UPCHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

YaSheng Group has a net margin of -- compared to Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.87% beat YaSheng Group's return on equity of --.

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand YaSheng Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than YaSheng Group, analysts believe Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than YaSheng Group.

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.125, which suggesting that the stock is 87.541% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison YaSheng Group has a beta of 0.778, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.17%.

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $5.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.11%. YaSheng Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. pays 98.79% of its earnings as a dividend. YaSheng Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than YaSheng Group quarterly revenues of --. Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than YaSheng Group's net income of --. Notably, Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.80x while YaSheng Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. is 0.96x versus 0.12x for YaSheng Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.87% beat Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 41.83%.

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd., analysts believe Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd..

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.125, which suggesting that the stock is 87.541% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.069, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.111%.

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $5.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.11%. Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. pays 98.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd. pays out 73.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.80x while Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 32.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. is 0.96x versus 9.84x for Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tsingtao Brewery Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -22.04%. Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.87% beat Tsingtao Brewery Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.95%.

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tsingtao Brewery Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tsingtao Brewery Co., Ltd., analysts believe Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Tsingtao Brewery Co., Ltd..

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.125, which suggesting that the stock is 87.541% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tsingtao Brewery Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.150, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.038%.

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $5.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.11%. Tsingtao Brewery Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 9.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. pays 98.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Tsingtao Brewery Co., Ltd. pays out 64.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tsingtao Brewery Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $438.2M. Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tsingtao Brewery Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$96.6M. Notably, Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.80x while Tsingtao Brewery Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. is 0.96x versus 1.81x for Tsingtao Brewery Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yantai North Andre Juice Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 13.1%. Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.87% beat Yantai North Andre Juice Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.1%.

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Yantai North Andre Juice Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Yantai North Andre Juice Co., Ltd., analysts believe Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Yantai North Andre Juice Co., Ltd..

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.125, which suggesting that the stock is 87.541% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yantai North Andre Juice Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.961, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.851%.

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $5.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.11%. Yantai North Andre Juice Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. pays 98.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Yantai North Andre Juice Co., Ltd. pays out 31.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Yantai North Andre Juice Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $50.2M. Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Yantai North Andre Juice Co., Ltd.'s net income of $6.6M. Notably, Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.80x while Yantai North Andre Juice Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 15.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uni-President China Holdings Ltd. is 0.96x versus 2.99x for Yantai North Andre Juice Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.