WLWHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Leatt has a net margin of -- compared to Woolworths Holdings's net margin of 0.95%. Woolworths Holdings's return on equity of 22.53% beat Leatt's return on equity of -8.1%.

Woolworths Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Leatt has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Woolworths Holdings has higher upside potential than Leatt, analysts believe Woolworths Holdings is more attractive than Leatt.

Woolworths Holdings has a beta of 0.640, which suggesting that the stock is 36.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leatt has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.38%.

Woolworths Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Leatt offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woolworths Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leatt pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Woolworths Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Leatt quarterly revenues of $12.1M. Woolworths Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Leatt's net income of $115.8K. Notably, Woolworths Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while Leatt's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woolworths Holdings is 0.74x versus 1.07x for Leatt. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mr Price Group has a net margin of -- compared to Woolworths Holdings's net margin of --. Woolworths Holdings's return on equity of 22.53% beat Mr Price Group's return on equity of 23.41%.

Woolworths Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mr Price Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Woolworths Holdings has higher upside potential than Mr Price Group, analysts believe Woolworths Holdings is more attractive than Mr Price Group.

Woolworths Holdings has a beta of 0.640, which suggesting that the stock is 36.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mr Price Group has a beta of 1.326, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.575%.

Woolworths Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Mr Price Group offers a yield of 3.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Woolworths Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mr Price Group pays out 58.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Mr Price Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woolworths Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mr Price Group quarterly revenues of --. Woolworths Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Mr Price Group's net income of --. Notably, Woolworths Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while Mr Price Group's PE ratio is 0.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woolworths Holdings is 0.74x versus 1.95x for Mr Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pick N Pay Stores has a net margin of -- compared to Woolworths Holdings's net margin of --. Woolworths Holdings's return on equity of 22.53% beat Pick N Pay Stores's return on equity of -157.94%.

Woolworths Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pick N Pay Stores has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Woolworths Holdings has higher upside potential than Pick N Pay Stores, analysts believe Woolworths Holdings is more attractive than Pick N Pay Stores.

Woolworths Holdings has a beta of 0.640, which suggesting that the stock is 36.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pick N Pay Stores has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Woolworths Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Pick N Pay Stores offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. Woolworths Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pick N Pay Stores pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Woolworths Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pick N Pay Stores quarterly revenues of --. Woolworths Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Pick N Pay Stores's net income of --. Notably, Woolworths Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while Pick N Pay Stores's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woolworths Holdings is 0.74x versus 0.11x for Pick N Pay Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shoprite Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Woolworths Holdings's net margin of --. Woolworths Holdings's return on equity of 22.53% beat Shoprite Holdings's return on equity of 23.3%.

Woolworths Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shoprite Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Woolworths Holdings has higher upside potential than Shoprite Holdings, analysts believe Woolworths Holdings is more attractive than Shoprite Holdings.

Woolworths Holdings has a beta of 0.640, which suggesting that the stock is 36.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shoprite Holdings has a beta of 0.653, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.701%.

Woolworths Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Shoprite Holdings offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Woolworths Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shoprite Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Woolworths Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Shoprite Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Woolworths Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Shoprite Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Woolworths Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while Shoprite Holdings's PE ratio is 25.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woolworths Holdings is 0.74x versus 0.66x for Shoprite Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.