WOPEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Karoon Energy has a net margin of -4.79% compared to Woodside Energy Group's net margin of --. Woodside Energy Group's return on equity of -0.15% beat Karoon Energy's return on equity of --.

Woodside Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Karoon Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Woodside Energy Group has higher upside potential than Karoon Energy, analysts believe Woodside Energy Group is more attractive than Karoon Energy.

Woodside Energy Group has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Karoon Energy has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.077%.

Woodside Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.99%. Karoon Energy offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Woodside Energy Group pays 256.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Karoon Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Woodside Energy Group quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Karoon Energy quarterly revenues of --. Woodside Energy Group's net income of -$170.1M is higher than Karoon Energy's net income of --. Notably, Woodside Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Karoon Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodside Energy Group is 0.98x versus -- for Karoon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Santos has a net margin of -4.79% compared to Woodside Energy Group's net margin of --. Woodside Energy Group's return on equity of -0.15% beat Santos's return on equity of 8.28%.

Woodside Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Santos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Woodside Energy Group has higher upside potential than Santos, analysts believe Woodside Energy Group is more attractive than Santos.

Woodside Energy Group has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Santos has a beta of 1.572, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.237%.

Woodside Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.99%. Santos offers a yield of 6.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Woodside Energy Group pays 256.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Santos pays out 54.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Santos's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Woodside Energy Group's is not.

Woodside Energy Group quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Santos quarterly revenues of --. Woodside Energy Group's net income of -$170.1M is higher than Santos's net income of --. Notably, Woodside Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Santos's PE ratio is 10.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodside Energy Group is 0.98x versus 2.58x for Santos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tamboran Resources has a net margin of -4.79% compared to Woodside Energy Group's net margin of --. Woodside Energy Group's return on equity of -0.15% beat Tamboran Resources's return on equity of --.

Woodside Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tamboran Resources has an analysts' consensus of $40.80 which suggests that it could grow by 97.39%. Given that Tamboran Resources has higher upside potential than Woodside Energy Group, analysts believe Tamboran Resources is more attractive than Woodside Energy Group.

Woodside Energy Group has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tamboran Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Woodside Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.99%. Tamboran Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodside Energy Group pays 256.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Tamboran Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Woodside Energy Group quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Tamboran Resources quarterly revenues of --. Woodside Energy Group's net income of -$170.1M is lower than Tamboran Resources's net income of -$5.9M. Notably, Woodside Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tamboran Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodside Energy Group is 0.98x versus -- for Tamboran Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.