UNRG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mexco Energy Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s net margin of 18.65%. United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s return on equity of -- beat Mexco Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 9.05%.

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mexco Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy Corp., analysts believe United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) is more attractive than Mexco Energy Corp..

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) has a beta of -2.640, which suggesting that the stock is 363.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.331, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.89%.

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mexco Energy Corp. offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy Corp. pays out 12.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) quarterly revenues are $25.5K, which are smaller than Mexco Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.7M. United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s net income of $736.3K is higher than Mexco Energy Corp.'s net income of $323.5K. Notably, United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mexco Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) is 126.92x versus 2.68x for Mexco Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PEDEVCO Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s net margin of -4.67%. United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s return on equity of -- beat PEDEVCO Corp.'s return on equity of 3.5%.

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PEDEVCO Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $0.85 which suggests that it could grow by 55.42%. Given that PEDEVCO Corp. has higher upside potential than United Energy Corp. (New Jersey), analysts believe PEDEVCO Corp. is more attractive than United Energy Corp. (New Jersey).

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) has a beta of -2.640, which suggesting that the stock is 363.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PEDEVCO Corp. has a beta of 0.317, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.317%.

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PEDEVCO Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PEDEVCO Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) quarterly revenues are $25.5K, which are smaller than PEDEVCO Corp. quarterly revenues of $7M. United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s net income of $736.3K is higher than PEDEVCO Corp.'s net income of -$325K. Notably, United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PEDEVCO Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) is 126.92x versus 1.50x for PEDEVCO Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s net margin of -65.69%. United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s return on equity of -- beat Ring Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.87%.

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ring Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 189.59%. Given that Ring Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Energy Corp. (New Jersey), analysts believe Ring Energy, Inc. is more attractive than United Energy Corp. (New Jersey).

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) has a beta of -2.640, which suggesting that the stock is 363.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.481%.

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ring Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) quarterly revenues are $25.5K, which are smaller than Ring Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $78.6M. United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s net income of $736.3K is higher than Ring Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$51.6M. Notably, United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ring Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) is 126.92x versus 0.54x for Ring Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s net margin of 15.29%. United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s return on equity of -- beat Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.15%.

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 76.45%. Given that Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Energy Corp. (New Jersey), analysts believe Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. is more attractive than United Energy Corp. (New Jersey).

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) has a beta of -2.640, which suggesting that the stock is 363.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.163%.

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. offers a yield of 5.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. pays out 33.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) quarterly revenues are $25.5K, which are smaller than Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. quarterly revenues of $106.9M. United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s net income of $736.3K is lower than Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s net income of $16.3M. Notably, United Energy Corp. (New Jersey)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Energy Corp. (New Jersey) is 126.92x versus 1.39x for Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.