc. pays 20.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel Corp. pays out 8.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than Intel Corp. quarterly revenues of $13.7B. Applied Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B is lower than Intel Corp.'s net income of $4.3B. Notably, Applied Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.96x while Intel Corp.'s PE ratio is 4,128.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials, Inc. is 7.65x versus 3.60x for Intel Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA Corp. has a net margin of 27.9% compared to Applied Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 34.93%. Applied Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.26% beat KLA Corp.'s return on equity of 101.72%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $246.7188, signalling downside risk potential of -8.16%. On the other hand KLA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1,289.58 which suggests that it could grow by 6.42%. Given that KLA Corp. has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, Inc., analysts believe KLA Corp. is more attractive than Applied Materials, Inc..

Applied Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.671, which suggesting that the stock is 67.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA Corp. has a beta of 1.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.006%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. KLA Corp. offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Applied Materials, Inc. pays 20.55% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp. pays out 22.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than KLA Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Applied Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B is higher than KLA Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Applied Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.96x while KLA Corp.'s PE ratio is 38.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials, Inc. is 7.65x versus 12.88x for KLA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 27.9% compared to Applied Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 9.71%. Applied Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.26% beat Marvell Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.76%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $246.7188, signalling downside risk potential of -8.16%. On the other hand Marvell Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $113.38 which suggests that it could grow by 13.16%. Given that Marvell Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, Inc., analysts believe Marvell Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Applied Materials, Inc..

Applied Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.671, which suggesting that the stock is 67.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.932, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.174%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Marvell Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Applied Materials, Inc. pays 20.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology, Inc. pays out 23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Marvell Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Applied Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B is lower than Marvell Technology, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Applied Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.96x while Marvell Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials, Inc. is 7.65x versus 12.09x for Marvell Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 27.9% compared to Applied Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 28.29%. Applied Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.26% beat Micron Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.39%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $246.7188, signalling downside risk potential of -8.16%. On the other hand Micron Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $224.11 which suggests that it could fall by -4.35%. Given that Applied Materials, Inc. has more downside risk than Micron Technology, Inc., analysts believe Micron Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Applied Materials, Inc..

Applied Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.671, which suggesting that the stock is 67.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.523%.

Applied Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Micron Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Applied Materials, Inc. pays 20.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc. pays out 6.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than Micron Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11.3B. Applied Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B is lower than Micron Technology, Inc.'s net income of $3.2B. Notably, Applied Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.96x while Micron Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials, Inc. is 7.65x versus 7.05x for Micron Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.