VERO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CeCors, Inc. has a net margin of -163.68% compared to Venus Concept, Inc.'s net margin of --. Venus Concept, Inc.'s return on equity of -1236.95% beat CeCors, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Venus Concept, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30584.21%. On the other hand CeCors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Venus Concept, Inc. has higher upside potential than CeCors, Inc., analysts believe Venus Concept, Inc. is more attractive than CeCors, Inc..

Venus Concept, Inc. has a beta of 0.051, which suggesting that the stock is 94.885% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CeCors, Inc. has a beta of 0.581, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.886%.

Venus Concept, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CeCors, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Venus Concept, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CeCors, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Venus Concept, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.8M, which are larger than CeCors, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Venus Concept, Inc.'s net income of -$22.5M is higher than CeCors, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Venus Concept, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CeCors, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Venus Concept, Inc. is 0.01x versus 0.42x for CeCors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Edwards Lifesciences Corp. has a net margin of -163.68% compared to Venus Concept, Inc.'s net margin of 4.09%. Venus Concept, Inc.'s return on equity of -1236.95% beat Edwards Lifesciences Corp.'s return on equity of 10.27%.

Venus Concept, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30584.21%. On the other hand Edwards Lifesciences Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $96.46 which suggests that it could grow by 13.12%. Given that Venus Concept, Inc. has higher upside potential than Edwards Lifesciences Corp., analysts believe Venus Concept, Inc. is more attractive than Edwards Lifesciences Corp..

Venus Concept, Inc. has a beta of 0.051, which suggesting that the stock is 94.885% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Edwards Lifesciences Corp. has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.349%.

Venus Concept, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Edwards Lifesciences Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Venus Concept, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Edwards Lifesciences Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Venus Concept, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.8M, which are smaller than Edwards Lifesciences Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Venus Concept, Inc.'s net income of -$22.5M is lower than Edwards Lifesciences Corp.'s net income of $64.2M. Notably, Venus Concept, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Edwards Lifesciences Corp.'s PE ratio is 47.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Venus Concept, Inc. is 0.01x versus 8.23x for Edwards Lifesciences Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hear AtLast Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -163.68% compared to Venus Concept, Inc.'s net margin of --. Venus Concept, Inc.'s return on equity of -1236.95% beat Hear AtLast Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Venus Concept, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30584.21%. On the other hand Hear AtLast Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Venus Concept, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hear AtLast Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Venus Concept, Inc. is more attractive than Hear AtLast Holdings, Inc..

Venus Concept, Inc. has a beta of 0.051, which suggesting that the stock is 94.885% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hear AtLast Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.307, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.314%.

Venus Concept, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hear AtLast Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Venus Concept, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hear AtLast Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Venus Concept, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.8M, which are larger than Hear AtLast Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Venus Concept, Inc.'s net income of -$22.5M is lower than Hear AtLast Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$152.6K. Notably, Venus Concept, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hear AtLast Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Venus Concept, Inc. is 0.01x versus -- for Hear AtLast Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nutriband, Inc. has a net margin of -163.68% compared to Venus Concept, Inc.'s net margin of -1118.87%. Venus Concept, Inc.'s return on equity of -1236.95% beat Nutriband, Inc.'s return on equity of -164.64%.

Venus Concept, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30584.21%. On the other hand Nutriband, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 262.32%. Given that Venus Concept, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nutriband, Inc., analysts believe Venus Concept, Inc. is more attractive than Nutriband, Inc..

Venus Concept, Inc. has a beta of 0.051, which suggesting that the stock is 94.885% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nutriband, Inc. has a beta of 1.801, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.088%.

Venus Concept, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nutriband, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Venus Concept, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nutriband, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Venus Concept, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.8M, which are larger than Nutriband, Inc. quarterly revenues of $346.1K. Venus Concept, Inc.'s net income of -$22.5M is lower than Nutriband, Inc.'s net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Venus Concept, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nutriband, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Venus Concept, Inc. is 0.01x versus 20.66x for Nutriband, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.