VOLAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Atlas Copco AB has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 16.04%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.21% beat Atlas Copco AB's return on equity of 25.49%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Atlas Copco AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Atlas Copco AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Atlas Copco AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 0.421, which suggesting that the stock is 57.92% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlas Copco AB has a beta of 1.406, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.579%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Atlas Copco AB offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Volvo AB pays 32.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlas Copco AB pays out 40.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $11.6B, which are larger than Atlas Copco AB quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Volvo AB's net income of $796.8M is higher than Atlas Copco AB's net income of $701.3M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.64x while Atlas Copco AB's PE ratio is 32.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.19x versus 5.16x for Atlas Copco AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Husqvarna AB has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of -0.11%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.21% beat Husqvarna AB's return on equity of 6.1%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Husqvarna AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Husqvarna AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Husqvarna AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 0.421, which suggesting that the stock is 57.92% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Husqvarna AB has a beta of 1.838, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.757%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Husqvarna AB offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Volvo AB pays 32.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Husqvarna AB pays out 30.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $11.6B, which are larger than Husqvarna AB quarterly revenues of $967.1M. Volvo AB's net income of $796.8M is higher than Husqvarna AB's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.64x while Husqvarna AB's PE ratio is 18.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.19x versus 0.59x for Husqvarna AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Securitas AB has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 1.64%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.21% beat Securitas AB's return on equity of 12.52%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Securitas AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Securitas AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Securitas AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 0.421, which suggesting that the stock is 57.92% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Securitas AB has a beta of 0.779, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.103%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Securitas AB offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Volvo AB pays 32.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Securitas AB pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $11.6B, which are larger than Securitas AB quarterly revenues of $4B. Volvo AB's net income of $796.8M is higher than Securitas AB's net income of $66.3M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.64x while Securitas AB's PE ratio is 18.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.19x versus 0.57x for Securitas AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sandvik Aktiebolag has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 12.11%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.21% beat Sandvik Aktiebolag's return on equity of 15.89%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sandvik Aktiebolag has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Sandvik Aktiebolag, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Sandvik Aktiebolag.

Volvo AB has a beta of 0.421, which suggesting that the stock is 57.92% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sandvik Aktiebolag has a beta of 1.486, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.615%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Sandvik Aktiebolag offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Volvo AB pays 32.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandvik Aktiebolag pays out 42.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $11.6B, which are larger than Sandvik Aktiebolag quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Volvo AB's net income of $796.8M is higher than Sandvik Aktiebolag's net income of $371.8M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.64x while Sandvik Aktiebolag's PE ratio is 26.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.19x versus 3.27x for Sandvik Aktiebolag. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.