Financhill
Sell
41

AFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$109.20
Seasonality move :
4.81%
Day range:
$109.01 - $110.14
52-week range:
$96.95 - $115.84
Dividend yield:
2.12%
P/E ratio:
14.24x
P/S ratio:
3.35x
P/B ratio:
2.00x
Volume:
2.2M
Avg. volume:
2.2M
1-year change:
2.1%
Market cap:
$57.3B
Revenue:
$18.9B
EPS (TTM):
$7.67

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
$4.5B $1.78 -18.02% -50.32% $111.08
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
$78.3M $0.56 8.14% -15.48% $49.33
CNO
CNO Financial Group, Inc.
$973.5M $0.92 -9.78% -23.02% $43.75
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
$1.5B $4.54 4.49% 13.83% $166.70
TRUP
Trupanion, Inc.
$361.6M $0.89 10.94% 2572.67% $54.75
UNM
Unum Group
$3.3B $2.15 1.58% 10.25% $93.46
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
$109.24 $111.08 $57.3B 14.24x $0.58 2.12% 3.35x
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
$39.13 $49.33 $740.5M 14.98x $1.39 3.94% 2.42x
CNO
CNO Financial Group, Inc.
$40.29 $43.75 $3.8B 14.09x $0.17 1.64% 0.92x
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
$130.82 $166.70 $10.4B 9.48x $0.27 0.8% 1.84x
TRUP
Trupanion, Inc.
$37.03 $54.75 $1.6B 103.90x $0.00 0% 1.14x
UNM
Unum Group
$73.34 $93.46 $12.3B 14.29x $0.46 2.4% 0.99x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
23.24% 0.131 14.79% 0.00x
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
-- -0.137 -- 0.00x
CNO
CNO Financial Group, Inc.
60.81% 0.392 106.88% 0.00x
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
32.3% 0.007 23.64% 0.00x
TRUP
Trupanion, Inc.
23.71% 1.904 6.13% 0.00x
UNM
Unum Group
25.56% 0.392 28.5% 0.00x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
-- $2.1B 11.98% 15.66% 42.07% $1.3B
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
-- $17.5M 18.17% 18.18% 21.33% $9.8M
CNO
CNO Financial Group, Inc.
-- $189.5M 4.29% 11.47% 3.01% $197.8M
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
-- $521.2M 14.28% 21.72% 31.53% $208.7M
TRUP
Trupanion, Inc.
-- $5.9M 3.34% 4.54% 1.8% $23.9M
UNM
Unum Group
-- $107.6M 6.18% 8.25% 1.62% -$402.6M

Aflac, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or AMSF?

    AMERISAFE, Inc. has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 16.86%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat AMERISAFE, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.18%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    AMSF
    AMERISAFE, Inc.
    -- $0.72 $274.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or AMSF?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.08, signalling upside risk potential of 1.69%. On the other hand AMERISAFE, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $49.33 which suggests that it could grow by 26.08%. Given that AMERISAFE, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe AMERISAFE, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 1
    AMSF
    AMERISAFE, Inc.
    0 2 0
  • Is AFL or AMSF More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMERISAFE, Inc. has a beta of 0.368, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.16%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or AMSF?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. AMERISAFE, Inc. offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.39 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. AMERISAFE, Inc. pays out 51.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or AMSF?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than AMERISAFE, Inc. quarterly revenues of $82M. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than AMERISAFE, Inc.'s net income of $13.8M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.24x while AMERISAFE, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.35x versus 2.42x for AMERISAFE, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.35x 14.24x $4.7B $1.6B
    AMSF
    AMERISAFE, Inc.
    2.42x 14.98x $82M $13.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or CNO?

    CNO Financial Group, Inc. has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 1.92%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat CNO Financial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.47%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    CNO
    CNO Financial Group, Inc.
    -- $0.23 $6.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or CNO?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.08, signalling upside risk potential of 1.69%. On the other hand CNO Financial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $43.75 which suggests that it could grow by 8.59%. Given that CNO Financial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe CNO Financial Group, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 1
    CNO
    CNO Financial Group, Inc.
    0 3 1
  • Is AFL or CNO More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNO Financial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.861, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.943%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or CNO?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. CNO Financial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. CNO Financial Group, Inc. pays out 16.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or CNO?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than CNO Financial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than CNO Financial Group, Inc.'s net income of $23.1M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.24x while CNO Financial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.35x versus 0.92x for CNO Financial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.35x 14.24x $4.7B $1.6B
    CNO
    CNO Financial Group, Inc.
    0.92x 14.09x $1.2B $23.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or GL?

    Globe Life, Inc. has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 25.63%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat Globe Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.72%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    GL
    Globe Life, Inc.
    -- $4.73 $8.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or GL?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.08, signalling upside risk potential of 1.69%. On the other hand Globe Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $166.70 which suggests that it could grow by 27.43%. Given that Globe Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe Globe Life, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 1
    GL
    Globe Life, Inc.
    5 2 0
  • Is AFL or GL More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.927%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or GL?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Globe Life, Inc. offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life, Inc. pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or GL?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Globe Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than Globe Life, Inc.'s net income of $387.8M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.24x while Globe Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.35x versus 1.84x for Globe Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.35x 14.24x $4.7B $1.6B
    GL
    Globe Life, Inc.
    1.84x 9.48x $1.5B $387.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or TRUP?

    Trupanion, Inc. has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 1.6%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat Trupanion, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.54%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    TRUP
    Trupanion, Inc.
    -- $0.13 $483.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or TRUP?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.08, signalling upside risk potential of 1.69%. On the other hand Trupanion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $54.75 which suggests that it could grow by 47.85%. Given that Trupanion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe Trupanion, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 1
    TRUP
    Trupanion, Inc.
    2 3 0
  • Is AFL or TRUP More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion, Inc. has a beta of 1.624, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.431%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or TRUP?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Trupanion, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or TRUP?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Trupanion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $366.9M. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than Trupanion, Inc.'s net income of $5.9M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.24x while Trupanion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 103.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.35x versus 1.14x for Trupanion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.35x 14.24x $4.7B $1.6B
    TRUP
    Trupanion, Inc.
    1.14x 103.90x $366.9M $5.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or UNM?

    Unum Group has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 1.18%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 8.25%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    UNM
    Unum Group
    -- $0.23 $14.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or UNM?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.08, signalling upside risk potential of 1.69%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $93.46 which suggests that it could grow by 27.44%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 1
    UNM
    Unum Group
    7 4 0
  • Is AFL or UNM More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.200, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.988%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or UNM?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or UNM?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than Unum Group's net income of $39.7M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.24x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 14.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.35x versus 0.99x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.35x 14.24x $4.7B $1.6B
    UNM
    Unum Group
    0.99x 14.29x $3.4B $39.7M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…

How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.

Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 0.06% over the past day.

Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5

Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 2.97% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock