Financhill
Sell
41

AFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$109.28
Seasonality move :
3.96%
Day range:
$109.23 - $110.75
52-week range:
$96.95 - $115.84
Dividend yield:
2.12%
P/E ratio:
14.24x
P/S ratio:
3.35x
P/B ratio:
2.00x
Volume:
1.7M
Avg. volume:
2.2M
1-year change:
5.47%
Market cap:
$57.3B
Revenue:
$18.9B
EPS (TTM):
$7.67

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
$4.4B $1.70 -17.56% -50.37% $111.31
ALL
The Allstate Corp.
$17.2B $9.14 4.41% 24.14% $235.71
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
$80.1M $0.58 8.14% -15.48% $49.33
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
$1.5B $3.44 4.49% 13.74% $168.30
MET
MetLife, Inc.
$31.2B $2.36 2.44% 73.19% $92.47
UNM
Unum Group
$3.3B $2.11 1.63% 10.32% $94.77
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
$109.24 $111.31 $57.3B 14.24x $0.58 2.12% 3.35x
ALL
The Allstate Corp.
$212.21 $235.71 $55.5B 6.87x $1.00 1.89% 0.85x
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
$37.44 $49.33 $708.5M 14.33x $1.39 4.17% 2.31x
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
$141.95 $168.30 $11.3B 10.28x $0.27 0.76% 2.00x
MET
MetLife, Inc.
$79.41 $92.47 $52.3B 14.95x $0.57 2.83% 0.75x
UNM
Unum Group
$80.29 $94.77 $13.4B 15.64x $0.46 2.19% 1.09x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
23.24% -0.173 14.79% 0.00x
ALL
The Allstate Corp.
22.73% -0.228 13.89% 0.00x
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
-- -0.326 -- 0.00x
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
32.3% -0.071 23.64% 0.00x
MET
MetLife, Inc.
41.14% 0.913 37% 0.00x
UNM
Unum Group
25.56% 0.231 28.5% 0.00x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
-- $2.1B 11.98% 15.66% 42.07% $1.3B
ALL
The Allstate Corp.
-- $4.2B 26.63% 35.98% 27.93% $3.2B
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
-- $17.5M 18.17% 18.18% 21.33% $9.8M
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
-- $521.2M 14.28% 21.72% 31.53% $208.7M
MET
MetLife, Inc.
-- $1.5B 7.96% 13.43% 6.97% $3.6B
UNM
Unum Group
-- $107.6M 6.18% 8.25% 1.62% -$402.6M

Aflac, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or ALL?

    The Allstate Corp. has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 21.7%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat The Allstate Corp.'s return on equity of 35.98%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    ALL
    The Allstate Corp.
    -- $13.95 $35.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or ALL?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.31, signalling upside risk potential of 1.89%. On the other hand The Allstate Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $235.71 which suggests that it could grow by 11.08%. Given that The Allstate Corp. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe The Allstate Corp. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    ALL
    The Allstate Corp.
    12 7 0
  • Is AFL or ALL More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.669, which suggesting that the stock is 33.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Allstate Corp. has a beta of 0.243, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.661%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or ALL?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. The Allstate Corp. offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. The Allstate Corp. pays out 21.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or ALL?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than The Allstate Corp. quarterly revenues of $17.3B. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is lower than The Allstate Corp.'s net income of $3.7B. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.24x while The Allstate Corp.'s PE ratio is 6.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.35x versus 0.85x for The Allstate Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.35x 14.24x $4.7B $1.6B
    ALL
    The Allstate Corp.
    0.85x 6.87x $17.3B $3.7B
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or AMSF?

    AMERISAFE, Inc. has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 16.86%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat AMERISAFE, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.18%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    AMSF
    AMERISAFE, Inc.
    -- $0.72 $274.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or AMSF?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.31, signalling upside risk potential of 1.89%. On the other hand AMERISAFE, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $49.33 which suggests that it could grow by 31.77%. Given that AMERISAFE, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe AMERISAFE, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    AMSF
    AMERISAFE, Inc.
    0 2 0
  • Is AFL or AMSF More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.669, which suggesting that the stock is 33.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMERISAFE, Inc. has a beta of 0.361, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.886%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or AMSF?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. AMERISAFE, Inc. offers a yield of 4.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.39 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. AMERISAFE, Inc. pays out 51.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or AMSF?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than AMERISAFE, Inc. quarterly revenues of $82M. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than AMERISAFE, Inc.'s net income of $13.8M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.24x while AMERISAFE, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.35x versus 2.31x for AMERISAFE, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.35x 14.24x $4.7B $1.6B
    AMSF
    AMERISAFE, Inc.
    2.31x 14.33x $82M $13.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or GL?

    Globe Life, Inc. has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 25.63%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat Globe Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.72%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    GL
    Globe Life, Inc.
    -- $4.73 $8.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or GL?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.31, signalling upside risk potential of 1.89%. On the other hand Globe Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $168.30 which suggests that it could grow by 18.56%. Given that Globe Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe Globe Life, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    GL
    Globe Life, Inc.
    4 3 0
  • Is AFL or GL More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.669, which suggesting that the stock is 33.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.478, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.234%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or GL?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Globe Life, Inc. offers a yield of 0.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life, Inc. pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or GL?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Globe Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than Globe Life, Inc.'s net income of $387.8M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.24x while Globe Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.35x versus 2.00x for Globe Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.35x 14.24x $4.7B $1.6B
    GL
    Globe Life, Inc.
    2.00x 10.28x $1.5B $387.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or MET?

    MetLife, Inc. has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 5.2%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    MET
    MetLife, Inc.
    -- $1.22 $49.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or MET?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.31, signalling upside risk potential of 1.89%. On the other hand MetLife, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $92.47 which suggests that it could grow by 16.44%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    MET
    MetLife, Inc.
    8 6 0
  • Is AFL or MET More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.669, which suggesting that the stock is 33.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.764, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.611%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or MET?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. MetLife, Inc. offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife, Inc. pays out 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or MET?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues of $17.4B. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.24x while MetLife, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.35x versus 0.75x for MetLife, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.35x 14.24x $4.7B $1.6B
    MET
    MetLife, Inc.
    0.75x 14.95x $17.4B $902M
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or UNM?

    Unum Group has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 1.18%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 8.25%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    UNM
    Unum Group
    -- $0.23 $14.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or UNM?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.31, signalling upside risk potential of 1.89%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.77 which suggests that it could grow by 18.03%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    UNM
    Unum Group
    7 4 0
  • Is AFL or UNM More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.669, which suggesting that the stock is 33.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.200, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.961%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or UNM?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or UNM?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than Unum Group's net income of $39.7M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.24x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 15.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.35x versus 1.09x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.35x 14.24x $4.7B $1.6B
    UNM
    Unum Group
    1.09x 15.64x $3.4B $39.7M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will The Magnificent 7 Stocks Go Up This Year?
Will The Magnificent 7 Stocks Go Up This Year?

2025 was another banner year for the Magnificent Seven stocks,…

Why Did Planet Labs Stock Rally So Much?
Why Did Planet Labs Stock Rally So Much?

Satellite imaging startup Planet Labs (NYSE:PL), after years of disappointing…

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?

In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x

Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Alerts

Buy
100
ATGL alert for Jan 10

Alpha Technology Group Ltd. [ATGL] is up 47.05% over the past day.

Buy
71
NAIL alert for Jan 10

Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shs [NAIL] is up 18.52% over the past day.

Buy
54
LGIH alert for Jan 10

LGI Homes, Inc. [LGIH] is up 13.81% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock