ALL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Allstate's net margin of 11.42%. Allstate's return on equity of 23.5% beat The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.63%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $223.18, signalling upside risk potential of 15.3%. On the other hand The Hartford Financial Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $129.29 which suggests that it could grow by 18.11%. Given that The Hartford Financial Services Group has higher upside potential than Allstate, analysts believe The Hartford Financial Services Group is more attractive than Allstate.

Allstate has a beta of 0.504, which suggesting that the stock is 49.607% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.912%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. The Hartford Financial Services Group offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Allstate pays -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays out 21.93% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Financial Services Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.6B, which are larger than The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Allstate's net income of $1.2B is higher than The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $767M. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.54x while The Hartford Financial Services Group's PE ratio is 10.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.82x versus 1.27x for The Hartford Financial Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Allstate's net margin of 11.84%. Allstate's return on equity of 23.5% beat Progressive's return on equity of 36.88%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $223.18, signalling upside risk potential of 15.3%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $276.5625 which suggests that it could grow by 15.25%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Progressive.

Allstate has a beta of 0.504, which suggesting that the stock is 49.607% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.988%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. Progressive offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Allstate pays -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.6B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $19.7B. Allstate's net income of $1.2B is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.3B. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.54x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.82x versus 1.96x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Allstate's net margin of 10.59%. Allstate's return on equity of 23.5% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 18.55%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $223.18, signalling upside risk potential of 15.3%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $264.72 which suggests that it could grow by 9.95%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

Allstate has a beta of 0.504, which suggesting that the stock is 49.607% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.332%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Allstate pays -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 30.36% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.6B, which are larger than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Allstate's net income of $1.2B is lower than The Travelers Companies's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.54x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 12.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.82x versus 1.23x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Allstate's net margin of 10.83%. Allstate's return on equity of 23.5% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.53%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $223.18, signalling upside risk potential of 15.3%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $64.13 which suggests that it could grow by 9.5%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than WR Berkley.

Allstate has a beta of 0.504, which suggesting that the stock is 49.607% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.058%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Allstate pays -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 36.3% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.6B, which are larger than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Allstate's net income of $1.2B is higher than WR Berkley's net income of $365.6M. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.54x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 15.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.82x versus 1.80x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.