Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
48
WTBFA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$499.98
Seasonality move
:
34.92%
Day range:
$499.98 - $499.98
52-week range:
$455.00 - $580.00
Dividend yield:
1.48%
P/E ratio:
27.40x
P/S ratio:
3.67x
P/B ratio:
1.37x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
2.04%
Market cap:
$1.3B
Revenue:
$342.3M
EPS (TTM):
$18.25
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WTBFA
WTB Financial A
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ALLY
Ally Financial
|
$2B | $0.52 | -12.26% | 297.16% | $41.63 |
|
GHI
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP
|
$25.9M | $0.28 | 125.99% | 66.67% | -- |
|
LMFA
LM Funding America
|
$1.8M | -$2.36 | -72.17% | -161.55% | -- |
|
NAVI
Navient
|
$149.8M | $0.25 | -40.52% | -61.24% | $14.67 |
|
PYPL
PayPal Holdings
|
$7.9B | $1.07 | 3.46% | -13.39% | $93.69 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WTBFA
WTB Financial A
|
$499.98 | -- | $1.3B | 27.40x | $1.85 | 1.48% | 3.67x |
|
ALLY
Ally Financial
|
$34.86 | $41.63 | $10.6B | 13.94x | $0.30 | 3.44% | 1.20x |
|
GHI
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP
|
$10.89 | -- | $251.4M | 17.29x | $0.37 | 13.59% | 6.83x |
|
LMFA
LM Funding America
|
$2.26 | -- | $7.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.34x |
|
NAVI
Navient
|
$14.26 | $14.67 | $1.5B | 20.67x | $0.16 | 4.49% | 1.71x |
|
PYPL
PayPal Holdings
|
$87.13 | $93.69 | $87.4B | 20.79x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.93x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WTBFA
WTB Financial A
|
52.05% | -0.119 | 83.73% | 22.28x |
|
ALLY
Ally Financial
|
55.29% | 1.433 | 138.26% | 3.97x |
|
GHI
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP
|
73.13% | 0.578 | 276.24% | 5.69x |
|
LMFA
LM Funding America
|
17.41% | 6.670 | 101.79% | 2.96x |
|
NAVI
Navient
|
94.83% | 1.711 | 2949.1% | 0.71x |
|
PYPL
PayPal Holdings
|
33.09% | -0.149 | 12.71% | 1.17x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WTBFA
WTB Financial A
|
-- | -- | 1.85% | 5.07% | 78.05% | -- |
|
ALLY
Ally Financial
|
-- | -- | 2.7% | 6.42% | 92.33% | $58M |
|
GHI
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP
|
-- | -- | 1.17% | 4.22% | 4251.31% | $4.9M |
|
LMFA
LM Funding America
|
-- | -- | -30.75% | -32.38% | -489% | -$2.7M |
|
NAVI
Navient
|
-- | -- | 0.14% | 2.85% | 474.58% | -$10M |
|
PYPL
PayPal Holdings
|
$3.7B | $1.5B | 14.57% | 21.65% | 18.06% | $1.4B |
WTB Financial A vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns WTBFA or ALLY?
Ally Financial has a net margin of 13.76% compared to WTB Financial A's net margin of 15.56%. WTB Financial A's return on equity of 5.07% beat Ally Financial's return on equity of 6.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WTBFAWTB Financial A-- $4.75 $1.9B ALLYAlly Financial-- $1.06 $32.9B -
What do Analysts Say About WTBFA or ALLY?
WTB Financial A has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ally Financial has an analysts' consensus of $41.63 which suggests that it could grow by 19.43%. Given that Ally Financial has higher upside potential than WTB Financial A, analysts believe Ally Financial is more attractive than WTB Financial A.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WTBFAWTB Financial A0 0 0 ALLYAlly Financial4 9 1 -
Is WTBFA or ALLY More Risky?
WTB Financial A has a beta of 0.175, which suggesting that the stock is 82.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ally Financial has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.066%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WTBFA or ALLY?
WTB Financial A has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.48%. Ally Financial offers a yield of 3.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. WTB Financial A pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ally Financial pays out 46.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Ally Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WTBFA or ALLY?
WTB Financial A quarterly revenues are $86.1M, which are smaller than Ally Financial quarterly revenues of $2.3B. WTB Financial A's net income of $11.9M is lower than Ally Financial's net income of $357M. Notably, WTB Financial A's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.40x while Ally Financial's PE ratio is 13.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WTB Financial A is 3.67x versus 1.20x for Ally Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WTBFAWTB Financial A3.67x 27.40x $86.1M $11.9M ALLYAlly Financial1.20x 13.94x $2.3B $357M
-
Which has Higher Returns WTBFA or GHI?
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a net margin of 13.76% compared to WTB Financial A's net margin of -1816.14%. WTB Financial A's return on equity of 5.07% beat Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's return on equity of 4.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WTBFAWTB Financial A-- $4.75 $1.9B GHIGreystone Housing Impact Investors LP-- -$0.23 $1.5B -
What do Analysts Say About WTBFA or GHI?
WTB Financial A has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 53.81%. Given that Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has higher upside potential than WTB Financial A, analysts believe Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is more attractive than WTB Financial A.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WTBFAWTB Financial A0 0 0 GHIGreystone Housing Impact Investors LP0 0 0 -
Is WTBFA or GHI More Risky?
WTB Financial A has a beta of 0.175, which suggesting that the stock is 82.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.523%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WTBFA or GHI?
WTB Financial A has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.48%. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP offers a yield of 13.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. WTB Financial A pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP pays out 78.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WTBFA or GHI?
WTB Financial A quarterly revenues are $86.1M, which are larger than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP quarterly revenues of $255.3K. WTB Financial A's net income of $11.9M is higher than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's net income of -$4.6M. Notably, WTB Financial A's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.40x while Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's PE ratio is 17.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WTB Financial A is 3.67x versus 6.83x for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WTBFAWTB Financial A3.67x 27.40x $86.1M $11.9M GHIGreystone Housing Impact Investors LP6.83x 17.29x $255.3K -$4.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns WTBFA or LMFA?
LM Funding America has a net margin of 13.76% compared to WTB Financial A's net margin of -490.99%. WTB Financial A's return on equity of 5.07% beat LM Funding America's return on equity of -32.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WTBFAWTB Financial A-- $4.75 $1.9B LMFALM Funding America-- -$2.41 $35M -
What do Analysts Say About WTBFA or LMFA?
WTB Financial A has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LM Funding America has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 165.49%. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than WTB Financial A, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than WTB Financial A.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WTBFAWTB Financial A0 0 0 LMFALM Funding America0 0 0 -
Is WTBFA or LMFA More Risky?
WTB Financial A has a beta of 0.175, which suggesting that the stock is 82.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LM Funding America has a beta of 1.356, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.59%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WTBFA or LMFA?
WTB Financial A has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.48%. LM Funding America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WTB Financial A pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LM Funding America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WTBFA or LMFA?
WTB Financial A quarterly revenues are $86.1M, which are larger than LM Funding America quarterly revenues of $956.9K. WTB Financial A's net income of $11.9M is higher than LM Funding America's net income of -$4.7M. Notably, WTB Financial A's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.40x while LM Funding America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WTB Financial A is 3.67x versus 0.34x for LM Funding America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WTBFAWTB Financial A3.67x 27.40x $86.1M $11.9M LMFALM Funding America0.34x -- $956.9K -$4.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns WTBFA or NAVI?
Navient has a net margin of 13.76% compared to WTB Financial A's net margin of -1.13%. WTB Financial A's return on equity of 5.07% beat Navient's return on equity of 2.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WTBFAWTB Financial A-- $4.75 $1.9B NAVINavient-- -$0.02 $52.1B -
What do Analysts Say About WTBFA or NAVI?
WTB Financial A has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Navient has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 2.85%. Given that Navient has higher upside potential than WTB Financial A, analysts believe Navient is more attractive than WTB Financial A.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WTBFAWTB Financial A0 0 0 NAVINavient0 8 1 -
Is WTBFA or NAVI More Risky?
WTB Financial A has a beta of 0.175, which suggesting that the stock is 82.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Navient has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.499%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WTBFA or NAVI?
WTB Financial A has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.48%. Navient offers a yield of 4.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. WTB Financial A pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Navient pays out 34.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Navient's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WTBFA or NAVI?
WTB Financial A quarterly revenues are $86.1M, which are smaller than Navient quarterly revenues of $177M. WTB Financial A's net income of $11.9M is higher than Navient's net income of -$2M. Notably, WTB Financial A's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.40x while Navient's PE ratio is 20.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WTB Financial A is 3.67x versus 1.71x for Navient. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WTBFAWTB Financial A3.67x 27.40x $86.1M $11.9M NAVINavient1.71x 20.67x $177M -$2M
-
Which has Higher Returns WTBFA or PYPL?
PayPal Holdings has a net margin of 13.76% compared to WTB Financial A's net margin of 12.87%. WTB Financial A's return on equity of 5.07% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 21.65%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WTBFAWTB Financial A-- $4.75 $1.9B PYPLPayPal Holdings46.57% $0.99 $30.2B -
What do Analysts Say About WTBFA or PYPL?
WTB Financial A has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $93.69 which suggests that it could grow by 7.53%. Given that PayPal Holdings has higher upside potential than WTB Financial A, analysts believe PayPal Holdings is more attractive than WTB Financial A.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WTBFAWTB Financial A0 0 0 PYPLPayPal Holdings18 20 0 -
Is WTBFA or PYPL More Risky?
WTB Financial A has a beta of 0.175, which suggesting that the stock is 82.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.017%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WTBFA or PYPL?
WTB Financial A has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.48%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WTB Financial A pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WTBFA or PYPL?
WTB Financial A quarterly revenues are $86.1M, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.8B. WTB Financial A's net income of $11.9M is lower than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1B. Notably, WTB Financial A's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.40x while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 20.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WTB Financial A is 3.67x versus 2.93x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WTBFAWTB Financial A3.67x 27.40x $86.1M $11.9M PYPLPayPal Holdings2.93x 20.79x $7.8B $1B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
