VOLVF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BTS Group AB has a net margin of 7.77% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 7.81%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.03% beat BTS Group AB's return on equity of 8.78%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BTS Group AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than BTS Group AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than BTS Group AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BTS Group AB has a beta of -0.217, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.665%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. BTS Group AB offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Volvo AB pays 50.16% of its earnings as a dividend. BTS Group AB pays out 30.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are larger than BTS Group AB quarterly revenues of $75.4M. Volvo AB's net income of $1B is higher than BTS Group AB's net income of $5.9M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.09x while BTS Group AB's PE ratio is 21.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.51x versus 1.07x for BTS Group AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OXE Marine AB has a net margin of 7.77% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of -77.06%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.03% beat OXE Marine AB's return on equity of -38.56%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand OXE Marine AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than OXE Marine AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than OXE Marine AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OXE Marine AB has a beta of -0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 196.044%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. OXE Marine AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Volvo AB pays 50.16% of its earnings as a dividend. OXE Marine AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Volvo AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are larger than OXE Marine AB quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Volvo AB's net income of $1B is higher than OXE Marine AB's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.09x while OXE Marine AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.51x versus 1.84x for OXE Marine AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Saab AB has a net margin of 7.77% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 9.27%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.03% beat Saab AB's return on equity of 16.04%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Saab AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Saab AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Saab AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saab AB has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.53%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. Saab AB offers a yield of 0.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Volvo AB pays 50.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Saab AB pays out 16.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are larger than Saab AB quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Volvo AB's net income of $1B is higher than Saab AB's net income of $273M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.09x while Saab AB's PE ratio is 58.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.51x versus 4.66x for Saab AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.