Financhill
Sell
44

AFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$113.19
Seasonality move :
6.82%
Day range:
$112.58 - $114.03
52-week range:
$96.95 - $119.32
Dividend yield:
2.06%
P/E ratio:
16.55x
P/S ratio:
3.55x
P/B ratio:
2.00x
Volume:
1.9M
Avg. volume:
2.4M
1-year change:
7.71%
Market cap:
$59.1B
Revenue:
$17.2B
EPS (TTM):
$6.89

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
$4.4B $1.69 26.93% 3332.13% $113.00
ALL
The Allstate Corp.
$17.3B $9.86 5.18% 232.75% $239.95
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
$80.3M $0.60 10.39% 22% $45.33
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
$1.5B $3.44 5.11% 16.77% $172.00
MET
MetLife, Inc.
$31.6B $2.34 2.8% 71.57% $91.73
UNM
Unum Group
$3.3B $2.11 0.18% 99.22% $93.69
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
$113.97 $113.00 $59.1B 16.55x $0.61 2.06% 3.55x
ALL
The Allstate Corp.
$212.76 $239.95 $55.3B 5.57x $1.00 1.88% 0.84x
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
$33.63 $45.33 $636.4M 13.61x $1.39 4.64% 2.02x
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
$146.08 $172.00 $11.6B 10.37x $0.27 0.74% 2.01x
MET
MetLife, Inc.
$75.94 $91.73 $49.8B 16.12x $0.57 2.99% 0.66x
UNM
Unum Group
$73.82 $93.69 $12.1B 17.37x $0.46 2.44% 0.98x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
22.19% -0.217 14.7% 0.00x
ALL
The Allstate Corp.
20.05% -0.222 13.67% 0.00x
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
-- -0.317 -- 0.00x
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
30.53% -0.177 23.58% 0.00x
MET
MetLife, Inc.
41.97% 0.854 39.3% 0.00x
UNM
Unum Group
25.7% 0.177 29.95% 0.00x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
-- $1.6B 10.18% 13.23% 32.31% $315M
ALL
The Allstate Corp.
-- $5B 30.97% 40.9% 28.34% $2.9B
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
-- $12.7M 17.81% 18.18% 15.56% $9.8M
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
-- $375.7M 14% 20.88% 21.68% $330.1M
MET
MetLife, Inc.
-- $1.4B 7.05% 12.03% 4.69% $8.1B
UNM
Unum Group
-- $271.3M 4.96% 6.65% 6.74% $320.1M

Aflac, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or ALL?

    The Allstate Corp. has a net margin of 28.34% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 22.06%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.23% beat The Allstate Corp.'s return on equity of 40.9%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $2.64 $37.9B
    ALL
    The Allstate Corp.
    -- $14.37 $38.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or ALL?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $113.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.85%. On the other hand The Allstate Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $239.95 which suggests that it could grow by 12.78%. Given that The Allstate Corp. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe The Allstate Corp. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    ALL
    The Allstate Corp.
    11 8 0
  • Is AFL or ALL More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Allstate Corp. has a beta of 0.235, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.46%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or ALL?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. The Allstate Corp. offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 34.04% of its earnings as a dividend. The Allstate Corp. pays out 10.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or ALL?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than The Allstate Corp. quarterly revenues of $17.3B. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B is lower than The Allstate Corp.'s net income of $3.8B. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.55x while The Allstate Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.55x versus 0.84x for The Allstate Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.55x 16.55x $4.9B $1.4B
    ALL
    The Allstate Corp.
    0.84x 5.57x $17.3B $3.8B
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or AMSF?

    AMERISAFE, Inc. has a net margin of 28.34% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 12.78%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.23% beat AMERISAFE, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.18%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $2.64 $37.9B
    AMSF
    AMERISAFE, Inc.
    -- $0.55 $274.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or AMSF?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $113.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.85%. On the other hand AMERISAFE, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.33 which suggests that it could grow by 34.8%. Given that AMERISAFE, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe AMERISAFE, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    AMSF
    AMERISAFE, Inc.
    0 2 0
  • Is AFL or AMSF More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMERISAFE, Inc. has a beta of 0.355, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.5%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or AMSF?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. AMERISAFE, Inc. offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.39 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 34.04% of its earnings as a dividend. AMERISAFE, Inc. pays out 63.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or AMSF?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than AMERISAFE, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.6M. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than AMERISAFE, Inc.'s net income of $10.4M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.55x while AMERISAFE, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.55x versus 2.02x for AMERISAFE, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.55x 16.55x $4.9B $1.4B
    AMSF
    AMERISAFE, Inc.
    2.02x 13.61x $81.6M $10.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or GL?

    Globe Life, Inc. has a net margin of 28.34% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 17.51%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.23% beat Globe Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.88%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $2.64 $37.9B
    GL
    Globe Life, Inc.
    -- $3.29 $8.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or GL?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $113.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.85%. On the other hand Globe Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $172.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.74%. Given that Globe Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe Globe Life, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    GL
    Globe Life, Inc.
    4 3 0
  • Is AFL or GL More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.468, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.174%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or GL?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Globe Life, Inc. offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 34.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life, Inc. pays out 7.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or GL?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Globe Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than Globe Life, Inc.'s net income of $266.1M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.55x while Globe Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.55x versus 2.01x for Globe Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.55x 16.55x $4.9B $1.4B
    GL
    Globe Life, Inc.
    2.01x 10.37x $1.5B $266.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or MET?

    MetLife, Inc. has a net margin of 28.34% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 3.43%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.23% beat MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.03%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $2.64 $37.9B
    MET
    MetLife, Inc.
    -- $1.17 $49.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or MET?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $113.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.85%. On the other hand MetLife, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $91.73 which suggests that it could grow by 20.8%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    MET
    MetLife, Inc.
    8 6 0
  • Is AFL or MET More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.055%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or MET?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. MetLife, Inc. offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 34.04% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife, Inc. pays out 47.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or MET?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.8B. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $816M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.55x while MetLife, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.55x versus 0.66x for MetLife, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.55x 16.55x $4.9B $1.4B
    MET
    MetLife, Inc.
    0.66x 16.12x $23.8B $816M
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or UNM?

    Unum Group has a net margin of 28.34% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 5.37%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.23% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 6.65%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $2.64 $37.9B
    UNM
    Unum Group
    -- $1.04 $15B
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or UNM?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $113.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.85%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $93.69 which suggests that it could grow by 26.92%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    UNM
    Unum Group
    7 4 0
  • Is AFL or UNM More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.200, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.97%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or UNM?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 34.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 41.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or UNM?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than Unum Group's net income of $174.1M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.55x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 17.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.55x versus 0.98x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.55x 16.55x $4.9B $1.4B
    UNM
    Unum Group
    0.98x 17.37x $3.2B $174.1M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?

Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…

Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?

Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…

Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?

Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…

Stock Ideas

Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x

Alerts

Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27

Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 14.29% over the past day.

Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 7.51% over the past day.

Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27

LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 5.73% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock